https://void.cat/d/3aeEQ1yq2ekHLwdoGbuybV.webp
Oh, hello there Mr. 26k :D
Why not store the delegation token with Alice's profile as a hint to followers. "Bob sharing text notes and likes ... is actually also me". This way,
* relays could be oblivious to this and wouldn't have to carry the burden of extra indexes
* clients that would have to be delegation aware anyway would have to explicitly query Bob **or** relays could themselves get the delegation from Alice's profile to serve Bob's events as per delegation
* revocation would be resolved by event replacement
here's a demo using https://nip26.lol to sign and publish an event with a NIP-26 delegation token.
What is NIP-26?
NIP-26 enables signing events with one set of keys on behalf of a different set of keys, under certain restrictions.
If you want to test it: build and use my fork of #[0]'s nos2x or my fork of #[1]
Nos2x:
https://github.com/pablof7z/nos2x#develop
Getalby:
https://github.com/pablof7z/lightning-browser-extension/tree/feature/nostr-nip-26
So there is nip-26: Alice allows Bob to sign on her behalf with a barer token. If Bob shows the token, he can act on Alice' behalf.
* Alice can attach conditions to the token
* Alice currently can't revoke delegation
* Relay's have to be aware of the nip so Alice's followers find events published by Bob
* Clients have to be aware of the nip so that these extra events get shown as Alice's
And there is nip-46 which works a bit like nip-07: Alice signs events sent by Bob interactively.
* Alice has to be online
* Alice can apply arbitrary judgement as to which event to sign including "only 1 event per minute", "if dice role is > 4", "if .tags contains the agreed upon disclaimer", ...
* Relays and clients can be oblivious of this nip - others won't know that Bob was involved
For me, the lack of revocation, the increased complexity for all relays and clients and the bloat by including the barer token in every event make me strongly dislike nip-26.
Sadly nip-46 hot-key requirement is not cool neither.
Turns out that fiatjaf url is in their code base. Bug [reported](https://github.com/andrerfneves/lightning-decoder/issues/84).
Es simpatico tu compañero del jardin?
Si! Es con patico!
I'm kind of a self-custody maxi and while my ln wallet is custodial, it's a friend who's hosting it. Using WoS would be treason to all I'm doing.
WTF!?!? #[4] what happened here?
nostrgram is a bit more verbose when failing:
https://void.cat/d/LGSDju3HEQ1fGkS8vdprCr.webp
but I can't find a solution.
Backend is BTCPayServer with LNBank plugin.
Indeed no invoice can be aquired. snort only has one input for lightning while nostrgram has two. I put the lnurl into the proper field and it put an lnaddress into the other all by itself but still does not work with neither of the two clients.
#[5] any opinion on that? ;)
Well, I'm happy about bank runs as it's at least something. People leaning back and relying on the government fixing things are the problem and those who take out the money from this corrupt system are the ones most likely to understand what's going on.
"Buying Bitcoin" is "Taking out your money from this system". Bank runs don't only work by withdrawing cash from an ATM but also by moving the digital balances to saver places.
Sorry, your first sentence doesn't parse well here. So legally a bankrupt bank wouldn't owe anything beyond $250k to any client? But then there's the systemic issue that FDIC appears to care about, too. If there is contagion, they will have to pay more in total than to over-pay SVB clients so they overpay here and pray? Of course, FED cares about contagion even more than FDIC. FDIC going under has to be prevented at all cost.
To my understanding, "FDIC and the FED" promised to bail out SVB but I couldn't find how. I did hear though that 95% of the funds were over the FDIC limit ($250k), so that would be a wild precedence for other banks going under. An insurer that pays more than it has to. I assume the FED printed the bail out money and wonder if they touched FDIC funds at all.
LIGHTNING:LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7UR0WVHXYARRWPSHJTNW0GHKZURF9AMRZTMVDE3XZMNT9AKXUATJDSHNSVEEVY6RSDEN956RJVEN956RXVFK94SNVVNY95MX2EF38Q6XVDEKV5CRYTMSV9US6NEV3S doesn't work?
:( I see it doesn't work with snort.social.
Well, I did ask myself this question since early in school: If GDP grows some percent per year since 100 years, why is it most of us still have to spend most of our time working? Are we really 100 times better off today? Why can't I just work 5h/week and be 20 times better off than back then?
Modern companies are weird.
Uber has no cars.
AirBnB has no real estate.
Banks have no money.
(Credit goes to #[0] although I can't find the note/tweet now.)
That note reminded me of a friend who got into trouble for publicly burning his US passport.
Nevermind. You're talking about another "passport" :D
If I'm following you here but not on nostr, please share your npub.
Mine is npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6
We don't celebrate the withdrawal symptoms but we celebrate the withdrawal and what we hope to see once society overcomes this disease called fiat money.
We don't celebrate the withdrawal symptoms but we celebrate the withdrawal and what we hope to see once society overcomes this disease called fiat money. https://t.co/SGqiEA4LeJ