Atomic swap requires more movement onchain than a single tx, and so more fees, and most coordinators take theirs fees for maintaining up the service.
CAN rewatch, not WILL rewatch
swapping cross chain is so costly or custodial (and still costly).
Also on xmr you need to count the btc fees because if you stay with your resources on xmr you will pay your shitcoinism trending to zero.
I think the difference is that softwares are developed and tested against the windows translation layer. Then open source community try to recreate this layer on linux in a open source way. In the long run it probably will become better and more powerful than the windows one, but it needs time and more problem are expected in the first iterations.
I agree with you, but I dont think lack of development on one front can be justified by some work happening on the other front.
I think all the scalability model of linux desktop is broken, you cant have a stable, clean and secure desktop environment by hiding to user the processes under the hood and adding layers over layers of complexity and GUIs.
I hack frequently with wayland and X and I think they either can be just so simple and so good, all the problems I find are in the unnecessary garbage on upper layers.
kde and gnome are overcomplex softwares that cant be not-bugged, try a simple minimal wlroots based compositor like dwl
use monero has actually more fees because if you want hold bitcoin that is the only scarce digital asset that have sense to exist and to hold you need to:
1) swap bitcoin to monero
2) use monero (low fees)
3) swap monero to bitcoin when you exceed the amount you are willing to loose in a monero wallet
This pattern is like what you do when you use ligthning but the fees are lower because swapping cross chain is more costly and problematic than open a channel.
Also with lightning you have real bitcoin (even if in a "more risky situation" compared to onchain) and so you dont suffer price depreciation of the shitcoin.
I didnt claimed my brick
they are socialists, they hate it, stallman was upset by how credit cards was spying on it with non-free software but couldnt accept to use crypto (was a talk aboit monero tbh) because "then rich people will not pay taxes".
hey I have a good way to demonstrate you are the real elon you can zap me some millions...
I see the problem is another, it still dont works😅
its because it needs to be a zap superior to 10 sats or it will fail.
bitcoin is digital freedom, fiat system is digital prison. Kyc is enforced in the digital prison and, in particular, in its exit/entry.
Kyc has nothing to do with bitcoin, and agree that kyc bitcoin wallet is an oxymoron.
Even if you want to trade physical fiat cash to digital fiat you will experience pretty the same kyc problem in my region. Kyc ends with the end of fiat.
fully agree, but apps like strike could be useful to during the transition to a full bitcoin standard.
Not in replace of a real bitcoin wallet, but in replace of a legacy banking app.
At least it permit to swap convenintly some fiat to sats and to zap around, thats a value if you are still obligated to manage a fiat money-identity.
