Avatar
wolfpy
3319f5048a5d13d019633e555563cefe0e64f68ce0c5f8973ed14b771bcc1834
Funny individual

# Bitcoin #Nostr

I think starting to put bitcoiner on a CV as an interest is going to be well regarded.

That means it is reasonable to expect that this person knows how to unzip files and open PDFs xD

Politicians being Bitcoiners (not just owning ETF) is going to be a good measuring stick for if a person has basic knowledge of Tech

Depressing vibes day


Sometimes afraid of years to come


https://9gag.com/gag/aRBeLnB?utm_source=copy_link&utm_medium=post_share

#bitcoin #nostr

At the moment it is just or mainly a social app, but it will be much more. Has the same core philosophies of freedom as Bitcoin. And it being a protocol an decentralizes will allow for it to be much more than current social platforms can be. For example how Facebook was going to create their coin on the app. I feel like I am the user not the product. As a negative I would still highlight I don’t know how we are going to manage bot spam

Gentle reminder that now is a maybe a good time to do UTXO management

#bitcoin

I don’t but if I needed an anonymous I would have 2. And if I needed to discard my anonymous or create some bot accounts I would have more

First time hearing this ! Love electro house. Obrigado !

Replying to Avatar Dr. Hax

I know traditional #finance and #sustainabilty are #taboo on #nostr, but I maintain that this looks pretty interesting.

https://www.esgtoday.com/green-impact-exchange-files-to-launch-first-ever-sustainability-focused-stock-exchange-in-u-s/

Right now #ESG ratings firms and #investors require all kinds of different reporting paperwork of companies. Having a unified standard would provider better #transparency and cut red tape. It'd also allow the market to determine whether sustainability is important to investors.

It seems like it would only hurt businesses who are unsustainable if sustainability is something investors care about. If not, then removing barriers will not make any difference and the oil and coal companies have nothing to fear.

I have worked in sustainability projects and the amount of greenwashing is crazy. It’s the right incentives going to all the wrong causes. If 10% of it is actually going to good causes is it still a good thing or can we consider it malinvestment? I have nothing against sustainability focused but the fact that we don’t work on a fridge that can last for 50 years and houses that will last for more than 50 years, instead of new re-using or refurbishing current equipment. Most of this things goes against shareholders incentives in a company. And then if your are missalocating capital in your society you are underperforming competitor society’s that have zero regards to the environment. Also maybe some of the most important allocations of capital are not pretty and people don’t want to invest, like waste management.

#GM

If you are happy and you know it clap your hands and #zap your feed ^^

Hmm. I am Not a Developer. The answer I Think is No and Yes. No because there are lot of ways to avoid this happening that don’t mean Nostr. Yes because Nostr is much more resilient to this things being decentralised. I do think this is a wake up call and I think decentralised systems and not having back doors on computer together with privacy of data and self reliance with all that is happening today will lead to people looking at what it is being built here. All news are good to Bitcoin and all news are good for Nostr since they share a lot of the same core principles

Damus Version 1.9 (14) 5c3fc63c

IOS 16.6.1

Wh-as—tss ggggoi—-I—-ing on ??