it's already impossible to not run into bitcoiners and IT'S GONNA GET WORSE

QUACK mothafucka

Quack?

I don’t allow a lot of “we” statements for me but in this case; I’ll allow it. 🫡

Lots of very smart people (I try to only listen to smart) think that the last bull run was cut short due to Chinas mining ban. Add in the Covid scam & I think they are right.

Rightsizing BTC to $115K or so PRIOR to the actual BULL RUN/Squeeze is not hopium.

We were bamboozled by the system last time. BTC hates that. The world is correcting. Just an observation but an educated one.

The squeeze already started. The market is slowly figuring it out

Accelerate 🫡

I don't tell my friends I own Bitcoin. I don't go to Bitcoin conventions. I don't wear Bitcoin merch. I don't buy hardware wallets or any Bitcoin-related items. I don't use Bitcoin services that require KYC. I don't own physical books related to Bitcoin. I don't have Bitcoin stickers on my laptop. I don't try to orange pill normies or shop owners. I don't buy Bitcoin P2P in person. I don't talk about Bitcoin with anyone. If you break into my home, there is nothing there that would reveal that I am a bitcoiner.

I am not paranoid, I am merely taking proactive steps to protect my family and my coins against what will come in the future. Private life, peaceful mind.

#privacy #opsec #bitcoin

Hi, I am Dan Wedge, I am building a permaculture fresh-cut flower farm, and I am a loose Cannon.

If you're reading this note you'll continue to have a wonderful day ⚡

this means you could have a farmers market in the middle of nowhere with no internet connection and people could just pay each other digitally with nuts 😂

It will skew to have weight in the edges of the things you might consult.

Also, web-of-trust networks have far larger reach than is immediately apparent a due to exponentials

No clue

Thank you for your detailed response!

I now understand better why River chose to represent the graphic as such. I hope you can understand how passionate Bitcoiners are about being the sole controller of their bearer asset. And how unique that is. “Some kind of ownership” is not acceptable for a large share of us. That sacrifices a major core principle and strategic advantage of Bitcoin in a world of weak property rights.

As friendly feedback, I wish River would detail exactly what “Individuals” means on a graphic like this going forward. Or at least point to an appendix that does. Perhaps titling, “Bitcoin Investment Distribution” would be less misleading than “Ownership” language. I disagree and don’t think hot wallet means true ownership. Claim to ownership ≠ sole custodian. But maybe I’m thinking in idealistic terms rather than realistic TradFi terms in the TradFi world we’re still forced to operate in at some point.

Overall I appreciate you and River! It is important and meaningful work. I don’t mean to come off rude and overly-critical. nostr:note1vclsfndcx84yg6ajrpl5vrecj9h55zxxaut80nfkkvs28e55rmtqcpj95w