I think theres a misunderstanding, their service permit to buy sats with fiat directly in your phoenix wallet (or other lightning announced/anannounced channels, I tried also with zeus) without kyc (kyclite cause the fiat payment method).
My doubt is that the invoice that they use could request the non-aliased nodeid to phoenix and that theres a way for pocket to obtain infos aboit the UTXO behind the channel.
GCC around 1 and half hour on old core 2 duo, clang/llvm takes much much more, I dont know exactly why. Agree, its mostly a waste of time and resources doing it everytime, I'm still to lazy to move my setup and cant find a distro/os that satisfies me after experienced all that freedom
nostr:nprofile1qqspx0xjl6wu83x3vm6d3yjwu5vx5v8fna4wwnxscfzcm5q6esfdkhcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuumhd9ehxtt9de5kwmtp9e3ksqglwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx26tww4hxg7nhv9h856t89eehqctrv5wy4wne I have a privacy question regarding the lightning topup feature.
When a topup is redeemed from phoenix are you able to discover whats the nodeid of the user and to obtain informations about the UTXO that funded the channel???
nostr:nprofile1qqspx0xjl6wu83x3vm6d3yjwu5vx5v8fna4wwnxscfzcm5q6esfdkhcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuumhd9ehxtt9de5kwmtp9e3ksqglwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx26tww4hxg7nhv9h856t89eehqctrv5wy4wne I have a privacy question regarding the lightning topup feature.
When a topup is redeemed from phoenix are you able to discover whats the nodeid of the user and to obtain informations about the UTXO that funded the channel???
nostr:nprofile1qqsgve8lxcl0e5m2z480mj7x9xjdrex9z8u3znsaxh088llnrjmc8vcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtc77vh7k ciao Massimo, se non sbaglio nostr:nprofile1qqsxgl2fhjh00ulmpvcljfd77hl8tkgnahswhqhd9w2ukze8fy0ucfgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7p7hzyg utilizza pocket per diversi servizi... Sai per caso qual è la risposta? Grazie mille!
sorry but the only advantage of running gentoo is popping up in these kind of discussion and tell people to compile their own compilers or they are not real men
nostr:nprofile1qqspx0xjl6wu83x3vm6d3yjwu5vx5v8fna4wwnxscfzcm5q6esfdkhcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuumhd9ehxtt9de5kwmtp9e3ksqglwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx26tww4hxg7nhv9h856t89eehqctrv5wy4wne I have a privacy question regarding the lightning topup feature.
When a topup is redeemed from phoenix are you able to discover whats the nodeid of the user and to obtain informations about the UTXO that funded the channel???
nostr:nprofile1qqs0nt9skq6vfsgh06v979rrnuchau87mmnk2lqxpv2xaeusqfp30mqpzamhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctc9ad278 you seems really expert in that things, do you know the answer? I dont know how to consider this service, cause if they are able to see onchain is not so good. Maybe some sort of node-alias is involved?
nostr:nprofile1qqspx0xjl6wu83x3vm6d3yjwu5vx5v8fna4wwnxscfzcm5q6esfdkhcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuumhd9ehxtt9de5kwmtp9e3ksqglwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx26tww4hxg7nhv9h856t89eehqctrv5wy4wne I have a privacy question regarding the lightning topup feature.
When a topup is redeemed from phoenix are you able to discover whats the nodeid of the user and to obtain informations about the UTXO that funded the channel???
and the replybot is not even in his final form
finally decent tux karts races
every medical intervention has a variety of unexpected conseguences, most of them bad, some of them neutral, pretty noone good.
So I'd consider to intervent medically on my body if I'm able to identify a clear bad expected conseguence in the not-intervention and a clear good expected conseguence in the intervention.
In this way, whatever would be the unexpected conseguences of intervention, there's a lot of chances they wouldnt be worse than the expected conseguences of not-intervention.
This also prescribe a simple euristic to act in every condition of information: if you cant strogly identify expected benefit/malus dont act.
The opposite of modern world psychosis of taking pills for all little diseases (and even when there no disease but strong social/media pressure).
it stands for "clitoris" it seems to be common found in developers community
noooo we are winning, the fiat system has remained with low hp we cant stop playing now, its so funny😤
as always samsung was pioneer in that feature with the note 7, apple will implement it when its really ready for consumer market
I think everything based on certificate authority is fiat and should be abolished.
Better landlock hardware on software with my sign (or a sign I decide to trust). The whitelist in uefi db is pretty much the list of orgs that I wouldnt trust to make my hardware not porposefully explode.
I'm pretty sure even the red hat spooks are whitelisted in secureboot
secure boot is a uefi feature, not present in legacy bios; it is really limited and is just a whitelabel-based signature check on firmware and other software that are loaded at boot.
They are mostly useful to lock-in users and prevent utilizing their hardware with "not-approved software"; the security aspect is mostly a joke.
If your machine is recent and the hardware is still supported by vendor you may consider keep secure boot on, to have some security on what software is loaded in your machine.
If your hardware is old enough, maybe you want to disable it and replace all the software your machine runs with the update community maintained updated versions, installing linux, foss bootloader, even foss bios with coreboot if its supported.
onion routing need to be reimplemented with ecash based incentives

