Avatar
Luk₿lack 🧡🎩💜⚡
46d1a2beabc36c1ce97a06ac8715667168956d05a0c8e9490f8a1c1d4f28c538
#Nostr is an amazing place! 💜 #Bitcoin is the way! 🧡 #Cashu Tokens: lukblacksats@sats.contact Nerds Online Shitposting The Revolution == #Nostr Strategic Beef Reserve

Why does #Coracle suggest #SimpleX for DM?

Isn't there anymore improvements? #asknostr

Replying to Avatar Edward Snowden

People really don't realize how utterly dependent modern surveillance is on the idea that everybody is carrying a phone — which is always tracked. Their car has a cellular modem in it — which is always tracked. 99% of investigation is one guy and a search box. If you're not low-hanging fruit, you aren't gonna merit the Eye of Sauron of manual, well-resourced, focused team attention—and if you did, you probably planned ahead for it, right? Because it's not a mystery what would get you on Santa's Naughty List.

Anyway, the point is that even in a big city, the phoneless guy in a "covid" mask is going to be invisible to anything less than that exhaustive manual investigation — at least for a few more years. That may go away once they start networking all the cameras and having AI start trying to match up clothing sets moving from camera to camera, butthat capability is hard to hide, so it'll be in the news. And it won't work that well in places with less camera density and, perhaps, for people who wear the most-common outfits (the visual equivalent of a "shared fingerprint").

Remember: Phones are useful, but dangerous. And the people who will still wear covid masks to the beach are helping to normalize facial obscurity—regardless of their intention. Don't be mean to them. Encourage them to wear them everywhere. For passport photos. In police booking photos. At the customs desk. Family portraits! The sky is the limit—let them push the boundaries so that you don't have to.

nostr:note1dufu3sutqcu4er2pj9k7zmxdf7k23qxn3eskwdr8tp3ffvg7g9qqsv4lrc

Replying to Avatar calle

*working on transaction fees for cashu*

This will protect mints from denial of service attacks and incentivize wallets to use good coin selection algorithms to gain an economic advantage.

Fee settings I'm currently using are at 0.1 sats per input, always rounded up the the next smallest denomination (1 sat) at the level of a transaction.

According to these super useful measurements by nostr:npub1thunderat5g552cuy7umk624ct5xe4tpgwr2jcjjq2gc0567wgrqnya79l, around 50% of transactions (up to 1M sats) will have less than 10 inputs (1 sat fees) and almost all will have < 20 (2 sat fees). That's pretty good.

If you are ok with overpaying a couple of sats, the chance of finding a good selection of coins increases substantially which means that as a sender, you can remain offline for most payments.

Good stuff.

Why at raising inputs the fees increase?

It seems more interactive than a simple KIND 1.. but I think is more useful for content like Polls

TRUMP IS NOT A BITCOINER 🎩💜⚡🧡

I think it's a good idea.. It'd be a great impact message to no-coiners who can start to interest where the phrase come from 🎩💛💜⚡