What if we do this, but with Bitcoin as logo?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Fixing potholes is obviously a good thing. But wouldn’t then adding a logo be considered defacement of public property (and wouldn’t that be a crime)?

it would be a unique answer to the question of “but who will build the roads?” #ProofOfWork

Is this not a problem:

“In most countries, marking or painting property without permission is considered by property owners and civic authorities as defacement and vandalism, which is a punishable crime”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti

In most countries, bowing to the authorities will make you a sycophant.

Fixing the crumbling public infrastructure & marking it as having been fixed by #Bitcoin isn't any sort of legitimate property crime. It's not even private property that is being repaired & it is saving private vehicles from damage so there is really not even the possibility of a victim.

I agree, but the crime wouldn’t be “fixing potholes”. It would be the markings made afterwards.

Vitor, você pode dar uma força para as campanhas pelo Rio Grande do Sul, meu parceiro?

I like it 👍

Great warning signs to avoid cointards in your area.

Only if all materials used are purchased with BTC.

❤️

Bitcoin fixes holes in your budget.

But wait, if the people and businesses take care of the roads, then what do we need taxes and government for?

I think it's a good idea.. It'd be a great impact message to no-coiners who can start to interest where the phrase come from 🎩💛💜⚡

The only way we can bandaid our crumbling infrastructure is paid for by ads. Totally not a bad omen