Avatar
Pleb⚡
33c47c54d9cca7afe9274cda812297a0d5918faa63fc786207c96b9a924bcd58
Ex-shitcoiner. A fan of BTC, Muse, Milton Friedman, and Eichiro Oda

After watching Jeff Booth on What Bitcoin Did,

When he says that we use the wrong metric (GDP growth) to measure economic growth, it should be how fast price decreasing instead.

it occurs to me that maybe this shift on the metric that define success / growth will mess up a lot of AI in the future when hyperbitcoinization happen. Maybe the AI won't have the ability to think and shift it's dependent variable / target variable to define success.

Then the AI will be confused and lost itself in confusion unable to find what the new KPI is

I am so in love with nostr since Amethyst enable custom reactions

Now I can put the proper emoji to react on each post.

No more the awkward likes, on post where the actual emotions should be laugh/anger/etc

BnB is holding out pretty well.

Will they survive yet another bear market?

If so, the next bull run will be full of shitcoin again, and it likely will be recursive ordinal

Let's hope that not gonna happen

Ah yes, operator cost too

Hmm, not really feasible then ya.. perhaps the closest one was Damus version of zap where zap sender can allocate part of the zap amount for Damus. But it's from sender instead of receiver.

Since client have more control than relay, then maybe relays that is run by client will continue to be the most basic public/free client then. And more high quality private client like wine still need to live based on subscription

Random ideas

What if a relay cost is covered by certain percentage/fixed amount of zap that goes to its subscriber.

Hence someone that doesn't receive any zap doesn't pay a dime

And someone that receive some zap contribute a bit to keep the lights on, as at the end of the day he is the main beneficiary of the zap

But with a cap on the amount of zap the relay can absorb. No more than the actual server cost

Would this make a good public relay?

#plebchain #nostr #nip

Just finished watching this documentary

All the gold bug in the video mention a lot of great points about the problems, but they just arrive at the wrong conclusion.

Some reasons why I think they are not a bitcoin Maxi despite the huge potential of them becoming a maxi are

1. They are too deep in gold, all their bag is in gold. Their business revolve around gold, etc. It's in their incentive to prop up gold

2. They aren't technical/digital literate enough to be able to think about the mindblowing aspect of digital native currency. They might also not understand the tech enough to be able to know that it is real scarcity, it can't be copy and pasted like other kind of data

https://youtu.be/MPSkhgXMPJ8

Binance on lightning

Random thought of the day

Gold bugs aren't just simply pre-coiner. Gold bugs are pre-BTC-Maxi

When USD failed the old generation may try to go back to gold standard then realize that it's impossible with global economy today. Then they will be BTC Maxi

Is 1milllion zap as in the amount? Or the frequency?

Should be frequency right? I thought we pass 1 million zap amount long time ago

If Charles De Gaulle is alive today, he will probably be a Bitcoin Maxi

Right? Just came across him a bit on the history of US gold reserve

Perfect. So it's always either money printing or central planning that cause massive inflation at the end of the day.

Thanks man. I'd love to zap you, but I can't, you don't seem to have lightning address on your profile