I think nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqnz0fd0 might be the one who coined it.
First time I heard about it was this article by nostr:npub1xapjgsushef5wwn78vac6pxuaqlke9g5hqdfjlanky3uquh0nauqx0cnde.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/everyone-needs-an-uncle-jim
It predates that article by close to a decade.
nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx how goes the scam shitbag?
How goes the scam?
I am next to a grumpy old man. He hates Nostr.
That is the most backwards nonsense I've ever heard. That is exactly what the block size wars DID prove.
Progressivism needs a revamp. A return to revolutionary, forward thinking, change-making.
Economically literate, not performative for the sake of performance.
Anti-war, anti-corruption and anti-authoritarians (be it government or corporate)
Powered by Bitcoin. nostr:npub1fpcd25q2zg09rp65fglxuhp0acws5qlphpg88un7mdcskygdvgyqfv4sld
The deviation into the current insanity is why I drifted away from the left. Especially the economic denialism and illiteracy.
So you backed down from baseless assertions to concern trolling because you can't defend your insertions. lmao
You are a moron. YOU made the assertions here in this thread, not me. It is on YOU to defend your assertions.
Don't be like this moron. Clueless, overconfident, and spewing baseless nonsense. There are too many people like this in this ecosystem literally conducting a Denial of Service attack on any adult or logic based conversation regarding upgrades to Bitcoin.
Point 1: CTV does absolutely nothing to change "spam transactions" as something that can happen on Bitcoin. All CTV does is commit to chains of transactions, exactly like pre-signed transactions do now, except enforcing them by consensus. It makes zero difference on any level to people's ability to flood the network with long chains of transactions.
Point 2: CTV cannot do recursion, period, full stop. That was an explicit design goal. It cannot create circular chains of transactions either, _that is impossible under the laws of information theory_. Transactions must reference transaction IDs, once one transaction with ID A is spent, that TXID cannot be recreated, ever. Full nonsense gibberish.
Point 3: Nothing about CTV creates a risk of walled gardens at all. Self custody not scaling, and forcing people to use Coinbase, or Cashapp, or River, creates the risk of walled gardens. The only way for most people to use Bitcoin being with the permission of a custodian creates the risk of walled gardens. This is incoherent.
This moron VERY clearly just regurgitated incoherent ChatGPT hallucinations to try to participate in a conversation he doesn't understand the first thing about. That is a Denial of Service attack. Don't be like this moron. If you want to participate in these conversations, than be humble and recognize the limits of your current understanding, and work to expand the horizon of your understanding.
Don't regurgitate incoherent bullshit to argue a dogmatic position you don't even understand the logic behind.
nostr:note14tyuluxcsc9keszlxtq3f3y5redy7mhlvgpyzzvyhgpfjd36d49s2lvpw9
You are the one making assertions about negative consequences to a specific proposal, all factually bullshit, and it is on YOU as the one making those specific assertions to defend them.
You can't even exercise logic properly.
No, its not. You are the one who just made a bunch of assertions.
