Avatar
Primordial🦌
335598caef49b1b45302ea016856a856faf56588e7e15fed03c4954cb843d0a7
SOFTWAR philosophy | mutually assured preservation | electro-cyber warfare and zero-trust cooperation

Bitcoin is rugging the federal reserve.

Indeed... imagine a world where everyone woke up one day, and decided to stop valuing USD and start valuing hard money. Government would be forced to print massive amounts of USD as people exit the system and banks begin to collapse... it would be really cool.

I have the arcane knowledge 👀🫎🫎🫎🫎🫎

Replying to Avatar arkinox

Nostr enables the ONLY social network that has a chance at gaining mass market adoption AND has the potential to utilize POW for spam deterrence. No other clown world VC-funded ESG company will ever even consider using proof of work for anything.

One of the first arguments I always hear against POW is that raising the cost of posting a note will make it so only those with large amounts of hashpower will be able to post notes, and they will dominate the protocol with spam and psyops.

This argument doesn't make sense because if large entities will see value in expending their hashpower to spam nostr, then why aren't they spamming nostr right now while the cost to do so is absolutely free? They should be here already if it is worth their time to be, but it is not dominating nostr at all.

The fallacy is the assertion that those with great hashpower actually care to spend it spamming nostr only when it isn't free. In reality, they would rather spend that hashpower on ROI, like mining bitcoin. The ROI on spamming nostr will likely never match the ROI of spamming other social networks that have no POW cost.

When a normal user posts a dozen notes per day, the cost of adding a modest POW requirement is barely noticeable — roughly a webpage load time worth of waiting. But for a spammer, this cost becomes a material electrical expense that will reduce their capacity to spam. And with a dozen other social networks more popular than nostr, where do you think they will spend their time? Spamming the networks with zero POW costs, of course.

But, putting this POW barrier over nostr would allow legitimate users to flee to nostr for a spam- free experience while keeping spammers out. It could actually help nostr grow in its network effects.

Overall, I am shocked at how bearish people are on proof-of-work, especially bitcoiners.

Once companies realize using the Bitcoin network can enable them to achieve total systemic security for their computer network, some of them will choose to utilize it for this purpose. Militaries will be first to utilize the network in this way.

#Bitcoin does not demonitize warfare.. Bitcoin is literally a new form of warfare and the most efficient physical power projection technology ever invented.

10pm over here ser, GN 😴

#Bitcoin #Proofofwork

Organisms in nature project physical power (watts) to signal ownership of resources.

How the ruling class uses real power to reify abstract power.

#Bitcoin is a weapons system that ushers in a paradigm golf mutually assured preservation.

#Bitcoin fulfills both Henry Ford's idea of monetizing energy as well as Nikola Tesla's prediction that warfare would escalate to human out of the loop energy battles between "intelligent" machines.

Virtually all software these days represent the formation of abstract power hierarchies. These computer generated abstract power hierarchies are the largest in history. As people rely more and more on their computers for so many different aspects of their lives, this gives the people at the apex of these abstract power hierarchies more control over people than at any other time in history, Pharaoh god-kings would blush at this level of abstract power over people's lives.

So what's the solution to this problem? Well, if software is computer generated abstract power, we are going to need computer generated physical power if we want to dismantle, decentralize, and physically constrain people who would otherwise exploit and abuse their privileged control authority over people's software.

Satoshi understood these dynamics at a very fundamental, first principles level. Enter Bitcoin, a decentralized permissionless protocol that converts large amounts of physical power into machine readable bits of information. Computer generated physical power. Satoshis protocol is creating the largest physical-power-based hierarchy humanity has ever witnessed.

Physical power is zero-trust, permissionless, and egalitarian.

Abstract power is trust-based, permission-based, and inegalitarian.

In theory, it should be possible to use the Bitcoin protocol and it's physically costly machine readable bits of information to create a kind of electro-cyber defense dome for any given computer network in order to increase the cost of attacking or exploiting other networks by imposing a severe physically prohibitive cost on would be attackers the same way there is a severe physically prohibitive cost on attacking the Bitcoin network itself.

Free software is a wonderful idea, but nothing is stopping a bad actor who understands how to exploit your softwares logical constraints from doing so. To truly achieve freedom in cyberspace we need a way to impose a severe physical constraint on attackers through cyberspace itself. This is what Satoshi has gifted humanity with.

Understanding the physically costly bits of information secured by Nakamoto's protocol as discrete sections of surface area on a geometric Gabriel's Horn.