yeah, really no problem with being dependent on google decision and the fact that a change in codebase can end grapheneos at all in one day?... Linux desktop is a gran-bazaar of projects that protect the users from this dangers, a better IMO example of good FOSS projects

But comunicate across different multisigs is less efficient than communicate on the L1 network, so is:

- few centralized L2s, not too much net-effect lost, less fees and less data on L1 ---> centralized scaling solution.

- a lot of decentralized L2s, net-effect lost, need to back to L1 to regain net-effect ----> decentralized, but not a scaling solution.

even the most basic things like "government is the enemy of free individuals" or "euro is designed to makes you poor and devaluing your resources" makes me appear like a schizo with people IRL

so true

yes, a good ux doesnt change that if the amount grows, the risk became too high and we need self custody.

We need better custodial ux AND better non-custodial ux.

wow it is coming the squeeze time, these fiat scam-specialists will sell virtual bitcoin over complex layers ponzis based on, at some point, print a gigantic amount of money to fill the holes. But this time they cant print bitcoin and will experience an hard money not designed to work smooth in their systems, so they will try to buy more bitcoin like crazy with the fresh fiat.

No one is bullish enough.

I add that obviously there are different cases, some gurus are so trash and most courses are scams for rich people, but I'm sure some of them could be useful. My critics is general about the industry that proliferated and my personal experience about it, in theory there's nothing more sane than pay some virtuous and good human to teach and explain you some new perspective about life.

yeah I agree, I think I'm a bit dependent on coffe but it is so really difficult to abandon something that you love and that ALSO seems to, at least, dont be negative for healt.

I'll go totally decaf to see if the eye pain is really related to it, and then decide what to do.. maybe in future will restart a more sane relationship with coffe

so cool, we need a pirated version of the platform

I frankly know only two people from different social and age extraction that do this, and they are just a bit above average in terms of success... in the end to think to spend money on something like that you need to have money to spend, so need to be at least a bit succesful, for merits or luck.

I think the causality is the reverse of what someone would think: they are a bit succesful, want to be more succesful and are not so indipendent and not so smart; so they ended pay someone to talk banalities that for them probably arent banalities.

I would be curious to observe in the long term if they still will have success and how the courses will incide. My bet is that if they will continue take decisions with the same algorithm they used to decide to buy the courses, they probably will not continue to be so succesfull in the long run...

I think as protocol the incentives are set to scale and become widespread, as network it will encounter these problems, I would expect a different topology from what we have today. The good think is that the incentives are set as leeching is difficult and avoidable and this help scale in a healty, and maybe slow way.

Today a great part of the network dont pay relays, as userbase will grow, free relays will probably vanish (and userbase will have problem to grow at this point, I agree with you).

I think the great nostr design make it scale in a anarchic way: who want his data and his presence to be more widespread will pay or selfhost for his relays, other people will be less reacheble and have worse free-tier experience.

The precedent tries to create decentralized social media, the was intended to scale in a socialist way: some need to run the servers and put a smisurated effort and resources that benefit all the network, and all the others take the benefits without give nothing. This, or the more scalable solution to run the server and gain from exploiting users.

I drink 3-4 espresso, without sugar or anything else added.

It wouldnt be too much, and I dont consume energy drink or other caffeinated drinks.

Frankly from some years the coffee I consume daytoday is pretty strong, and is like a double expresso; sometimes I'm far from home and consume espresso from random places, and even with 3-4 espresso I feel like I'm decaffeinated...

Most important, buy self-help curses is the most bearish signal of success-expectation for people.

Very hard to become successfull without doing the hard work of send a go-fuck-yourself to people who want to tell you what to do, course sellers in particular.

just some last shitposting and I'm ready for the great shutdown🙏

notes for my future self: I'm sure that coffee (caffeine most probably) gives me a strange pain to the left eye fom a year. I wasnt totally sure, but now I'm sure of the correlation (not sure about the causation...).

I need to stop coffe. I love coffe, but stop. Now.

After 2-3 months from now there will be a new evaluation of the strange pain to see if its gone away or not.

If my future self will drink coffee in the future months then he is gay.

yeah. Sometimes could be difficult, but doing things "the fiat way" is a lot more difficult if you value your time, your liberty and your dignity as human. The fact a lot of people apply themself costant pains and dont know alternative to being cuckholds doesnt mean it is simple. For example, your life would be simpler without loosing a lot of time in finance compliance and a lot of resources in taxes.

Going to the point, excaping fiat is not a difficult sign of virtue; it is a path to an easier and happier life. Understanding this, I expect everyone would choice non fiat alternative when possible.

Fiat-better-ux is a false meme, fiat ux is terrible and everyone hates it.

I dont blame them, a democratic state like germany is governed by a couple of parasites mafia-like groups that maybe are more confortable in stealing and recycling public funds in fiat and not in bitcoin, where they would then fear forever to be catched on the public ledger.

I agree with you, still the fear and greed index is a bullshit index 😅

on nostr npub is the name... or if a better solution will come, it needs also to serve the basic need of having an univoque name-system-identity for all cases, not specific to enstablish https connections...

Today the way we can be sure the nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcmq0q5s we searched is the real one is verifiyng web of trust (who from our trusted follows then follows her..) so we can apply something similar in ux. The hash table entry would intend only the npub as the name.