Subnostr

Tybbs

34a199b925388816138f8953e67b5ec6e323c30f9269403627316b39a84ea18b

✨Being Superstitious is Bad Luck✨ MS Statistics & Data Science Bitcoin & Monero Grand Canyon State 780087

Here are some examples of some prominent scientists and archaeologists who have called Homo habilis and Homo erectus humans:

Louis Leakey: In 1975, Leakey called Homo habilis "the first human." Leakey argued that Homo habilis was the first species to make and use stone tools, which he saw as a defining characteristic of humanity.

Richard Leakey: Richard Leakey, Louis Leakey's son, also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "The Making of Mankind," Leakey wrote that Homo habilis was "the first member of our own genus, Homo."

Donald Johanson: Donald Johanson, the discoverer of the famous Lucy skeleton, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind," Johanson wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species that we can confidently call human."

Mary Leakey: Mary Leakey, Louis Leakey's wife, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In her book "Olduvai Gorge," Mary Leakey wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species in the genus Homo."

Tim White: Tim White, an American paleoanthropologist, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "Pleistocene Hominid Evolution in East Africa," White wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species in the genus Homo to have a brain size comparable to that of modern humans."

You learnt something new today, have a great time.

if this isn't an AI-assisted response, I'm very impressed with the write up.

seems far too formulaic and well-backed to be written by you in such a short time.

totally okay with being wrong on this, but the response's tone just gives me GPT vibes

Here are some examples of some prominent scientists and archaeologists who have called Homo habilis and Homo erectus humans:

Louis Leakey: In 1975, Leakey called Homo habilis "the first human." Leakey argued that Homo habilis was the first species to make and use stone tools, which he saw as a defining characteristic of humanity.

Richard Leakey: Richard Leakey, Louis Leakey's son, also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "The Making of Mankind," Leakey wrote that Homo habilis was "the first member of our own genus, Homo."

Donald Johanson: Donald Johanson, the discoverer of the famous Lucy skeleton, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind," Johanson wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species that we can confidently call human."

Mary Leakey: Mary Leakey, Louis Leakey's wife, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In her book "Olduvai Gorge," Mary Leakey wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species in the genus Homo."

Tim White: Tim White, an American paleoanthropologist, has also called Homo habilis "the first human." In his book "Pleistocene Hominid Evolution in East Africa," White wrote that Homo habilis was "the first species in the genus Homo to have a brain size comparable to that of modern humans."

You learnt something new today, have a great time.

indeed. I also learned to remember that the line of what is human and what is not human with regards to our evolution is very much blurred. evolving and becoming what we today call homo sapiens was not an instantaneous event, but rather a process that occurred across our whole population.

while I still think it is a bit disinformative to say "humans had been hunter gatherers for millions of years", I do not think it is untrue to say that humans have been hunter gatherers far longer than we have been anything else.

the language we use to talk about these things is certainly not precise enough to convey exact meaning within a few sentences.

They all come from the hominin lineage.

The earliest known species of the genus Homo is Homo habilis, followed by Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, and eventually Homo sapiens.

The word "human" is not even an actual scientific term.

On what basis you're fact checking me, British English and American English? There is some debate about the definition of "human," but it is not a scientific debate.

That's why most of the books refer homo sapiens as anatomically modern humans.

And you're literally fact-checking a god damn meme. This is such a pseudo-intellectuals behaviour.

I will admit, I didn't think about homo erectus or any of our ancestors before then when I made the comment above.

it's also okay to admit that modern day humans have not been around for millions of years.

we can both be right

nice as hominem btw

ad*

lmfao autocorrect hates me

I don't want to explain this here. Just do one Google search.

There are hundreds of books that make a case for this exact theory, written by people who have dedicated their entire lives to understanding the Industrial Revolution and its impacts. You just woke up one day and decided to dismiss everything? Wow, you are completely delusional.

I am 22 years old. What is your age?

nice as hominem btw

I don't want to explain this here. Just do one Google search.

There are hundreds of books that make a case for this exact theory, written by people who have dedicated their entire lives to understanding the Industrial Revolution and its impacts. You just woke up one day and decided to dismiss everything? Wow, you are completely delusional.

I am 22 years old. What is your age?

I'm not dismissing. I'm agreeing that the industrial revolution had dire consequences for the human race. our boy Ted Kaczynski knew that a long time ago.

im adding on top of that and saying if the industrial revolution had consequences, then then surely the advent of agriculture had dire consequences as well. we know this to be true. as you say, it's in the literature

I'm 21 so not unlike yourself

They all come from the hominin lineage.

The earliest known species of the genus Homo is Homo habilis, followed by Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, and eventually Homo sapiens.

The word "human" is not even an actual scientific term.

On what basis you're fact checking me, British English and American English? There is some debate about the definition of "human," but it is not a scientific debate.

That's why most of the books refer homo sapiens as anatomically modern humans.

And you're literally fact-checking a god damn meme. This is such a pseudo-intellectuals behaviour.

so if you want to say hominim, and that's what you mean to say, then say it.

say what you mean and mean what you say

They all come from the hominin lineage.

The earliest known species of the genus Homo is Homo habilis, followed by Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, and eventually Homo sapiens.

The word "human" is not even an actual scientific term.

On what basis you're fact checking me, British English and American English? There is some debate about the definition of "human," but it is not a scientific debate.

That's why most of the books refer homo sapiens as anatomically modern humans.

And you're literally fact-checking a god damn meme. This is such a pseudo-intellectuals behaviour.

not the meme, I agree with the meme. only had an issue with the caption. we can argue semantics and scientific literature all you like, but in British or American English "human" usually refers to the people we see all around us, the ones that make up modern society, homo sapiens.

It often happens that we humans, aka Homo sapiens, frequently forget about our ancestors, Homo habilis and Homo erectus, who lived on Earth for millions of years.

Regarding the second statement, that is debateable.

However, significant milestones in the commercialization of the food supply can be traced back to the Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century.

Correct me if I am wrong!

I agree with you on the second point, but if we continue with that thinking, then it's not unreasonable to say the the "spoilage" began with the advent of agriculture

It often happens that we humans, aka Homo sapiens, frequently forget about our ancestors, Homo habilis and Homo erectus, who lived on Earth for millions of years.

Regarding the second statement, that is debateable.

However, significant milestones in the commercialization of the food supply can be traced back to the Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century.

Correct me if I am wrong!

sure, but those ancestors are not "humans". only homosapiens are typically considered human. if you instead qualified your statement with "humans and their common bipedal ancestors were hunter gatherers for millions of years" then it would be accurate. reading your original statement as is, however, it is incorrect.

Darn kids these days don't know what it was like to chase a caribou 30 miles on foot. Spoiled brats!

don't forget that it was uphill both ways and in the snow

For millions of years, humans were primarily hunter-gatherers, but recently, we have become spoiled.

Fact Check:

first humans appeared only 300,000 years ago by most estimates.

agricultural revolution was 12,000 years ago which is hardly recent. industrial revolution is more recent

think and read before you post

nostr:nevent1qqsxnfj3pr2np85yv9fc85uwvjyw0jv8xwnf6q90nff7l4ylvathxccpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygxx7urh795e65x0j25k22l7hlavqh7xss4eacu3pzwetxu26h2gl5psgqqqqqqsketqdd

For millions of years, humans were primarily hunter-gatherers, but recently, we have become spoiled.

this is blatantly incorrect. the first humans are commonly understood to have appear only 300,000 years ago. not millions. additionally, you can hardly consider the agricultural revolution "recent"

please do some fact checking before making erroneous claims

stayed out late at a Chinese bar and made some new friends #chinachain #bartime

now they're playing Taylor swift 🙄

Replying to b75b9a31...

goddam

the malls here are filled with kid's-bop

it was so hot out #chinachain #photography

thanks for the boost nostr:npub1fhpw2ux9flhcxyl6xp84996qgnkkcy59zqzjvq9fhpxcx7upymus69ds8n

Replying to nobody

I almost get the body clock to post

#nostr

sexy sexy girl

I love these pics

so glad you like em :)

Load More