Same here. Does she cut hair for others too? 💡

"I love the smell of debasing fiat in the morning" - Honey Badger

Have a great week ⚡⚡🤙

Looking to stack some quality content on my feed! If you're dropping knowledge or just vibing in the #Bitcoin space on Nostr, hit me with a follow & I'll follow you back. Let’s build this decentralized future together, one note at a time.

I just realized if #bitcoin is not decentralized now because a lot of constitutions hold much bitcoin. They can control and manipulate the price.

¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

💡 The smartest people I know are studying #bitcoin relentlessly.

Any of you want to do a fantasy football league?

We would need at least 12 people to make it enjoyable.

If somebody already has a league with an extra spot, lmk.

I would argue against. Since opensource projectshas Bitcoin areubased on consensus, it is as stronger as more people understand decisions and argue to have a strong consensus.

Opinion differences do not inforcema better consensus. I would rather argue that they weaken the consensus. Since it leads to conclusions with ilogical premises or no premises at all.

Strong consensus needs strong premises that are logically true and understood by a majority.

For example there will be a very high consens, that speed is the change of position related to time.

I would appriciate if there were more bitcoiners that actually argue based on facts instead based only on feelings.

Since I would state that any discussion that tries to use objective measures to argue on why a hypothesis is true can help advancing society, where exchanging loose feelings does not lead to constant improvement.

For example: "It is problematic Pavel Durov gets arrested and therefore France is autocratic."

Is a quiet meaningless statement which does not educate.

Where "If Pavel Durov is arrested for encrypting messages and not serve them to authorities would show a tendency to authoritarian governance in France." is a much more powerful statement, since it is agil to disqualify France based on a measurable truth, what the court will base its case on.

Majority of Americans can’t afford an average home no more thanks to central banking.

I found on stacker.news this accurate definition of the eras of the #Bitcoin life so far…

1. Satoshi Era (2009-2010)

2. Silk Road/Wiki-leaks Era (2011-2012)

3. Mt. Gox Era (2013-2014)

4. Blocksize War Era (2015-2016)

5. ICO Bubble/Crash Era (2017)

6. #Reckless/Rings of Fire/Lightning Torch Era (2018-2019)

7. Stimulus/Saylor/NFTs/Yield-farming/Proof-of-Stake/Ponzi Double-Bubble/Crash (2021-2022)

8. Ordinals (Shitcoins on Bitcoin) Era (2023)

9. Post-ETF (Third-party custody is a Scaling Solution) Era (2024-present)

As a class 2022 bitcoiner, I was ‘born’ during era 7, immediately after the Terra/Luna crash and a few months before the FTX collapse.

To what era do you belong?

#meme #memes #memestr #fiat #Nostr

end the fed #bitcoin

I can’t even buy stocks anymore. If I do research and read about stocks nowadays I cringe at the idea of investing anything into it, even if I think it will 10x. If it’s not #bitcoin I don’t want it.

Brazil to block X.

50 thousand reais (8900 USD) in fines per day for whoever uses VPN to bypass block.

Fiatjaf did you pull some strings to boost the #nostr?