34
NeoLuddite
340d5970deb2b2970e05cead6a47806b36cf30a28136b8858e661a4e4cb4a21d
A little off Nothing but Fat thumbs and autocorrect Life is short, Smile!
Replying to Avatar Olga

With a table top rumba

Been in the back of my mind, regarding other things, but the news could use a revitalization locally. If the platform were to attract local muck rakers building communities here, larger networks would have to start to pay attention if for nothing else the competition. But this to would have to be organic to, maybe just the chat section of a new local new org.

Replying to Avatar Michael Matulef

At some point, Americans of all ideological stripes have to ask themselves a question: if one really believes 30 or 40 or 50 percent of the population is beyond redemption, utterly immoral, stupid, fascist, racist, or communist, what should be done? Should they be killed? Deported? Herded into camps? Re-educated against their will until they vote correctly? Forced into low-caste status, politically, socially, and economically? Tolerated, but punished in future elections?

Or should we listen to Mises, and elevate political separation, federalism, and localism to the highest political principles?

Top-down rule from DC isn't working, and in fact it's making people miserable and ready to think unthinkable thoughts about civil war. And for what? Miniscule policy differences between two parties that will never lift a finger against war, state power, entitlements, or the Fed?

It takes 70 million votes to control the White House, and the (deep) administrative state may be beyond the reach of even an overwhelming political majority. No matter where you sit ideologically, the risk of becoming a marginalized political minority grows as state power grows. It is time to stop trying to capture DC and start talking about realistic breakaway or federalist solutions, even under the umbrella of an ongoing federal state. The upcoming election won't settle our problems, but only make them worse. At least 50 or 60 million Americans, a group far larger than most countries, will be politically disenfranchised and ruled by a perceived hostile government no matter what candidates or parties prevail.

If breaking up seems unthinkable, so does civil war. Is it written in stone that 330 million people must live under one far-flung federal jurisdiction, no matter what, forever?

Jeff Deist

Yes

To each their own, I suppose

Did you just suggest a prank call campaign?

Try turning airplane mode on then off. Its usually a time issue. Your phone will update and sink time zones etc

It's a tough one, as an exemplar of dunning Kruger I poke at it.

First how to claw back from offenders, class action would probably be needed. Goodluck these orgs are intimate with their governing bodies, might makes right and the spoils of this war will only go to the lawyers.

Second, this will always be the case

If you want a system of fair "IP" you will have to build and defend it yourself.

Time for federated library's and smart contracts to govern them.

Unfortunately the war machine has already picked up these tools, the fights will be nasty.

I do agree and understand, what is complicated is how to unravel with the least amount of harm and to what end. I do see that bitcoin can reset the time preference horizon of the current system, as well as consolidate technolcal advancements buy incorporating them in to a new system of exchange and storage, but it is just a reset. The emperor has no clothes only because he's putting on new clothes. The kid flipping burgers has not escaped the debt and servitude promised by his ancestors (government). Their entire society and government are the combined result of it, there is no rite or wrong or morality to it. As you say the minimum wage is always 0, so every thing else is just perception, a tool to analyze, measure, manipulate. I dont believe I'm trying to argue just using what you said to ramble myself.

Sorry for the rambling, thank you for your time