Old street sogn from my town.
Thanks Jack! This too seems good ones, I'll go for them. It's so perfect that there's also three novels to read, I love reading.
#Phoenix channel management 1.200 sats, #alby hub 20.000 sats. Quite different
This taxing thing maybe will have the collateral effect to concentrate more money in less hands. There will be little enterprises that maybe won't be able to afford it and there's always someone with more economic power.
I like to share some of my #music as singles because I like to attach some music with some image (usually some generative or photo made by myself). It's awful if one serach my music on an app like, for instance, Podcast Addict, because you see every single song as a podcast and it gets two clicks to achieve the music. Two clicks can be excessive in the days we are living. I'm happy because using #fountain I see that one can search by artist and get straight to a list of the music. That's perfect! So from now on, I'm recommending fountain to everyone. So here is my artist çink with the three pieces I uploaded by now. I'm trying to improve masterings before uploading music so I'm going slow. Stay tuned and thanks for hearing!
I like so much the #wavlake analytics. It's funny to see in wich parts of the world someone has given an opportunity to my music. Usually the top one is alway USA, maybe because #nostr is more adopted. It would be great also having some feedback but I'm happy just with this, by now. On spotify and other services, I've never had analytics that good.
Thanks for your time!
How about NFTs on lightning? Surely that's an absurdity, but if there's room for coins...
Time for a new one on #wavlake this time is #orchestral #music. Just a mockup of a piece derived from a child song from Catalonia.
https://wavlake.com/album/83798e57-1700-41a5-9ed4-7d8f08d30751
The point is your byass (and mine too). As I said in another response to you, I absolutely do disagree with your fundamentals.
Panmixia (funny term) is something that has always existed. You don't have the colour of skin that you have because from the begining of times on cluster of white people decided to not mix with others, evolution and mixing leaded to your phenotypia. So I thing you are confusing terms to get your point.
The value is not in maintaining whatever kimera you made about race, the value is to maintain humanity that is the hability to understand between all humans and to be empathic... Well, probably you disagree with me
I'm sorry for you but long term temds to crate more equal humans and diluting races. Unless you force people to dtay where they born and ban them to procreate "in a multiracial way". You only can do that using violence in any sense
Why? The last sentence here does not have any relation with the first part of your argument.
People moves because we are all more or less free to decide what we want to do with our lifes. And no one is good or bad from where one is born. Being born here or there is pure contingency and does not define nothing, as I see. Every human has the right to not want to life where one is born. I don't see the problem here.
You talk about immigration in very bad terms, but I'm sure that your ancestors, at some point, moved. And maybe you or your ancestors participated in diluting some other culture that was there before. For example, whites americans tend to reclaim american nation as something that bellngs to europeans descendants, but they where, at some point, immigrants that took over natives there (cherokees...) and they, at the same time did the same... And the wheel keeps wheeling
I absolutely disagree. "One reace" nations are something of the past you like it or not. On the other hand, culture and tradition is something permeable that can be adopted by whoever human that decides to live on wherever wants. When people moves, maintains certain traditions from where they come and also adopts some of the place where they go. This, with the proper amount of time, creates culture. And nations are most culture than skin colour. I supouse that we can agree that french and english people are two different nations (to point some), and the "race" is the same. Or normand people that might consider themselves a nation and in "race" terms they are exactly like bretons, frenchs o netherlanders.
I don't get what a "kinship-based state" is exactly, sorry.
For me the first goal is to stop talking about what makes us diferents and point at our common interests that we have a lot as specie the first and more important, avoid our extinction.
Ending all kind of empire is a good thing, always.
If you only point to phenotype you can consider whatever you want. If you consider genotype, you are so mistaken.
As I see, the problem is not if there exists equality or not, the problem is what you do with the diference. I think that in bioethical or just ethical terms we must consider all humans equal without having in consideration what makes us different to another. Pointing unequallity sometimes leads to put "the unequal" on a lower human status and this is dangerous, relays on a false premise, and leads to dystopia.
For this year I'm planning a sort of musical. My goal is to finish it before summer. Let's see if it's possible!
I have meta. I'm not sure if this series is on the store, I'll check it!