Avatar
gojiberra
454bc2771a69e30843d0fccfde6e105ff3edc5c6739983ef61042633e4a9561a
figuring it all out I appreciate your humor, insight, and your post whether or not I agree

I've been interested in living on a boat for some time now, and as I've learned more about it, I think I've found an undeveloped market niche. I don't have the capital or expertise to exploit it, but I might benefit a lot from someone else doing it... So here it is...

Offshore moorings. Its a developed industry for energy projects, but appears to be completely absent for pleasure boaters or fishermen.

When you tally up the cost of living on a boat - even a modest boat - it gets ridiculous pretty fast. You need slip space, which is charged per foot, and electricity and probably showers and internet and fuel and water. Getting food probably means paying for a ride. And the harbors are tightly controlled by government and have pseudo monopolies, operating in an advantaged position of a somewhat captive market.

Well... F that. We could open this up to competition by putting some pilings in open water and floating some segments between them to create a deployable lagoon. Obviously there are technical details which I don't know, but if we can make oil rigs, we can make artificial harbors too.

Something I think about a lot is just how much open space there is at sea. It's hard to wrap my mind around it. On land, we get the impression that humanity is spreading over everything like a fungus, but that's not really true - we're using a small fraction of the land and almost never venture out to the unbuilt-upon land. The oceans are entirely unused. And states seem to fear the ocean - shipping lanes can be patrolled because they're as one dimensional as possible. The vast expanse beyond the narrow lanes is wild. Raw nature. Practically infinite in all directions. If you took everything humans have ever built and put it in the Pacific Ocean and then forgot where you left it, you'd never be able to find it again. Its that big...

We could build a breakaway civilization from deployable artificial harbors.... Offshore moorings. Or just make boat life a lot more affordable. Maybe.

#boats #sea #boatlife #business #earth #civilization #freedom

I have definitely browsed the sailboat listing pages a few times.

I just think I'm too lazy tbh.

But I think the harbors, old cities, and other countries would be the draw...

i have to listen to the 2nd half of the interview. I'm interested in knowing if he understood at the start that $MSTR would become a financial product by having bitcoin on balance sheet. or if he realized that later.

basically how strategic was the strategy, or did he just sort of bumble into it.

IMO (gotta recognize the chance I'm wrong) people in churches want to believe their tradition is the best, so that means the Jews must be the best people. Its pride. And pride is the foundation of idolatry. That's the same motivation for believing everything the bible says is literally true. Its definitely not... Almost any part you look at, there is clearly symbolic meaning. To insist on literalism is like giving yourself a lobotomy. IMO. When Jesus said he'd return with the sword, the sword is symbolic. If it was literally true, he wouldn't need a sword, there's an infinite number of ways an omnipotent god can punish people. So what's the symbol? A sword divides this from that. Its the rational mind. A person who denies the rational is denying the world God made. But the repeated lesson the Jews were supposed to learn was, you need both rationality and humility. The two are not opposed - they are actually codependent. Just like how God is both merciful and just - for most people, mercy and justice are opposites and irreconcilable. But there's a better way of seeing it, which is that they're codependent.

Here's an example : king David orders a census to find out how many men he can round up and send to war. God punishes him by sending an angel to Jerusalem and blow up buildings. Basically God takes the other side in the war. Why? Sending men to die in a war isn't justice or mercy. Justice is leaving the innocent alone, not going to war, seeking nonviolent means to resolve a dispute. Killing people sure isn't merciful. Its also not rational or humble. The whole affair was just a fit of pride. Me me me me me... David was an egotistical asshole. He was a brigand before winning his throne, and then continued to act like a brigand. He has a story arc of character development and he grows into a man with perspective, and wrote the Psalms. So... If you're humble, you can be rational. If you're rational, you can be just. If you're just, you can be merciful. All of these are opposites to the initiate, but one to the experienced person.

So yeah, what I see in the history the Bible presents is the worst people slowly learning not to be so bad. They wrote the stories down, and I think that's a sign of humility, maybe the beginning of a recognition that they did wrong. But that's at odds with an apparent pride, which I see mirrored in Christianity. And look now at what they are doing to Palestinians. Those people haven't gotten to the humility lesson, despite 3k years of learning it. But the Jews that didn't go to Israel are Zionism's biggest critics. Maybe they learned.

I like this very much. David is especially one that I struggled with. I was always on Jonathans side, who basically sidelined himself into death for David's ascendance. David was Such a horrible person in so many ways, but also one of "God's favorite". It made me realize that I can't judge people.

it also gave me hope, if David was so bad and he was still able to apologize and be forgiven, maybe I can run around and cut up a bit more... No I'm kidding.

IMO (gotta recognize the chance I'm wrong) people in churches want to believe their tradition is the best, so that means the Jews must be the best people. Its pride. And pride is the foundation of idolatry. That's the same motivation for believing everything the bible says is literally true. Its definitely not... Almost any part you look at, there is clearly symbolic meaning. To insist on literalism is like giving yourself a lobotomy. IMO. When Jesus said he'd return with the sword, the sword is symbolic. If it was literally true, he wouldn't need a sword, there's an infinite number of ways an omnipotent god can punish people. So what's the symbol? A sword divides this from that. Its the rational mind. A person who denies the rational is denying the world God made. But the repeated lesson the Jews were supposed to learn was, you need both rationality and humility. The two are not opposed - they are actually codependent. Just like how God is both merciful and just - for most people, mercy and justice are opposites and irreconcilable. But there's a better way of seeing it, which is that they're codependent.

Here's an example : king David orders a census to find out how many men he can round up and send to war. God punishes him by sending an angel to Jerusalem and blow up buildings. Basically God takes the other side in the war. Why? Sending men to die in a war isn't justice or mercy. Justice is leaving the innocent alone, not going to war, seeking nonviolent means to resolve a dispute. Killing people sure isn't merciful. Its also not rational or humble. The whole affair was just a fit of pride. Me me me me me... David was an egotistical asshole. He was a brigand before winning his throne, and then continued to act like a brigand. He has a story arc of character development and he grows into a man with perspective, and wrote the Psalms. So... If you're humble, you can be rational. If you're rational, you can be just. If you're just, you can be merciful. All of these are opposites to the initiate, but one to the experienced person.

So yeah, what I see in the history the Bible presents is the worst people slowly learning not to be so bad. They wrote the stories down, and I think that's a sign of humility, maybe the beginning of a recognition that they did wrong. But that's at odds with an apparent pride, which I see mirrored in Christianity. And look now at what they are doing to Palestinians. Those people haven't gotten to the humility lesson, despite 3k years of learning it. But the Jews that didn't go to Israel are Zionism's biggest critics. Maybe they learned.

"what I see in the history the Bible presents is the worst people slowly learning not to be so bad. They wrote the stories down, and I think that's a sign of humility, maybe the beginning of a recognition that they did wrong"

nostr:nevent1qqsyecjsm2mmfx3had7wsnggds2w3450hzq6dyae9snq5vu8vcc7u8qpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9tatnkeg7lu63mdtmqcqayvpzmrzn97vztkcs54ena0eehe92yxcrqsqqqqqpf2gkyy

Hah, no problem. YouTube figured out I like fun rabbit holes.

I call it information psychedelics.

I don't know what he means by the viper vision, but I remembered the only 3 students I tried to teach some piano music to. They were kids from a favela in Rio de Janeiro. I happened to be roommates with a Dutch gal that had a project to teach kids music and crafts in the favela.

I went with her a couple times past the gun toting favela security to help out with teaching the handful of kids that showed up for the day.

There were a handful of 8 year olds or so. I struggled through explaining some concepts of the notation and rhythm with the little keyboard we had.

There was one boy in particular who seemed to get it. the second time he came, he surprised me by explaining everything to his fellow students. He was like a little high priest of music. I had no idea where he downloaded the knowledge from.

The organizer told his mother to sign him up for some music lessons outside the favela. My third and final student ever was a little Mozart.

there's one in genesis a bit like this, but the city was Sodom iirc... the detail of that part of the history is much richer in Jasher, it wasn't just the homo pervert rapists it was kooky laws and judges that seemed to be insane and people treating visitors extremely badly

oh and another one involving where the daughter of one of - iirc, Israel (Jacob) where one dude from this town seduced and deflowered one of his daughters, and they confronted the family and township (it was a prominent figure in the town) and they made a deal where the daughter could marry into the family from this town if everyone in the town got circumcised

of course, a vocal minority refused this, and started up a fight about it and because the majority of the towns men were recovering from their surgery they all were slaughtered and all their stuff was taken

i read through this story in three different versions and the one in Genesis was probably the most pleasant.... but yeah, crazy stuff, i mean, crazy

like Isaac and Jacob and Esau story, in two versions it paints it like Jacob and his mother Rebecca are some kind of conniving bastards or something and it made me wonder about how much Rebecca liked her man... he was in his last days and was charmed by the dapper and brutal redheaded Esau and his venison but fell for a ruse where Jacob just fed him bbq goat and accepted this and did some stupid blessing ritual, and out of all this, Esau goes full jealous psycho and wants to kill his brother over this

the themes repeat over and over again, and it's often hard to tell who is actually the bad guys in the story

That stuff about Samson, this involves a weird jewish sect called the Nazirites, and one of their things is they have to never cut their hair, or God will curse them

in the background of many of the stories is sects and cults and all sorts of weirdness, and to be honest, i'm not fond of much of the Old Testament, there is more to the stories but the catholics seemed to pick out much of the worst versions of everything even though there were often dozens of different versions with more details, different focus, and so on

like, on my first reading of Daniel i couldn't get past the seeming treacherousness of Daniel but on teh other hand, Nebuchanezzar was an outright psycho piece of shit... and the Watchers appear in this one, and i'm reading the bible now in a large part for the parts where angels are in the story, because this is an aspect of them that most christians and jews pay little attention to, and i think they are more important

Yeah,there are some bizarre stories in there. I think they all sound a little similar to Sodom and Gomorrah, but this is another time period with slightly different story line.

At the outset of the book of Judges, I had the voice of my 4 year old niece in my head when she asked me who Noah's wife was.

So I was more aware of roles of men and women. I was surprised how many women protagonists and antagonists there were. It doesn't seem like God favored one or the other really. Both sexes had the ability to be honorable and reap rewards.

In the worse situations, men just get slaughtered and women get married off or raped. I think I would prefer being slaughtered.

I'm know for livestock, the males all get slaughtered after a year of growth, except for a chosen few which become bulls. they are chosen for good genetics and tractability. Not too docile (no lazy bulls, 40 cows!) but not too mean either with the calves or the humans.

I'm sipping coffee thinking if I probably should have been slaughtered a while ago

But this modern hedonistic life goes on.

So, after reading the last few chapters of the Book of Judges, It starts going off the rails after Samson.

By the end of Judges, there is a whackadoodle story of man and his "concubine" visiting a city in the land of the tribe of Benjamin. At night, there are men from the city that knock on the door and call for the man to come outside to presumably have sex with them. The man doesn't go out but sends his "concubine" out.

She ends up dead on the street in the morning, and the husband chops her in pieces and sends her out among the "Tribes of Israel".

The rest of the tribes get together, sack the city and kill much of "Benjamin".

Then when they realize that no one will survive from Benjamin, and no one will allow their daughters to marry into the tribe of Benjamin, they decide to go invade yet another city of men who had skipped out on the killing campaign, and kill those men, and give the women to the remaining men of Benjamin.

I might be summarizing some of this incorrectly. The general thought is: it was bloody. It sounds like a lot of genetic culling. Humans being treated like herds of animals.

I kinda just want to walk away from the whole story and say, these people and this religion have nothing to do with me.

It was the first time that I had second thoughts about trying to be "follower of Jesus" whose story came from this story.

It also gives me second thoughts on the whole genetic heritage thing.

There have been couple times in as I age into my thirties where I have the uncomfortable feeling like I have offended my ancestors.

part of me is like, modern humans are so far removed from these stories of bloodthirsty genetic culling.

part of me thinks, maybe bloodshed, revenge, honor is actually more human than peace and prosperity.

or maybe it's just the stories about bloodshed and honor survive.

either way, it's gory.

Thankfully, Ruth is up next and from the first chapter, I feel like I can hear grasshoppers in farm fields as Ruth picks up some grain that harvesters left behind.

it's a step in the right direction.

a coach from highly-used sports program complained how little money the university gives them for highly-used sports programs because the university is all about making more money with the money instead of replacing broken equipment for all the college, high-schoolers, middle schoolers, etc who use the program.

fear!

long answer:

a dog -- not my dog, but a dog in my current household loves me

public amenities like the library and swimming pool

biking -- not as many bike lanes there and less respect bicyclists/pedestrians

hiking -- public park land is everywhere in US, harder to find in countries like El Salvador

But does the constabulary and the normal people regard you

Yeah, they would have to go through the pain of watching the market cap slowly grow big enough to enable meaningful size transactions. Just like Bitcoin is growing right now.

And they would have to trust that none of the parties would lose faith along the way and dump their tokens.

At any point the winning move for any one of the countries would be to sell BricPay tokens and buy Bitcoin.

It will be

BricPay Inflation rate = weighted average of each country currency inflation + inflation tax for BricPayTM

BricPayTM will be secret society consisting of a couple people from each country. It will start small, but slowly snowball as they have to pay more and more people to keep quiet or have positive opinions about BricPay and slowly increase BricPay Inflation Tax.

I'm just joking. It does seem silly that the biggest tech problem is just a trust issue.