Rules that could be avoided only by very exceptional individuals in the population, like less than 0.1% population, are enslavement. Or more like overpopulation. But enslavement of people is a whole new topic. I just want to eat and observe free animals.
Biden’s DOJ just released this letter written by the failed Trump assassin, Ryan Routh, in which he offers $150,000 to anyone who “finishes the job”.
So the Democrats have a bounty out on Trump’s head, and Biden’s DOJ are loudly advertising it to the public. These are essentially marching orders to the MSM-brainwashed sheep. The Dems are hoping more blue-haired, Ukraine-loving, Trump-hating lunatics, try to kill Trump. They aren’t even hiding it anymore.
If the shoe were on the other foot, and Trump supporter did this, the world would stop. There would be wall-to-wall coverage, town halls, burning cities, collegiate encampments, mass protests, riots, civil uprisings, sweeping censorship against all Trump supporters, etc. The Dems would be losing their minds and foaming at the mouth.
There will be no coexistence. This is war.
I am glad for you still. Surely reasonable amounts of milk alone should not kill you. Unlike alcohol 😉
I am like you with age and all the health, except I don't eat milk, eat a little selected vegetables and fruits, eat mostly meat of animals with horns, wild fish, and eggs. But most important exceptions are:
I hardly ever work (neither physical nor brain)
I read much
I learn a bit
Listen to music much
Be with city and nature sounds outside much
I don't exercise other than run 5 km like twice or once a week
I mostly lie down, don't sit unless I drive or eat
I don't drive much
I eat once a day, no snacks
I get much sun on full body daily
I smoke good cigars (not cigarillos) daily
I drink much black coffee and green tea
Yup, nostr:npub1hsg8yxvxr6h3zfny4v7l0rdrxv2zp28a7vjxn6ukcnrhlfrufgqqtppzsd is not enslaved, most insects, foxes, bears, mooses, bores, snakes, birds, fish. Not enough wild food for all people, but that is why you need to be rich, and why we do not need that many people if we want everyone to be rich.
Not quite. It is like casual alcoholic saying, "oh I don't get drunk" until his liver starts complaining and either motivates him to get straight, or he is a toast.
With milk, you "tolerate" it while only wearing man-boobs, and same on women but less visible due to unhealthy aesthetic standards for millenniums, until you get cancer, blame tobacco or your wonderful genes that tolerates milk, and usually toast yourself with chemo.
If we take one more step: if smb kills and eats smb who enslaves, is the first smb double virtuous? 🤔
So you are confirming what I wrote. It is fine to kill, it is not fine to enslave.
So it appears I was wrong on fats. Monounsaturated fats are not the devil. Omega-6 are. Tallow is very comparable to ghee butter, apparently. Still, the other factors against milk stand.
But then why is this?: I have not used for frying anything other than tallow for a very long time. Friends did not have any tallow, so we used ghee butter to fry the same meat as we always do. And it tasted to me like fried in vegetable oil, the taste I remember from years back. It tasted poor. How so?
Where were you when you discovered fruits & vegetables are bad for you, and all the government guidelines feeding you, your friends, and your family this narrative were based on straight-up fraud? https://nostpic.com/media/a3ce3b178db030c5bdcddd1aa7c9a9127ecb17f16f7daaf5d8216860b7588d3c/ef91a3e7b5687bcb0fcdaae8d21ac8fbf68a2bc2655835ea3370d51be6c7615a.webp
Dr. Zelenko was mentioned by Trump, then on X22 Report he drew my attention that running nose multiple times a winter is not a given, making me think, is any sickness really a given, the rest was downhill. Crowned by nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m linking to http://www.youtube.com/@ExcellentHealth .
Before that I was already onto something, having noticed on myself that living by a year round warm ocean and no milk products because of its hormones and as I then thought its fats, made me healthy. Also not too many fruits as they made me fat. But I had no idea about meat benefits nor seed oil and carb hazards.
To add even more: all tested for many years on me, and works like a charm.
To add to the health concerns, and actually that explains why those health hazards exist, there is also a moral side of the business:
It is OK to kill your food, whatever it is, an animal, a plant, a seed, an egg. But it is not OK to limit anybody's and anything's freedom even a slightest bit, including animals and even plants. So if the cow did not come from the woods ininvited and did not bring the milk to you in a bowl, did not put her nipple into your mouth, and you did not find the milk somewhere in nature in some sort of pool or nest, the milk is not OK, because it is obtained by abusing the animal. Same as it is not OK to keep any animal fenced nor catching a wild pig, cutting of one of its muscles for your food and letting it go. The same with milk. Babies have it, others don't have it.
To add to my other reply on fats, here are the other concerns about milk:
There are different kinds of fat. Fat types are not so much about specifically brain, it is overall body health. Explained in the note I attach.
Once you know that monounsaturated fats are bad for you, and start avoiding seed/vegetable oils, there is no point getting the same fats but from milk. But sure, 20% bad fat from milk is better than 100% of it from plant oils.
Sure, we can disagree there. But in terms of fats this is fact: only ~80% of its fat is saturated fat (saturated is the only one in any other parts of cattle), while the remaining 20% fat is monounsaturated, same as in all plants except palms and coconuts.
If you are avoiding seed / vegetable oils and love hard cheese, check its nutrition table to see proportions of saturated and monounsaturated fats 😁. Same in ghee butter.
Sorry guys, anything made from milk is also bad. Not just for this reason.
Maybe natural sour milk once a year is fine...
Dear Alex, sir. You seem to be the problem.
Not true. But sadly most people are indeed like you say. I hate those.
The #Quran is correct about riba. It is correct when it says that #God will declare war on usurers. We're about to see it. I'm a Christian, and I can see that this is correct.
I just listened to nostr:nprofile1qqsyx708d0a8d2qt3ku75avjz8vshvlx0v3q97ygpnz0tllzqegxrtgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0appv40 talking with Saylor. TBH, it might be better if the big shots aren't thinking about an economy without credit. That will scare them. They won't get it.
But... Bitcoin is going to bring Islamic finance to the world. They won't call it that, that's for sure. Maybe they'll convince Muslims that they've actually adopted Bitcoin finance. But it won't matter - its the same thing.
I really liked Saif's explanation of why the cost of capital should approach zero. I only got a standard Keynesian education, and only undergrad, so I haven't heard that before. It sounds correct to me. Basically, as savings accumulate, you're willing to accept lower and lower yields because you have more and more savings over time - this is imperceptibly gradual, a generational shift. Its the utility curve applied to savings. I'd add that accumulated capital in a country can also count as savings - meaning buildings, machinery, improved land, etc.. The lower yield in that sense is visible in companies pursuing lower yielding operations as well as speciation of niches the economy supports.
Bitcoin's killer feature is immutable scarcity. If the whole world is using #bitcoin, and there's bitcoin loans that can't be repaid, well, too bad. The lender is shit outta luck. The borrower also has the option to abscond, if they think they can get away with it. Oops, shit outta luck. So, in the short run, the cost of capital is going to be high. Too high. In the long run, countries that continue the debt-yield model are going to find themselves with no money. Then you get the bad kind of anarchy, which maybe might turn into the good anarchy. No anarchy is good for governments.
There's a fork in the road in front of us. If we take the left path, the path of credit, we get the Mark of the Beast (again - not the first time). It won't matter if we dodge the CBDCs. Why? Because borrowers won't be trusted, and some mechanism will be required to basically enslave them. Probably everybody. Could be government registered wallets that interface with tracking implants. Maybe some other arrangement. They'll hermetically seal the bitcoin into the country via surveillance and checkpoints. Not good... Probably the beginning of humanity's extinction.
The right hand path is Islamic finance. That sounds scary, but it really just means that people have an alternative to debt. Instead of borrowing 5k sats to "buy" a car, your rich uncle buys the car and leases it to you, with the car as collateral. The lease might not be periodic payments, but simply a payment at a future date, for a different amount than you bought - the market will have to determine how amortization affects the return payment. This is really very simple - much simpler than our current system of monthly payments for three times as long as the car retains any value. Instead of enslaving the human, as in the path of credit, the material possession is enslaved as collateral. The bitcoin gets to flow freely, and no surveillance is required.
I expect both paths to be tried simultaneously. Countries that try to replicate credit on bitcoin will not survive. The Quran says that God will declare war on them, and I can't remember if it also says society will go insane or if that was an interpretation by a scholar, but we can already see that happening. Its a good thing God is merciful - we do have a chance, if we repent and actually understand. If you think none of this matters because its not from the Bible, think again. The Bible constantly compares sin with debt with interest, starting from Genesis, if you read it in Hebrew, or Greek in the NT. Our English versions have been edited. Go to a synagogue and ask, if you have the balls. Being a real Christian takes work. What, you thought it was gonna be easy? I'm not your pastor, I get no financial gain from telling you sweet nothings.
Here's the discussion between Saif and Saylor. And thanks nostr:nprofile1qqs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kueg6g89xw for causing me to listen to this.
Honestly, one can try to walk around or soften it all he wants, but eventually every single one, who thinks that profiting while not working (or working on products that only smb else is supposed to consume, not you) while others work on stuff you use is acceptable, will have to get physically extinct. If I was one of them, I would choose not to have children and would hope to have enough time to die naturally.
But also men would not be obsessed with fucking for reasons other than having children, if not for the governmental indoctrination.
In any societies where there are no greater organisational units than a village of like 20 families and no funny single god religions, there is no obsession with sex. 100% true.
