I love when their hopeless ideologies encounter intersectionality đ€Ł
This point cannot be overstated. The state adores having NPCs perform their dirty work for a wage.
Welcome to the UK, where you now get ticketed for... Cycling no handed.
Side note: the physiognomy checks out yet again
https://video.nostr.build/e2f70cd76de9939cd8d389cc8878e45b2c2a50ce826e2b1045f88c8dc3758655.mp4
They mock us all out in the open and it's so tiring. Thankfully their bloodlust is waking up people every day.
https://nitter.net/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1940182442767245815
COVID being a patsy to blame on China as cover for a US bioweapon seems more and more difficult to deny.
Genetically targeted bioweapon created by the US military is the most plausible theory IMO.
People in denial will call this fake.
This isn't flat earth theory. It is testing two hypothesis and then trying to invalidate the results. 46 data points show is that the claimed rate of curvature doesn't exist.
Refraction is taken into account. As it stands people using snells law tend to vastly overestimate the effects of refraction, which tends to be no more than 10%.
There's a 5 hour video in the post that will address any points you may have.
People say they can't think of a business to start, but this just goes to show there are opportunities everywhere.
Celestial theodolite measurements are a huge problem for the claimed rate of curvature, and these observations are the strongest evidence that is accessible for anyone to verify themselves.
Measurements and analysis by Dr. Mike Heffron.
"Whatâs Being Measured?
Observers at known elevations and coordinates are sighting distant peaks (like Pikes Peak, Blodgett Peak, Cheyenne Mountain, etc.).
They use the observed elevation angle (El) of the peak, as determined by the background star field, to calculate the apparent altitude of the distant peak.
This is compared to the expected altitude based on two models:
Flat Earth (FE): Simple trigonometry, no curvature drop.
Globe Earth (GE): Includes the "drop" due to earthâs curvature over the distance, plus (optionally) atmospheric refraction correction.
How Are the Results Presented?
Each observation yields a ÎAlt (Delta Altitude): the difference between the measured peak altitude and the expected value for each model.
The spreadsheet gives these as:
FE ÎAlt ATM off: Flat earth model, no atmospheric correction.
GE ÎAlt ATM off: Globe earth model, no atmospheric correction.
GE ÎAlt ATM on: Globe earth model, with atmospheric correction (using G.G. Bennettâs refraction formula).
Interpretation:
Flat Earth Model: The ÎAlt values are consistently close to zero, typically within ±1 meter, with small random scatter. This means the measured peak altitude matches the flat earth trigonometric prediction almost perfectly, within experimental error.
Globe Earth Model: The ÎAlt values are all large negative numbers, typically in the range of -100 to -200 meters. This means the measured peak altitude is much higher than the globe model predictsâit appears the distant peak is âtoo highâ by over 100 meters, every time.
Atmospheric Refraction: The correction for standard refraction (using Bennettâs formula) is negligible compared to the discrepancy. The numbers with and without refraction are almost identical, so refraction cannot account for the difference.
What Does This Mean Physically?
Letâs use calculus and trigonometry to illustrate:
On a globe: The drop due to curvature over distance dd is Îh=d^2/2R, where R is the earthâs radius. For 50 km, thatâs about 196 meters.
On a flat plane: No drop, so the only thing that matters is the observerâs and targetâs elevations and the angle.
The data show that the observed peak altitudes match the flat calculation, not the globe calculation. The globe model predicts the peaks should be âhiddenâ or much lower, but they are not.
Conclusion: What Does the Data Falsify?
No evidence of curvature drop: The data do not show the predicted drop for a globe of radius 6371 km.
No evidence that atmospheric refraction âsavesâ the globe model: The correction is far too small.
Direct geometric measurement: The earthâs surface, as measured by these star-referenced long-distance sights, behaves as if it is flat and stationary over these scales.
The data in this spreadsheet show, over and over, that the measured altitudes of distant peaks match flat earth trigonometry and deviate dramatically from the predictions of the globe model. No amount of standard atmospheric refraction can account for the discrepancy. This is a direct, geometric, repeatable, and verifiable measurementâno curvature detected!1.
Physics is about measurement, and measurement is king! If the data do not fit the model, the model must be questioned. In this experiment, the globe model is not just offâitâs off by orders of magnitude compared to the measurement precision.
Thats a GG folks."
Judging by some responses you've received on nostr, this isn't surprising. Full of fallacious logic and ad hominem attacks, and expectedly coming from "experts" who still haven't understood that peer-review is largely captured and unlikely to provide any significant breakthroughs as the system now functions to primarily maintain funding for their junk science and shame anyone who challenges their beliefs as having a mental illness.
https://blossom.primal.net/a72ad7feaeed3dbff7a7c02459fa6594209ed71e453b8bf6000dfdd0bdd89359.mp4
I will never let any wireless *anything* touch my head.
Even when I'm on a phone call, I'm that guy using speaker and holding it a few inches away from my face.
The frequencies emitted by modern devices are well known to cook soft tissue, which will literally give you micro amounts of brain damage every time you do it.
Remember: the "studies" people point to to tell you "wireless wearables are totally fine and safe!" are all bought and paid for by the Big Tech companies themselves. It's all a sham for them to cover their asses, and ultimately profits.
It is clearly a dumb idea to pump non-native frequencies into sensitive organs, so just say no.
It's so normalised that you become an outlier if you don't use these things. The companies selling these products have an interest in ignoring any harms they pose.
Well, the scam has to make some sense for people to accept it.
Same as with the covid shot, where you were considered 'unvaccinated' for 2 weeks following your shot, and that's exactly the period where if any serious side-effects were to occur, they would happen.
That way they can classify people who died following their shot as unvaccinated. It's the same pattern over and over. Best I can tell is that vaccines have been a scam since inception.
Experts call this a coincidence.
"Cases of polio within 10 days of vaccination were classified as 'unvaccinated,' and the definition of polio itself was rewritten to make the vaccine look more effective."
https://blossom.primal.net/59a3a9bd04c8de10670e6b75ea8db303ed9cdb59a400eeea2d15f6eb8d27932e.mp4
An atheist position allows this to happen. Also money.
Water doesn't follow a curve.
Ironically, we need more censorship on other platforms so that nostr adoption grows.
The banker presumes himself an expert, but alas....
Fantasy inception
There's a pattern out there...
I believe it is somewhat similar, yes. But the idea behind LIPUS is stimulating microtubules rather than breaking down amyloids.
Ultrasound is also increasingly being used and studied for ALS and Parkinson's, and it's suitable for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) among other organs.
I hadn't heard about that being a thing until Doge
Covert tech wouldn't be used in the open, that's why it's covert.
War. Fuck the system!
Eyes out for false flags that would drag other countries in.
I last bought some at $110, spent most of it and sold the rest when it pumped from that exchange hack. I'm usually wrong, but it's not a good time to be buying.
Sterling puts out good info on this.
28/29 months since I last bought some
Just one of only a few. Most of them are bought an paid for.
Imagine spending a few hundred k one degree only to learn the industry is a scam. Most can't cope.
We don't need to imagine what it would be like to be alive during a genocide and to understand how people would act.
I feel like COVID made this sort of apathy all the more possible.
Pakistani terrorism, India has given Pakistani nationals direction to leave the country and has now cut off most of the water supply to Pakistan.
I'm only 40, hopefully I'm around to see it come down. I think a possible catalyst will be overunity, and that will dismantle not only the climate and energy scam, but also the physics we have so severely been misled on.