*I keep my promise to receive their bitcoin on their exchange

For this kind of use I would go with vfat, less problem, better kernel support across not-common distros. Limitations are not present if limits are not pushed...

but java at least has a widely deployed and well optimized runtime across all platforms. I hate java clearly, still is the less bad thing from the bad ways of conceptualize a program, its really the best tool for the job for most projects (that IMO shouldnt exist at all in a perfect world, but still).

literally Andrea Pirlo drinking wine is what we are here for

I think zeus message was simply an invite to peace, not a geopolitical critical essay.

I'm so fucking not not bullshit

nostr:nevent1qqsf8ltxsg2nyqdlpr02n3yug2kv4lqns8x30g35530ww742apdmgfqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsp3yzapfwkyw4cr2vt4xx9s27474lj2pkxhqyfqh79n826pv3fkzqrqsqqqqqpmjd4rs

test of time is important, absorb completely gold is something will require some decades at least. In the meantime, there are also all the fiat ponzis to absorb monetary-premium from.

Hi :)

because when I talk to people I mainly want to express myself, stimulate discussions, learn something from others and achieve empathy connections.

"How I feel" is a simple imperfect euristic that makes me understand if these goals (or some of them at least, depend on the nature of the discussion) are reached someway.

This note is underrated

nostr:nevent1qqsz8hfv9e4ezzy9yhg2amhwqg8ztj8y7jc3hj6jgmvgawgtcfwtwacpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyz55xnhpvhksrv5xhm8uyac779c96dfh6pgm8peg3zvvcqx4ezzmuqcyqqqqqqgw5kql0

Do more Bitcoin payments, sign more Bitcoin transactions BUT broadcast less Bitcoin transactions and sign less bombs.

quality over quantity, I feel so good expressing myself and my toughts with close friends, bunch of people around me and I feel satisfied and an happy human.

I'm open and happy to share moments with new people, even in digital realm like I'm doing now, but IDGAF about majority appreciation.

Everytime I do speech I can choose to maximize low-attention high-numbers appreciation or to maximize the correctness and truth of what I feel and think. And everytime I choose the latter I feel good, and in the long run I also receive much much unexpected benefits.

theres no place like $HOME/.local/share 🙏

🏛️💜

I also found that by bolt11 implementation theres also correlation of channel id (and short channel id) and the funding tx.

And by bolt11, the short channel id is added to the invoice. So, as I understood, even with unannoinced channels in wallet like phoenix, the utxo is leaked by default with bolt11 invoices (not with bolt12 reusable invoice).

Zeus embedded lnd for example has an option to wrap invoices and permit to receive payments with bolt11 invoices that dont leaks channel-ids and node-id to the payer.

Also zeus is adding blinding paths, the same trick used in bolt12 to make bolt11 invoices private.

nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz8thwden5te0dehhxarj94c82c3wwajkcmr0wfjx2u3wdejhgjaa6xr have I understood how things works or I'm missing something here? Its really possible to find the funding tx when exposing the channel-id in unannounced channels?

I tried to do the same research and I'm at your same conclusion. The act of correlate node-id, channel-ids and UTXOs is something neccassary for annaounced channel to avoid antispam. So only channels that prove to be correlated to a real utxo can "sign themself" to the register graph of routing channels.

This seems not the case for anannounched channels, so there seems to be no correlation node-id / utxo for them.

There is still a loss of privacy in giving away node-id (like in the actual implementation bolt11 invoice) cause it risks to make correlations across different payments on lightning network that we will receive, and open to net-analisys.

Bolt12 with blinded paths should solve this problem.

I still could have understood something wrong, so a second confirmation would be appreciated😅

#asknostr #bitcoin

what someone can determine by obtaining a node-id of a lighting node with only unannounced channels?

Imagine, for example, someone know a node-id of a phoenix wallet: can he know what are the channels with acinq and what are the UTXO involved onchain?

agree with your vision, but the risk (and opportunity) is associated with every act of expression, in particular when divergent from the status quo. From just a game theory perspective, it doesnt have sense to prosecute a majority, and even if in future the world around would change spin, its still so ineffective prosecute a previous-majority.

So express something associated to an identity is an investment with risks and opportunities, the more divergent it is from majority, the more are risks and opportunities.

The act of not-speech and not populate an identity with acts of public expressions is the safest near 0 risks but also 0 opportunity.

Sometimes decide to not-speech is itself so eloquent and is itself an act of expression, but in reality in a pragmatic way, its nearly impossible to really prosecute/reward silence IMO.

small reigns governed by kings better then globalist democracy

the only quality indicator of a government is the size. The smaller the better, myself is the best government for me.

cygars and dark choco are the only things someone who really likes coffee can accept to mix with