versatile = literally only works in the context of HTML pages

it seems you're looking for a full-fledged Nostr REPL or a TUI Nostr client. I also want that, but I don't think nostcat should become that. keep nostcat simple!

yes, it is horrible

what I get from this is that "repost" is copying the contents of a post and posting it with your own name, which is a manual action that on nostr will mean just creating a new kind-1 event with the copied contents and no tags.

or like the old twitter retweets, that were just copy-pastes with the "RT" prefix.

I think we should strive to not have two ways of doing the same thing, as that will only create an unnecessary burden on all implementors.

I guess I'm not in the corpus they gave this bot to read but how to use android camera from C is.

can you ask it to give you links to blogs from people that talk about some specific topic? I mean make it work more like a search engine instead of giving you a single answer to a question.

no way

Installing ruby-3.0.4...

unfortunately you were just banned from nostr for saying these things.

well, considering that spotify has millions of people who never even heard of spotify that number doesn't mean much, right?

I hereby submit this https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/85 NIP proposal for remote signing of events for your appreciation.

interesting

very good, lucky woman

what are furries?

you can, because you are portuguese. don't let brazilians do that.

I don't know if this is what you're talking about here, but I've seen many talks and theses about how the way we write programs is old and should have been replaced already, then suggesting some ways that could have replaced our glorious text files.

immediately after, I see people trying to put these ideas in practice, but 100% of the times the way they put the ideas in practice is by writing some programs in a text file.

small scope, large name? in the sense that if a function is doing very little it should have a very big name? or if it is going to be used only in a very limited way it should have a big name?

a great plot by the elites to control you

I think there are many things that work in english and not in portuguese. for example, in english it is very easy to create new words by just adding a suffix of -ness, -ful, -less, -ship, -ation and others to any verb and make a substantive, in portuguese there is no such a thing and people have been trying to do it here all the time and the results are often horrible.

in english you can also turn substantive into verbs by just prefixing them with the word "to". so microphone (subs) becomes a the verb "to microphone". in portuguese they would do "microfonear" and that is often ridiculous.

(I'm just making this up as I write so the theory might contain holes)