Avatar
royster⚡️
345d4593d868f029bab39c49fc9b11a7611b10b48a65e8151381d3115bfd95db
middle of the turtle stack attempting to ascend orange coin good

That John Adam’s quote…

“I must study Politicks and War that my sons may have liberty to study Mathematicks and Philosophy. My sons ought to study Mathematicks and Philosophy, Geography, natural History, Naval Architecture, navigation, Commerce and Agriculture, in order to give their Children a right to study Painting, Poetry, Musick, Architecture, Statuary, Tapestry and Porcelaine.”

Did you tell your wife? Was she impressed?

Ah yes the ‘ol’ reverse head and shoulders do dab. Very nice, very nice.

Replying to Avatar less

Butcher

Dr. Bear coming out of hibernation eh?

Against the Tyranny of the Alarm Clock: Reclaiming Our Mornings

In the quiet pre-dawn hush, before the first light spills across the horizon, the human body stirs with a wisdom older than civilization. Our circadian rhythm—an elegant internal clock shaped by thousands of years of sunrise and sunset—prepares us to wake, not with violence, but with grace. Yet in modern life, this natural order is shattered daily by the shrill tyranny of the alarm clock. Jarring, artificial, and intrusive, the alarm clock should be used only as a last resort. It severs us from our biological harmony, denies us the stillness we need to begin our days, and conditions us to start each morning in panic rather than presence.

Alarm clocks are not neutral tools. They are blunt instruments of modern life’s industrial demands, originally born of factory schedules and the need to regiment human productivity. When we allow ourselves to be wrenched from sleep by a digital screech, we override our body’s intuitive process of waking. Sleep scientists have shown that waking abruptly from deep sleep—especially during the wrong phase of the sleep cycle—disrupts hormonal balance, impairs cognition, and increases stress. Over time, this habitual interruption can compound fatigue rather than alleviate it. We trade the wisdom of our own biology for the artificial rhythm of machines.

Waking naturally, by contrast, allows the body to complete its sleep cycle, releasing cortisol gradually as the sun rises, signaling the body to wake gently and clearly. This process supports mood, energy, and mental clarity. The person who wakes with the sun or ambient light, who lets their eyes open softly in silence, enters the day in communion with life—not in resistance to it.

Furthermore, alarm clocks deny us one of the most important and overlooked human needs: stillness. The moment we wake is sacred. It is a liminal space between the mystery of sleep and the demands of the world. When we are jolted into consciousness and immediately thrown into motion, we miss the quiet opportunity to align our spirit, to reflect, to breathe. The time just after waking should be unhurried—a chance to greet the day intentionally, not reactively. Alarm clocks fracture this space and reinforce a culture that idolizes urgency over awareness.

There are, of course, times when an alarm is necessary—early flights, commitments, or rare schedule constraints. But these should be exceptions, not norms. The default approach should be to design our life in harmony with our body’s rhythm: dimming lights at night, avoiding screens, rising with natural light or gentle cues like a sunrise lamp or birdsong. When we structure our days to support the body’s innate cycle, we no longer need to be coerced into wakefulness.

In a world obsessed with control, the refusal to be startled awake is an act of sovereignty. To rise without alarms is not laziness—it is alignment. It is choosing health over haste, presence over productivity, and peace over panic. When we wake gently, we don’t just reclaim our mornings—we reclaim something of our humanity.

Let the alarm clock be your last resort, not your master. Let nature, not noise, be your call to rise.

Can you please redo this but make it so that my 4 year old understands?

Replying to Avatar Cal P

First note. Might as well go big. We have always asked the same questions and they're good questions because the answers aren't knowable. Why all this, what is all this. These questions logically lead to positing on the origin of things. Here's my take. And this is just for fun, just what makes sense to me, what works for me.

The cause of the observable, I will call God for ease of conversation. I do not see it as a he or a she or anthropomorphic in any way. It seems obvious to me that putting a face (or arms, legs, preferences, pronouns) to the origin is just our animal hubris filtering the cosmic scope through our lens. That's not big enough for me. That doesn't work. It needs to be too large for an understandable idea. So I will say It is both everything and nothing.

I propose there is an energy screen, on one side nothingness, the other side, here, awareness. God encompasses the extant and non-extant sides. When nothing is pushed through the screen we get the universe.

I like the Dao. That makes sense to me. I cannot truck something that must be asked for love, begged for favor, performed for or earned. Because that's not love. I believe in love and light and a positive force because those must be. Nothingness, before form or color, becomes force and light and that is love.

This origin could be a race of beings, the universe their terrarium. It could be a kid. It could be higher dimensions. I think probably it takes all these forms with its infinite iterations. For fun, I think God plays a game. The game is: push through the field from nothing to something and see if this is an iteration where God remembers it is God or if it's one of the times where God thinks it's something else, separate.

I think my job is to be amazed and the definition of God is mystery. I think all is one; wrinkles in a blanket look across the valley and think they are separate from that wrinkle over there. I am God-part like a star or a bug or a human or trash or gold.

I like the practice of doing nothing with purpose, letting things be exactly as they are and in so doing obtaining and doing all things.

I like the idea that to wrap my arms around the universe I must zoom inward not out.

I think the grand unifying theory of physics that aligns micro and macro systems is spiritual in nature. I think string theory is getting close to being a spiritual theory.

I think ultimately it is pointless and I think that is very good news. I think because life is not serious it is time to be kind and see what I can add to it. I don't think this means I shouldn't be angry or hate or kill or lust. I do not judge the human experience as wrong or right based off morals. I do not begrudge myself or anyone the full experience. I know what I prefer, kindness and love, but hate and anger are no less a part of The Way.

I like football and cooking and reading and mountains. I think we live in a strange time where truth is no longer denied us but rather buried in bullshit so maybe even harder to find.

Seems like a reasonable take. Thanks for sharing. I agree existence the universe ect is inherently Good, but do you think there is a moral arc to it? Does evil exist?

Probably New Jersey goes first from the initial exodus then after everyone finds out for a few years the New York pendulum swings