I got a zap, and tried sending one back, did it work ?
Brushed my hair… it’s a chore… I need to cut it.. It’s been almost three years now.
Was going to donate it to kids Cancer wig place, which is why I started growing it two years ago. But I don’t know any good ones in Canada.
Any recommendations?
Tried “NeutronPay” couldn’t get it working.
I think I got “Wallet of Satoshi” working. I’m not very familiar with the lighting network.
Now, if only some random bitcoin billionaire would help me out with my 20k left owing on my student loans… *A guy can dream can’t he*
Actually. If you think about it, its design is kind of a vulnerability.
Let’s say a Fed agency wants to target and take down a relay.
- Create a bunch of child P, crap and push it out to the relay from anonymous accounts, then get a search warrant or complain that the relay is allowing that stuff and arrest the individual running the server for allowing its distribution.
Rince repeat till the whole network is harmed, and people are afraid to run relay’s.
The network degrades, and people start experiencing slowdowns and frustrations.
- In my opinion, relays - especially public relays. Should have the option of a public filter list of known bad actors. If several relays ban an address, flagging it as high spam or child P, it should be given a note on the network.
Then relays can filter based on how many times that address was used nefariously.
So if someone keeps switching relays and getting banned, eventually there’s a threshold hit that lets all public relays simply ban as they can obviously see there’s a problem with that user.
New id, process starts over.
Yes, I understand the need for censorship resistance. But outright illegal activity with no mechanism to mitigate that content can be used as a weapon to harm the network.
No one wants to open this app and be met with a sea of kiddy P. There has to be a mechanism to control that at a higher level than individual blocking.
Maybe a way for individuals accounts to subscribe to a blocklist of bad actors, which is derived with a consensus mechanism amongst their followers.
So, if 80% of followers block this address don’t show its content. Allowing that threshold to be adjusted.
It’s kinda like that right now with the way you see followers stuff and then out one level creating a web of trust of sorts, but I don’t think it’s enough.
Especially the relay vulnerabilities.
Can’t in Canada. No access.
Actually more like 4.17 billion gallons, I miss estimated the depth, that’s a closer estimate…
Fish!
Our “tank” is about 275 billion gallons…
It’s a lake beside our house.
That’s all the fish we need.
Ours are even edible when we get the hankering… (like every 10 years…)
Days just beginning and I’m already exhausted.
Anyone else feel the same?
Haha.
Maybe - generate unique email that you’ve signed and published to a bridge.
Any emails that get sent to that signed bridge, get encrypted with a unique one time key and pushed to the user who signed the bridge relay email.
To allow someone to email you, sign their from address, at the bridge.
Interesting… how do you envision it actually working with the protocol?
Who holds the keys for the non nostr user?
You talking private message DMs?
Interesting concept.
Eh. It’s a protocol. I’m actually only been around for a day here, and the more I play with it. The more I like it.
Problem is. It’s still in its infancy.
As its user base balloons, so does its inability to make protocol changes. As it’ll suffer from the effects of needing to convince a group of cats that a change is needed. Which will balloon exponentially.
Haha. You put me down the rabbit hole…
Here’s a proof of concept project I ran across. Interesting…
https://github.com/heyJonBray/blockpgp/blob/master/README.md
Looking at some projects.
This one looks interesting, still reading about it.
https://techxplore.com/news/2020-02-blockpgp-blockchain-based-pgp-framework.html
Yeah.
Or at least some sort of revocation process.
- Loose Controll of your keys, there needs to be some sort of mechanism that only YOU can use to revoke and rotate them.
Potentially a GPG key signature that signs the keys. Old but confusing for some people.
We usually have our identities tied to email. Yet that also has potential problems.
We have an identity problem that we need to solve. The question is, what makes you, you.
Previous groups have tried to solve this by saying the collective histories of your online histories defines you, Keybase tried to solve this by people posting proofs to their channels. Tying all their social identities into one overall identity. It’s an interesting project, but it’s got a centralization problem too. We may need a similar idea, but built in a decentralized system.
- If nothing else, the ability to add a backup key, or a GPG signature key for your account. That allows revocation of your identity if the keys are compromised or need rotation.
Then clients can check if an account has revoked previous keys and show a history. And compromised accounts can be filtered from view, or if a new key is added and signed by GPG, rotated to the new identity.
Good Morning!
Broad Tasks for today.
- Trip to town to get mail. (30km drive each way)
- Put up another truss on my cabin.
- Feed puppies & spend time with them.
- Help mom in the garden when she inevitably asks for a hand with something.
- Tinker on coding project if time permits.
- Read more of the wheel of time series if I can squeeze in a few min.
But before any of that… I freaking need Coffee… so, off to boil the Kettle…
So what you’re saying is, you hate Israel more than you love your own country of America? & that hatred is what’s dictating your vote?
My Sweatheart Ellie.
1/4 German Shepherd
1/4 Red Heeler
1/4 Coonhound
1/4 Black Labrador.
