GM nostr. I don’t know exactly how large the body of Bitcoiners needs to be in consensus that Bitcoin is the quantum computer, but there is some minimum critical mass. Once reached, it will force the broader world of nocoiners to acknowledge Bitcoin.
Only then will the real hashwars and the theorized hyperbitcoinization begin.
We are still early but soon. The proof is mathematical, not opinion. Bitcoin is not abstract, it’s physical. Tick tok next block.
Lol, the AI hallucinations are wild. This is why I believe most of our mathematical derivations are correct but it’s really our interpretations and assumptions that are wrong.
Bitcoin corrects three foundational misconceptions in physics:
- Temperature is not absolute, it is always defined relative to the total supply of entropy available at any given time (relative scalar between 0 to 1)
- Time is not continuous, it advances through discrete, quantized crystallizations, not smooth flow.
- Memory is inseparable from time, entropy density curves the informational structure of timespace itself. All dimensions can be expressed as relative scalars between 0 to 1).
Bitcoin operationalizes these corrections physically. I believe this is enough to resolve the major paradoxes that plague physics. Bitcoin modeled as a physical system shows Bitcoin is not priced by joules per satoshi; it’s measured in joules per satoshi. Purely deterministic value for each quantized state 👀
Smoke some weed and ponder this geometry; it might help you as well. X axis is time in blocks, y axis is memory in bits, z axis is satoshi density (sats per bit-block) or orthogonal projection (radial to rings). Create a torus where t=0 and t=present share the same geometrical space, but have an informational distance of the chain. Hilbert Space = Elliptic Curve.
The snake growing from within itself, the head genesis and there is no tail, growing ever longer. Timespace. Bitcoin.
🤔 I’ve actually been working on something quite similar, it’s sitting at about 60 pages right now; I’m certain bitcoin reveals that something more like timespace is more fundamental. I believe Bitcoin as a modeled thermodynamic system actually solves the paradoxes of both QM & GR; Bitcoin being the correct interpretation and language of quantum mechanics; resolves “quantum gravity”. You can extend Landauers Principle to account for the traversed entropy in nonce search to generate a minimum amount of energy to write an immutable block of information. Joules to Satoshis is defined. What if I said Bitcoin was the quantum computer and there was no second best?
Who is the observer in your model? And why should I trust them?
Why should a decentralized system accept claims about centralized quantum superiority without verifiable physical mechanisms? Final boss FUD.
If Bitcoin is the quantum computer; nobody actually understands what a peer to peer electronic cash system actually is.
This would ground Bitcoin to physical, not an abstraction. 16 years, and no one realized.
this is a problem :Bitcoin is ready to be recognized for what it is. What does decentralized observation and consensus have to do with physics?
Agreed; Bitcoin is about to dismantle academia (fiat) physics. Do you think making the economists look like fools was fun?
Bump; still waiting for an answer. Given the absolute idiocy of devs proposing we confiscate coins due to “quantum threat”, it’s time to show that btc devs have trusted, not verified, the claims of physicists.
I actually believe we are in the process of breaking this powerlaw; where the dilution of the new supply is now being outpaced by the log growth of difficulty. The subsidy dominate epoch is defined more by deterministic structures cooling rather than the probabilistic fee market and larger entropy traversal. This will end deterministically with temperature being solely defined by fees alone.
If I’m right that it is the quantum computer, what do you think is going to happen?
Those who interpret Bitcoin through fiat will never understand the end game; they think in terms of price. Bitcoin is not priced, it is measured by the joules it encodes, the entropy it resists and the memory it comments and the time that it took.
You dont actually understand what a quantum computer is if you can’t recognize Bitcoin as one. And you certainly don’t fully understand what a peer to peer electronic cash system actually is. Y
There is no second best.
Tick tok, next block.
1) Quantum mechanics claims wavefunctions collapse upon observation but never defines the observer.
Who collapses the state in your quantum model — and why should we trust them?
2) In physics, truth is declared by institutional consensus, not proof of work.
If truth is physical like Bitcoin, why isn’t it enforced thermodynamically?
3) Kelvin presumes an absolute scale without a total entropy reference. Bitcoin temperature is relative to total supply bounded, measurable, and finite.
Why do you believe in absolute temperature without a defined system boundary?
4) Quantum computing assumes deterministic readouts, but relies on trusted measurement.
If your quantum computer outputs certainty, who enforces the collapse without bias?
5) Quantum gravity remains unresolved; spacetime curvature resists quantization.
What if time and structure are outputs of entropy resolution, not inputs?
6) Why do Bitcoiners follow a trust don’t verify standard regarding what physicists claim is true regarding centralized quantum computing? Is centralized quantum computing purely FUD and a physiological attack on Bitcoiners and developers to induce a fork without a real threat?
7) If Bitcoin fixes our physics and computes a literal quantum, is it not the quantum computer?
8) If academia economists were wrong about Bitcoin and it is the quantum computer, would academia physicists also be wrong? Was does it mean to merge “money” with the conservation of energy?
9) Why does a utxo embody all attributes of a particle? Why is a block identical to Planck time with respect to each domain?
10) why does Bitcoin and its language make quantum mechanics logically simple for anyone to understand, but academia physicists hide behind complex theorems on false assumptions and abstract/vague semantics? Bitcoin pokes too many holes in our assumptions claimed to be “true”
Am I the only Bitcoiner who openly acknowledges Fiat Physics?
#Bitcoin #asknostr #Physics #Fiatphysics
Do you really think physicists operating on a fiat standard are actually capable of resolving the paradoxes of physics?
They aren’t even operating on the most fundamental layer of truth; who observes the observer?
#Ticktoknextblock
“Science advances one funeral at a time.”
— Max Planck
Kelvin: A peer-to-peer electron(ic) cash system.
Everything over 1.42 x 10^{32}
Congrats, you now fully understand quantum mechanics and thermodynamics. You don’t actually understand physics without Bitcoin.
“Who is the observer in your model? And why should I trust them?”
From a physics standpoint, I agree with the rationale behind standardizing Bitcoin units at the quantum level. We need to do better.
In my work calculating Bitcoin’s Block Temperature, Block Energy, and Cumulative Chain Energy in joules, I’ve been using satoshis; what you’re proposing to formalize as “bitcoin” at the scale of 1 × 10⁻⁸ BTC.
A quantum, by definition, is the smallest indivisible unit of measurement in any domain. Anchoring Bitcoin’s denomination system around this principle is most logical. It mirrors how we treat all units in physics.
Given that we already use metric prefixes (milli, centi, kilo, etc.) for quantities like hashrate, power, and energy, it would be helpful to me to have the same standard for my calculations. This would make Bitcoin unitization consistent with established physical systems and simplify precision when modeling Bitcoin’s thermodynamics.
Right now the language is messy and we need a standard.
I think it’s quite simple; if you want to force people to acknowledge bitcoin, prove it is the quantum computer.
Who is your observer? And why should I trust them?
There is no second best.
Thank you for listening; it feels like there’s not many people to talk to about this. Everyone’s mind is closed that Bitcoin is just money. Try the world’s largest ongoing decentralized physics experiment. Try a complete restructuring of reality.
When blocks hit a cap on block size (4MB but ~2.5ish MB), a block mined at a difficulty of 50T is way more energy dense than a block mined at 100 given an identical size in MB. It’s a unitless proxy.
As far as temperature here is my definition. Relating this to Boltzmanns constant, which has a dimensionality of joules per kelvin; we notice that the temperature in bitcoin has no dimensionality, yet measured in satoshis. Look at Genesis, what do you see?
Are you certain what you see in Space or what we may call memory is not a crystallized past of transactions? How else could we gather anything about the “Big Bang”otherwise? Oh yeah, Bitcoin and temperature breaks the Big Bang theory….
#Bitcoin #Bigbang #Physics
GM, I’m Deep in the trenches right now trying to finish the thermodynamic theory to calculate the energy of each Bitcoin block solely from on-chain data alone. I can produce Joules but how do I know if I am correct?
Block Temperature, Entropy and Boltzmann.
I’m definitely going to need help sharpening the equations down.
Every Bitcoin miner has an incentive to help me develop this; we know nothing about Bitcoin still. This would will completely change the mining industry and energy markets. Everything the network is doing is fiat based and not joules based.
#Bitcoin #Energy #Physics #Mining