Nostr boggles my mind every morning that I open a client. The fact that this is all happening because of completely organic social cooperation without an any kind of authority is profound 🤙🫂

pv 🤙

#coffeechain
Or maybe
❤️/🤙 = A person that zapped
⚡= Total received through zaps
Both could be shown. Maybe both are valuable impression stats
This is a tricky one for sure. Can see both sides of the argument.
For polls, if I'm the pollster, I'd much prefer being able to set a "vote minimum" and "vote maximum" where any vote less doesn't count, and voting over the max still results in 1 vote. The range could be chosen by the pollster allowing it to be tailored to the situation (seriousness, likelyhood of being brigaded, topic, etc)
But for a typical post, I think it really depends on how we want to view that stat. Is it an improved "like" showing you got my attention, or is it a tip jar showing how much I valued the content? I kinda feel like it should be seen as a tip jar. Healthier incentives
Looks like your zap receipts aren't working?
Verifying my Nostr Nests identity: txMO0ju16-iONzhRhBBtQosUq2UDwVmWnIcWwmO70d8
Live view of the miners being DoS attacked

👀

Would take him out for a nice seafood dinner and NEVER CALL HIM AGAIN.
First nip proposal (WIP): https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/486
Very prepared for there to be a simple reason this is a bad idea 😁
nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 nostr:npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj nostr:npub1qqqqqqyz0la2jjl752yv8h7wgs3v098mh9nztd4nr6gynaef6uqqt0n47m nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s
Mind boggling... It's wild how dumb a crowd of people can be
Has anyone worked on TTLs for auto revokation of #nip26 delegated key pairs? Imagine this could get pretty complicated, but it seems problematic to rely on the visibility of a revokation event for clients to know when a delegated key should no longer be trusted
PKI would be pretty broken if we could only rely on CRLs/OCSPs and TTLs didn't exist 🤔
I think it was that last .9 of a step that really got him there
Would this bill consider each relay "a social media platform"? Each client?
(6) SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM.—The term ‘‘social media platform’’ means an online application or website that—
(A) offers services to users in the United States;
(B) allows users to create accounts to publish or distribute to the public or to other users text, images, videos, or other forms of media content; and
(C) provides the functions described in paragraph (B) other than in support of—
(i) facilitating commercial transactions;
(ii) facilitating teleconferencing and videoconferencing features that are limited to certain participants in the teleconference or videoconference and are not posted publicly or for broad distribution to other users;
(iii) facilitating subscription-based content or newsletters;
(iv) facilitating crowd-sourced content for reference guides such as encyclopedias and dictionaries;
(v) providing cloud-based electronic storage, including cloud-based storage that allows collaborative editing by invited users;
(vi) making video games available for play by users;
(vii) reporting or disseminating news;
(viii) providing other kinds of information concerning businesses, products, or travel information, including user reviews or rankings of such businesses, products, or other travel information;
(ix) providing educational information or instruction on behalf of or in support of an elementary school or secondary school, as such terms are defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801);
(x) facilitating electronic mail or direct messaging between users (except for message boards or applications where users can add themselves to messaging groups consisting of large numbers of users) consisting of text, photos, or videos that are not posted publicly and are visible only to the senders and recipients; or
(xi) any other function that provides content to end users but does not allow the dissemination of user-generated content.
https://www.schatz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/protecting_kids_on_social_media_act_2023.pdf


