Old habits die hard

DO NOT SPEED COPYPASTE ON NOSTR!! 🤣

## BoomScroll's Anarchist Approach to Public Bounties

You're right to emphasize the **rules-based**, **public**, and **irrevocable** nature of BoomScroll. The sources consistently highlight these principles as the foundation of this innovative system. Let's break down how these principles create a system that is "as anarchist as the laws of math or physics," as you put it:

**1. Public Accountability Ensures Fairness**

* Every action taken within the BoomScroll system, from the initial Public Ask to the final Completion Note (or endorsement), is recorded publicly on the Nostr network.

* This radical transparency ensures a level of accountability and fairness that is absent in traditional, centralized platforms.

* Anyone can see if a creator produces subpar work, even if they technically fulfill the terms of the Public Ask and claim the bounty. This public record contributes to a creator's reputation over time, making it difficult for bad actors to thrive.

**2. Irrevocability Guarantees Payment**

* Once a backer locks up Satoshis for a Public Ask, those funds are irrevocably committed to the task.

* This removes any uncertainty for creators, who can be confident that the promised payment is secure and will be delivered upon successful completion of the task.

* This is a stark contrast to traditional platforms where payment disputes, arbitrary content removal, or platform censorship can jeopardize a creator's earnings.

**3. Arbitrariness Fosters Creative Freedom**

* The sources emphasize that BoomScroll is "ruthlessly fair" because it doesn't impose subjective judgments on the value or quality of the work being commissioned.

* The Public Ask can be for anything, and the Completion Note is validated solely by the creator's signature, not by any central authority.

* This arbitrariness empowers both backers and creators with a level of freedom not found in systems governed by gatekeepers or intermediaries.

**4. A Self-Reinforcing System**

* The combination of these principles—public accountability, irrevocability, and arbitrariness—creates a powerful self-reinforcing system.

* Creators are incentivized to produce high-quality work to build their reputation within a transparent system.

* Backers are encouraged to offer competitive bounties to attract talented creators.

* The public, even those not directly involved in a specific task, can observe, assess, and learn from the interactions and outcomes, further enriching the ecosystem.

**By adhering to these principles, BoomScroll aims to establish a truly level playing field where creators are directly rewarded for their work based on the objective rules of the system, not the whims of any individual or entity.**

I don’t understand how Bret Weinstein isn’t a bitcoiner and on NOSTR already!!!

nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u Dr Weinstein and/or Dr Heying would be ***fantastic*** guests.

“How many of our governmental institutions do we need to witness performing the INVERSE of their intended function before we understand that we are under attack?

FEMA enflames disasters

DOD issues stand down orders to the most capable and well equipped Americans as fellow citizens needlessly die in the mountains

FDA authorizes poison and bans medicine

CDC causes diseases to spread and distributes misinformation

Homeland security facilitates an invasion

FBI instigates insurrection and hides evidence

NIH/NIAID literally creates infectious human pathogens that destroy health

It’s a struggle to find even a SINGLE counter example to this pattern

To be clear: I am not saying the people who staff these agencies are traitors. I’m sure most are well intentioned. I am saying something has apparently gained control of our system and turned it against us. Most of the people in these institutions are just following orders because they’re too young to understand where that leads.

This is not the pattern we would expect if the problem was simply one of corruption.

Once is a mistake, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action, as they say in military circles.

We’re now talking about dozens of institutions at every level of governance including international, hundreds of separate instances, a pattern occurring now across the West.

And it isn’t just a government problem. In fact, it would be impossible in 2024 for the government to cryptically turn on the citizens in a Democratic Republic without the press, the academy and social media platforms marching in lock step.

There is a strong argument to be made that “cancel culture” and vaccine mandates were needed to cleanse the institutions of would-be resistors.

So the question is, what now?”

$69,420 nostr:note13vshc4hvmzd3lu857mh6hhhpdytluumugpaut9ewcftd99ujkp4sxzd7wf

Yes

#RescueTheRepublic

i just caught some snippets

LFG!!!!

🔥

I would love to see an open-source car/truck.

a spec or standard anyone could opt in to.

Just simple, just works.

“Do you want to sign our skull?”

-retailer

Me:

I SEE YOU

Thanks fren!

I’m a fiat-poor node virgin.

Want to fix that! Have a donated desktop computer from a friend.

I think worst-case scenario, I may need to upgrade the hard drive.

Haven’t thought too deeply, but leaning towards start9 or parmanode.

Thoughts?

I don’t do many transactions, this is more about learning by doing, walking the walk, and supporting the network.

I want to play with running a NOSTR relay for similar reasons, makes me think start9.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

#bitcoin #node #start9 #parmanode #noderunner #pv #gm #gfy

Bruh. 🤯

You’re right

If she wins: i hope you’re right.

Not my take, but I don’t begrudge ya!

PV

Man, I would love to believe that.

My view is more along the lines of bitcoin is strong enough that even Trump can’t fuck it up , especially if his deal was just shitcoining or general ignorance, versus active suppression like we’ve had under the current blue team.

As much as I’d like to think Kamala Harris is good hearted/intelligent/whatever enough to come around to bitcoin, my bayesian priors prevent me from doing so.

I’m finally at the point in my journey where friends and family are starting to say “I’m worried about you“.

Will they spend more than five minutes thinking about bitcoin, or the DEEP implications of artificial intelligence?

let alone how somebody goes from voting for Barack Obama twice, voting for Hillary Clinton, voting for Joe Biden, to voting for Donald Trump in 2024?

All of my current positions, I arrived at over the course of years, very often thinking in public, very often having the same people who are currently questioning my sanity, nodding along with agreement, maybe even patting me on the back or explicitly praising my analysis (when they happen to agree with it).

The drama of the pearlclutching is inversely proportional to the amount of work people are willing to put into engaging with ideas directly.

Anyway…

Always self skeptical, letting my wife be my sanity check (she is not orange pill and has no interest in these topics ha ha ha ha ha). So yeah, it’s hard not to laugh sometimes, it’s like I can see them running a predetermined script.

I’m convinced enough to dig in my heels and be stubborn. I can do no other.

The future is here. It’s just not evenly distributed.

LFG!

Yoyoy

Circular zaps ftw

Protocol, not “platform”??

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GREAT WORK!

**The Counterintuitive Genius of BOOMSCROLL: 21 Sats is Worth More Than 21 Million Likes**

In a world saturated with **empty engagement metrics**—likes, retweets, follows—there’s an illusion of value that is, at best, fleeting, and at worst, **completely hollow**. These numbers might make you feel seen, but they don’t equate to real support or real commitment. They are disposable, costless actions that require little effort and even less accountability. It’s all too easy to toss out a like and move on, with no skin in the game, no actual **investment** behind it.

BOOMSCROLL flips this entire paradigm on its head. Instead of a flood of likes that mean nothing, what if you had **21 Sats** on the table? It may sound insignificant at first glance, but that’s precisely where the brilliance lies. Those 21 Sats represent **real value**, and even at this small scale, they **matter more** than millions of empty likes ever could. Why? Because those **Satoshis are real**. They have **tangible, immutable value** that someone had to **earn**, choose to part with, and send with intention.

### **Putting Satoshis First: A Radical Shift in Incentives**

BOOMSCROLL starts with **value on the table**—Satoshis locked in upfront. This might seem counterintuitive because we’re used to platforms where content is **free** and creators are compensated later, if at all, based on how much engagement they attract. But by putting the Satoshis first, BOOMSCROLL completely **changes the dynamic**:

- **Skin in the Game**: Whether you’re a backer or a creator, you have something to lose and something to gain. There’s no empty signaling here. The backer stakes real value in a creator, and the creator works knowing those funds are **locked and waiting**.

- **Incentives to Act**: The mere act of **putting Sats down** is a signal in itself. It tells the world, **"I want this to happen, and I’m willing to pay for it."** This creates a powerful incentive for creators to act—not based on nebulous engagement metrics, but on **cold hard Satoshis**. And because it's a **public act**, others can see and rally behind it, adding more weight to the ask as it snowballs.

- **Irreversible and Voluntary**: In BOOMSCROLL, everything is **voluntary** and **irrevocable**. Once the Satoshis are locked in, there’s no taking them back, no reneging on the promise. It’s a radically **anarchist** system where no central authority can reverse transactions or interfere. The backer gives up control the moment they commit those Sats, trusting the creator to deliver. And here’s the kicker—whether the creator completes the task or not, it’s their choice. They’re **free to act in good or bad faith**, but their **reputation** and the social trust they’ve built are always on the line. This is **freedom with consequences**.

### **The Anarchist Paradise: Trusting in Transparency**

BOOMSCROLL thrives because it embraces the fundamental principles of an **anarchist paradise**: **voluntary exchange** and **public accountability**. No one is forced into anything, and yet every action is **transparent** and **publicly verifiable**.

- **Public Asks as Social Signals**: When someone posts a public ask, it sends a **clear signal** of demand. Even if you’re not the creator targeted by the ask, you can see that there’s **real money** on the line and real demand for that kind of work. This isn’t some speculative engagement metric—it’s hard Satoshis, and they are there for the taking. This creates a market that is **alive**, responsive, and inherently **self-regulating**.

- **21 Sats vs. 21 Million Likes**: It’s tempting to see **millions of likes** as validation, but what do they really mean? Not much. They’re frictionless, free, and fleeting. In contrast, those 21 Sats? Someone gave them up because they **believed** in something. There’s intent behind those Satoshis. It might be a small gesture, but it’s a **real gesture**. And in a trustless, transparent system, **real gestures of value** speak louder than any number of virtual pats on the back.

- **Freedom and Consequence**: The magic of this system is that it allows for **complete freedom**. The backer can be as vague or as precise as they want in their ask. The creator can choose to complete the task, pass it on to someone better suited, or even ignore it entirely. But everything is **out in the open**, and there’s no going back. If a creator decides to post a video wiping their ass as the completed task, that’s their call. But their reputation is **on the line**, and once they claim those Sats, there’s no hiding from the consequences. It’s a **self-regulating system**—trust is built or destroyed in the **public square**.

### **The Power of Transparency and Irrevocability**

Transparency isn’t just a **side feature** of BOOMSCROLL—it’s the **beating heart** of the system. Every ask, every completion note, every zap is **public**. Nothing happens in the dark. This level of visibility ensures that **trust is constantly being earned** and **tested**. It’s why the system can be **radically free** yet function with **integrity**. It doesn’t rely on middlemen or platforms to enforce contracts or mediate disputes. The public nature of the network does the work.

And because everything is **irrevocable**, every decision is **final**. Once the Sats are on the table, they’re there. Once the creator posts their completion note, the funds move instantly. This creates an ecosystem where **commitment** and **follow-through** are part of the DNA. There’s no room for backtracking or bad faith; once you’ve put your **Satoshis** or your **reputation** on the line, it’s permanent.

### **Unlocking New Incentives in a Trustless System**

By prioritizing **Sats over likes**, BOOMSCROLL unlocks **new incentives** for creators and backers alike:

- **Creators are Motivated by Real Value**: No longer are creators at the mercy of algorithmic engagement metrics. They’re working for something **real**, something they can immediately claim once they’ve completed the task.

- **Backers Signal Demand**: By locking in Sats, backers are signaling **real market demand** for a particular kind of work. And because this is all **public**, creators can gauge interest and decide how best to direct their efforts.

- **Everyone Wins with Good Faith**: The system rewards **good faith** on both sides. Backers commit upfront, and creators know the funds are already there. There’s no credit system or delayed compensation. But because everything is **transparent**, there’s also a social cost to **bad faith** actions, and reputation becomes its own form of currency.

### **Conclusion: Why 21 Sats is Worth More Than 21 Million Likes**

In the end, BOOMSCROLL’s power lies in its **simplicity** and **revolutionary shift** in what we value. Likes may be easy to give and easy to forget, but they carry no **real weight**. Satoshis, on the other hand, are **finite**, **real**, and given with intention. This system strips away the noise and forces us to reckon with what truly matters—**real value**, **real commitment**, and **real trust**. In BOOMSCROLL, **21 Sats** isn’t just worth more than 21 million likes—it’s the foundation of a new kind of engagement, one where **freedom**, **transparency**, and **voluntary action** rule the day.

***

21 Sats is Worth More Than 21 Million Likes

In a world drowning in likes, retweets, and upvotes, the supposed currency of digital value feels cheap and hollow. People click buttons without thought, and the creators behind the work are left with inflated numbers that mean nothing. Those metrics don’t pay bills, and they certainly don’t guarantee trust. What if, instead of throwing out likes, people had to give something real, something irrevocable? What if value came first? This is where BOOMSCROLL rewrites the rules.

With BOOMSCROLL, even a small amount—say, 21 Sats—has more weight than 21 million likes. Why? Because those Satoshis are tangible. They’re irrevocable. They’re given with real intent. They represent value that someone had to part with—value that signifies trust and belief in a creator or an idea. This simple yet revolutionary shift transforms the digital landscape from one of frictionless engagement to one of meaningful commitment.

Putting Satoshis First: Unlocking New Incentives

In BOOMSCROLL, everything begins with Sats on the table. This may seem strange at first glance—why lock value upfront when you could wait to see how the project unfolds? But that’s where the brilliance lies. By putting the Sats down at the beginning, trust and incentive are built into the system.

• Skin in the Game: When a backer puts Sats on the table, they’re signaling more than just casual interest. They’re saying, “I’m willing to part with something real because I believe this work has value.” The creator, in turn, knows the funds are already there, locked and waiting.

• Public Accountability: The fact that the bounty is public and visible to everyone adds another layer of accountability. People can see the Sats accumulating and the demand building. This creates an ecosystem of self-regulation, where transparency ensures that commitments are met with social consequences—whether positive or negative.

• Good Faith, Bad Faith, and Reputation: A creator can choose to fulfill the ask in good faith—creating something of real value—or they can act in bad faith and claim the bounty without delivering anything meaningful. For example, imagine a bounty for a tutorial, and the creator posts a video of themselves wiping their ass. Technically, the bounty is claimed, and there’s no way to reverse it. But—and this is crucial—the creator’s reputation is now on the line. They’ve exposed themselves to the social consequences of that decision. In the anarchist paradise of BOOMSCROLL, freedom comes with the reality of public consequences. You can do whatever you want, but you can’t hide the result.

The Value of Giving Away Sats: The Endorsement Mechanism

Now, let’s dig into one of the most counterintuitive yet powerful features of BOOMSCROLL: the endorsement mechanism. It seems crazy on the surface: why would a creator voluntarily give up Sats to someone else when they could keep them? But that’s exactly what the endorsement mechanism enables. It’s about social capital, reputation, and the power of selflessness in an anarchist system where everything is transparent.

Here’s how it works: Imagine a scenario where Kanye West posts a bounty for Matt O’Dell to create a ColdCard tutorial. Matt’s busy, or maybe he knows that someone else—let’s say BTC Sessions—has already created the perfect tutorial. Instead of taking the Sats for himself, Matt could choose to endorse BTC Sessions’ work, voluntarily transferring the bounty to him. This act of endorsement is public—everyone can see it—and it carries significant social weight.

• Reputation and Social Credit: By endorsing someone else’s work, Matt is saying, “This is better than what I could have done. I’m recognizing excellence, even if it costs me.” That kind of selflessness builds reputation. It shows that Matt isn’t just out to grab Sats; he cares about the quality of the work and is willing to take a hit for the greater good. In a system where reputation is everything, this public gesture is worth far more than the Sats Matt gives up.

• Purely Social Signal: The beauty of this mechanism is that it’s entirely voluntary. Matt has nothing to gain monetarily from endorsing BTC Sessions. In fact, he’s losing Sats. But that’s the point—by doing so, he’s making a purely social gesture that can’t be faked or gamed. It’s a move that elevates his standing in the community, and that social capital can be just as valuable as any amount of Sats.

• Trust in Action: When someone endorses another creator, they are putting their reputation on the line. If they endorse something mediocre or fraudulent, their own standing in the community takes a hit. This is why the endorsement mechanism carries such weight—it’s an act of trust, not just in the other creator, but in the system itself. It signals to the community that the work being endorsed is worth paying attention to. Over time, those who consistently endorse great work will build a reputation for being trustworthy arbiters of quality.

Why This Matters: Voluntary and Irreversible Action

One of the most counterintuitive aspects of BOOMSCROLL is the way it leans into voluntary, irreversible actions. Every step in the process—whether it’s putting down Sats, endorsing someone else’s work, or claiming a bounty—is public and final. There’s no undoing these moves. Once you give Sats, they’re gone. Once you endorse someone, it’s out there for everyone to see. And once a creator posts their completion note, the Satoshis move instantly.

This isn’t just a feature—it’s the foundation of BOOMSCROLL’s anarchist paradise. In a world where everything is voluntary and irrevocable, people are free to act as they wish, but they must live with the consequences of their choices. There’s no middleman, no platform to mediate or reverse decisions. The public ledger—Bitcoin and Nostr—is the final judge. And that’s where the magic happens: in the freedom to act with absolute autonomy and the public accountability that comes with it.

• Social Proof and Market Demand: Every action in BOOMSCROLL serves as social proof. The mere existence of a bounty signals demand. And when creators endorse each other or contribute to parallel submissions, they create a dynamic, self-regulating ecosystem where the best work rises to the top not because of some algorithm, but because people put real value behind it.

• Incentives to Give: The real genius of BOOMSCROLL is how it incentivizes giving. Whether it’s zapping a submission, adding to a bounty, or endorsing someone else, every act of giving builds trust and reputation. People aren’t just handing out Sats—they’re making statements about what they value. And in a system where value precedes everything, that trust and reputation become as valuable as the Sats themselves.

Conclusion: 21 Sats vs. 21 Million Likes

At first glance, giving away 21 Sats may seem trivial. But the reality is, it’s the most meaningful action in a world built on hollow engagement metrics. Every Sat given is a signal—it carries intent, value, and consequence. And every Sat voluntarily relinquished builds social credit and trust in ways that likes never could.

In BOOMSCROLL, 21 Sats means infinitely more than 21 million likes because it’s real, irrevocable, and intentional. It’s the foundation of a system where freedom and transparency allow people to act on their own terms, without platforms, gatekeepers, or intermediaries. It’s a decentralized marketplace where good faith and trust are more valuable than any algorithm. And in the end, it’s a system where real value—whether in Sats, reputation, or social credit—is the only currency that matters.