He is right for most cases. But nothing is impossible. E.g. you do not have to have as much muscle as Tate to be stronger than him. But you've got to know what you are doing.
Buffer mostly because of good and strong military. Which seems to be caused by proper buddhism. Because everywhere else in the world (except perhaps to some extent in some muslim countries) military is a total failure through and through.
I have never met a thai soldier/officer. I would love to.
LT - Lithuania. Yeah, p2p should remain an option always.
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark 🇩🇰 as the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA) looks to ban unhosted wallets, or as people with brains call it Bitcoin wallets
GFY, sincerely everyone with a private key holding a UTXO
https://coingape.com/danish-regulator-to-ban-unhosted-bitcoin-btc-wallets/
If this happens in my country, this could very well finally force me out on a pilgrimage to El Salvador. There is not enough bitcoin for sale in the black market in LT I am afraid.
Yes, absolutely. Very important observation. Thank you.
Yes, absolutely. Very important observation. Thank you.
The correct answer is:
The proper buddhism properly penetrated in all levels of society, especially the wealthy and the ruling class, both public and the puppet masters. There isn't actually much puppet mastery in Thailand, it seems. Wysiwyg. That is good, and that is also a result of proper buddhism.
Proper buddhism is the one based on the Pali Canon, not any other texts, and especially not any teachers. Especially not any other religions nor lack of one.
Humans still make mistakes, of course. But with proper buddhism sufficiently well rooted in the society, there is looooots of buffer.
There had been some attempts in the west to retain independence from the Matrix. Sir John Bradbury in UK, probably some in other places, Generalisimo Francisco Franco even copied almost the entire approach from Thailand involving military, monarchy and religion. But all eventually failed. All of Asia failed, except Thailand. Some muslim countries probably succeeded, but at a great cost of treason to their likeminded neighbours, or/and to their own societies.
Thailand succeeded while making only limited compromises on wellbeing of their own society.
Let's think and learn.
Thanks to interview with eye.am it is now clear what is causing the few wrong/not perfect ideas/decisions in Andrew Tate.
He is driven by pointless competition which is a subset of hatred and which is caused by lack of understanding of anattā.
To deserve to become richer (a.k.a. more powerful) than the bad governments and managers of companies, you need to understand exactly and in detail how they operate, what exactly makes them bad, and what exactly they should do if they wanted to be good. It is not enough to just be good in your heart. You have to have walked through all that ugly experience of living close to those baddies and have understood their ways, and yet remained good in your heart. If you have never had nor understood computers, you are not in the position yet.
I go to market in any non-westernized muslim country. I greet the merchants respectfully with as-salamu alaykum, I look respectful but not local, not muslim, but obviously I am a guest, a guest whom their king welcomed. And the merchants still do not treat me seriously.
What does this mean? This means that the society is rotten. It converts its open friendly guests who are looking for mutual benefit into enemies.
They have no right to cry babies when Bush/Obama easily convince their countries to move on Iraq, Syria, etc.
Democracy leads to hitlerism and leninism, and covidism. Always. Proven.
Christianity and islam lead to colonialism. It seems.
"bad" is defined either by the above 3, or I think it can also be simplified into this:
- don't limit nor contribute to limiting anybody's freedom, as that will worsen your Kamma.
An honest fight is an oxymoron. I don't fight good people. And whether bad person is bad because of hatred, greed or ignorance, I don't care, he does not get to choose the method nor time of the fight.
If I ever get engaged in any democratic setup, you can be certain that I am doing it against my will, how ever good a pretender I am. And will stab the democratic comrades in the back the first chance I get.
Democracy is the worst kind of government. In any type and any size of organisation.
Not to be confused with voluntary mutual agreements between parties. Nobody is governing anybody in this scenario.
If my occasionally sharp words are too strong for some, at least listen to this civilized talk:
No, they are not the same. For those who lived through it in their full grown up minds, justifying lockdowns is a terminal sin. While justifying Iraq invasion is like justifying Zalgiris's victory in Lithuanian Basketball League in 2007 - other than Iraqis and there friends nobody cares. Iraq was another world that nobody knew anything about - strangers. And it was their word that they were good against the word of our news that they were bad. No iraqi managed to prove his trustworthiness to me, become my friend, shine some light to me about the situation. Neither before, nor during, nor after. That is what you get for being a closed unopen culture. Partially, they as muslims deserved it.