41
nobody
410c27567a0c52098ef2546b3cd635b7dacd0e4a5dde792095f75bd6f1d33d20
account deleted

The NSA is embedded in everything we buy, a thing commonly know around real computer geeks is all the spyware in every module we created, every raspberry pi is monitored by the NSA and NSA uses about 80% of tor network for something. We dont have privacy lol even if we buy stuff with cash they come out with new bills and take old bills out of circulation. There are components you could buy and build a pc yourself but they start around 5k a piece rn to make which an average person wont fork up just to be “anonymous” so it’s definitely an interesting mindset we have online, i know for a fact they monitor all roads in america, and theres about 4 IPV 6 drones constantly in surveillance of every state. They know who buys bitcoin which tech goes where so even “sovereignty” is nice its much an illusion. If they want you best believe they gonna find you.

Replying to ringo

that was interesting and here is my main thought about it:

the thing is, as best as i currently understand, bitcoin only goes up for two reasons:

people buy more of it, or, there's an increased demand for it.

but my main problems with this, are as follows

- cbdc is emminent, and when that occurs it will change a lot. stay with me a sec.

- when people globally "hypothetically" want to use bitcoin, but cant get any, how does that help any of them? are we hypothesizing that the entire world, is just going to use whatever liuidity is in the lightning network. and adjust the price of everything, based on an ever changing metric of how many scraps are in the digital bucket?

-are we to assume that bitcoin will only be valuable because if the holders of it are the only ones who can get it, in a post cbdc economy, this somehow makes the people holding it more useful, or more valuable somehow?

-on the last point, i would argue that it doesn't make those people more useful, primarily because human nature is such that people are greedy, and only self serving, MOSTLY and by most i mean about 90% of the global population. so you have people who cannot afford to buy food, because they are having cbdc, and their money got turned off, expired, or they went outside of their 15 minute city, or they lost too many social credit points , or what have you. and they need bitcoin to buy food and pay rent? how is this fair or even possibly imaginable, in anyones wildest dreams? it simply wouldn't take. they'd be rioting in the streets, for bitcoin to increase the market cap, so they could have a chance at having some money. even with all the halving, which just eventually brings it mathematically close to error divide by zero, there still wouldn't be enough to satisfy global liquidity needs, based on how people currently live.

where i'm going with this, is while bitcoin is a nice idea, and has a lot of cool things about it, i dont think in my wildest dreams as its presently configured, that it would *ever* satisfy the requirements for a global currency.

not today, not tomorrow, not next year. simply put, never.

and i do realize most of the things i mentioned above are largely left -out- of all the popular hype and books and stuff, unless i've missed these details.

thoughts welcome.

Alot of people i talk to say this “its a ponzi scheme that disguises itself with technology like everything else since the internet became big.” Younger ones dont want to get in because they say too much people are already in it and make money off others getting in too easy, they’d rather start a business and compete with regular people who arent good at business, they look at what their competitors are and say they can do better” most people i know under 25 make more money off social media and reselling things than they do a 9-5.

Replying to ringo

that was interesting and here is my main thought about it:

the thing is, as best as i currently understand, bitcoin only goes up for two reasons:

people buy more of it, or, there's an increased demand for it.

but my main problems with this, are as follows

- cbdc is emminent, and when that occurs it will change a lot. stay with me a sec.

- when people globally "hypothetically" want to use bitcoin, but cant get any, how does that help any of them? are we hypothesizing that the entire world, is just going to use whatever liuidity is in the lightning network. and adjust the price of everything, based on an ever changing metric of how many scraps are in the digital bucket?

-are we to assume that bitcoin will only be valuable because if the holders of it are the only ones who can get it, in a post cbdc economy, this somehow makes the people holding it more useful, or more valuable somehow?

-on the last point, i would argue that it doesn't make those people more useful, primarily because human nature is such that people are greedy, and only self serving, MOSTLY and by most i mean about 90% of the global population. so you have people who cannot afford to buy food, because they are having cbdc, and their money got turned off, expired, or they went outside of their 15 minute city, or they lost too many social credit points , or what have you. and they need bitcoin to buy food and pay rent? how is this fair or even possibly imaginable, in anyones wildest dreams? it simply wouldn't take. they'd be rioting in the streets, for bitcoin to increase the market cap, so they could have a chance at having some money. even with all the halving, which just eventually brings it mathematically close to error divide by zero, there still wouldn't be enough to satisfy global liquidity needs, based on how people currently live.

where i'm going with this, is while bitcoin is a nice idea, and has a lot of cool things about it, i dont think in my wildest dreams as its presently configured, that it would *ever* satisfy the requirements for a global currency.

not today, not tomorrow, not next year. simply put, never.

and i do realize most of the things i mentioned above are largely left -out- of all the popular hype and books and stuff, unless i've missed these details.

thoughts welcome.

I so thing as the generations go on they might create something newer and better, we are only seeing cryptocurrency in phase 2 format

It looks amazing in the video love to see what products you produce with it.

Sometimes nice to turn off all the lights, turn on all the rgb, sync it, play my edm playlist at the loudest my speakers can go and dance. I spend 99% of my time alone but my world is my world.

So a side project i’m also doing is creating 3D printed goods with hemp filament. Bought a patent for a by product processing technique that can turn into a filament and leave the processed hemp to use for anything. Goal is to provide cheap renewable things for factions of the costs at corporations. Might not go global but we going to help some people save a-lot of money.

Ive mainly been using cordyceps tea to help with mental fatigue and using blue light glasses to help keep the eye strain down. So far so good just taking time away when i play call of duty for some fun. Appreciate the convo tonight!

Can’t handle the heat then stay out of the kitchen. I like the heat.

Thats why i wanted to kind of run a compare and contrast of everything and figure out the differences. The brc fork i did is interesting as well. Fuck the algorithms man im already at a headache from all the math. Just want to see the $$$ these guys are all making on the backend and what they do with it. I kind of like forensics lol after a while ill look at layers 2 on btc and dive in there im very interested in RSK and Mintlayer when it comes out on the 28th

Precisely why tests nets are important apparently to find the bug issues of the contract, noticed a lot d apps on eth dont have their own test nets so you have to fork eth and run against it in a private environment.

The this leads me down the rabbit hole of polkadot, avax, and cosmos. What does a layer 0 mean compared to the others and what security risks are involved there with interoperability. I wont lie whats lead me down this is the UST collapse and Anchor protocol. Just kind of weird has all these coins and chains dont have value and can implode or shut down like bnb smart chain in october.

Well ive been coding my own blockchain, and from time to time like to poke around on the inside, the most curious thing to me is why BNB smartchain had so much success with a hostile fork. Thats why ive been forking here and there playing around. Trying to see why they did, what features they changed, and just to kind of clarify it. ETHW is an interesting fork. As to BTC i want to see the why bitcoin cash did what it did and why it even makes sense to do this. What type of security and control benefits and how well it plays out.

Forked ETH cause i was bored, maybe play around a little bit with some d apps I coded and so on.