No, you don't! Where is that?
Auto-translate is the most dumb retarded thing ever created.
#[2] #[4] #[3]
Yes, pictures would help.
Users are not tied to relays. Their client may be fluid. Take a look at https://mikedilger.com/gossip-relay-model.mp4.
But they could also rebroadcast notes they reply to that they got from other relays to the relays they normally write to, so their followers that know about these relays may easily fetch the notes.
Or other approaches can be done.
Currently most clients use the dumbest approach you can imagine, as far as I know, except, so far, https://github.com/mikedilger/gossip, which uses the model described in the video above.
You're saying you want all relays to store all the data in the entire world. That will not scale.
Instead clients should adopt the Gossip Model and start being smart about how to find posts from people:
I agree.
Take a look at https://nostr.net/.
Nothing really good so far, except for https://github.com/Galaxoid-Labs/Seer, which is very promising.
Use clients that keep your follower list local so you can always recover it from there:
- https://github.com/mikedilger/gossip
Why is it bad for privacy?
Everything is bad for privacy, but is connecting to 10 relays really that worse?
I can't read the event you're replying to, in which relay is it?
https://coracle.social/ allows you to use your own provider I think.
We need more of these exercises (like this note that was only published to https://eden.nostr.land) to ensure clients are good about how they deal with relays: #[0]
I see it.
Because all clients are querying all relays for all the things at once. That cannot possibly scale.
Finally!