42
kripcat.eth
4258c76e0d064ddeede523a66926915c8c1aaa54f2db790153e4b3c7292a91e1
Crypto pluralist.

Interesting take. Obviously for Bitcoin as a hard money maximum decentralisation is very important.

But for social media is maximum decentralisation that important? What people want (or perhaps what people should want) is to have sovereignty over their data and in doing so eliminate bad incentivises for companies to keep people using the platform by whatever means necessary; even if it fractures our collective agreement on what is real and what is not.

Farcaster claims to be “sufficiently decentralised” (I haven’t used Farcaster btw). Mastadon is less decentralised than Nostr through it’s instances, but much more than Twitter or Threads Couldn’t that level of decentralisation be enough to achieve the goal?