Avatar
wolfpy
3319f5048a5d13d019633e555563cefe0e64f68ce0c5f8973ed14b771bcc1834
Funny individual
Replying to Avatar Joe Nakamoto

i will do a nostr:npub1jfujw6llhq7wuvu5detycdsq5v5yqf56sgrdq8wlgrryx2a2p09svwm0gx Ask me Anything tomorrow at

🇬🇧 18:00 London time

🇺🇸 13:00 USA Eastern time

In case you are confused, that is exactly the same time.

(teehee)

Looking forward to the AMA🧡

Your favourite bitcoin wallets. Or what you saw that we need to improve when you visited the different countries

nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s I always find fun when it’s Christmas and the apps change something like you can see Santa on Google maps or sending presents. Is there something that can be done in Damus ? Like how can I zap presents to people ? xD

I think whatever is happening is an X hysteria I am not seeing any of it because I am not on X I just am seeing the angry reactions from all of you x)

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

David Bailey just posted the draft for an executive order for the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve under Trump – and it's an absolute nightmare for anyone using bitcoin as money.

First, the draft order defines Bitcoin as "a finite store-of-value asset, akin to digital gold."

As someone who has lived on Bitcoin for a fairly long time, I can say that Bitcoin is not merely a "store-of-value asset", but a money for payment and day to day purchases.

Defining Bitcoin as a "store-of-value asset" reinforces the ossification narrative (who needs to move a stonk several times in a day?) which may put developers at risk when prioritizing changes to btc to make it more usable as money (think scaling for example).

With this definition, a softfork to activate covenants may become an issue of US national security that goes against the US' definition of its primary goals - directly putting developers in the firing line of the United States Government.

The draft states that federal agencies, such as the US Marshall's Service, may not auction seized Bitcoin off, but must contribute them to the strategic reserve.

This not only reduces the Bitcoin in circulation available to the public, but additionally sets the incentive for the US to increase its seizing efforts – think increased AML/KYC.

While I'm no fan of the strategic reserve in general, this draft is an even bigger disappointment than Sen. Lummis' proposed Bitcoin Act.

To compare this to how El Salvador has implemented Bitcoin, which I admit I initially wasn't a fan of either, ES directly gives citizens rights to use Bitcoin as money - which is a huge upside to benefit the people, and not just the national security state.

No offense, but letting a couple of children that just graduated college and a guy who runs a magazine draft US policy is a scene straight out of idiocracy.

Next time, maybe try speaking to the people actually building and using bitcoin, not just to the boomers and national security goons that sit on the money like a fat kid at the cake buffet.

Incredibly unprofessional conduct here by BPI, a huge risk to anyone using Bitcoin for anything other than an investment, and a testament to the people involved being more interested in furthering their own importance than to empower people with a money without state.

Sincerely hope that this EO is drastically challenged on all levels and hopefully somehow deemed unconstitutional to protect btc and the people developing it.

I don’t think that there will be a consensus on whatever will come from the SBR.

Arriving home to family for Christmas and TV is pumping news/propaganda regarding Syria and Ukraine war. Zero proper news from my country. The news conglomerate is scary…

And how much money you spend on the phone or on the computer? My purchases are usually on the computer and when paying for stuff with the phone it is a qr code that opens a webpage that then opens an app x)

When I hit a milestone next year I am going to pop open a bottle and have the coming out of the bitcoin closet to my girlfriend next year

#GM at 105k bitcoin the normie starts to think wait wasn’t it supposed to stop at 100k ? 🤔

Going to be a good week. Santoshi is coming to town 🎅

#bitcoin #bitcoinplebs

Replying to Avatar @Lassmiranda21

https://www.newsweek.com/childfree-millennal-resigned-uninteresting-parents-1996061

If you don't have children, you are missing out on an important experience in life. No other circumstances will shape and develop your character like this.

Without children there is no future.

In today's world, there is a disturbing trend about having children. Some people see children as taking up time and eating up unnecessary resources. Some see them as the biggest problem in their climate psychosis.

(CO2 Scam rule your life.)

In the fast-paced digital world and consumer-oriented hedonistic world, some people don't find a place for it and or don't find a partner in the first place. Values, spirituality and the willpower to achieve something are being abolished in an increasingly indoctrinated world. Many decisions are being taken away and politicians are promising to look after you more and more. You can't go wrong with that. "We'll take care of you."

Keyword personal responsibility

But without goals in life and without your own efforts to create something, life has very little to offer.

People are free to do what they want.

I don‘t unterstand how people who maximalize Freedom have this Trends That everybody Must abide.

Having children is Amazing and everybody Sees it with good eyes. But why does Not having children MUST then be bad?

And why does it have to have an agenda behind ?