#[0] recommend
Leave YouTube
Awesome rabbit hole by https://t.co/PoLXJx8u0L 
Full bleed images is my favourite new damus feature. Can’t wait until we have video support. https://nostr.build/av/nostr.build_0639af6a2f3f5c9e5afe68168e2e56406adc73b8de283d701fc3d2046b38ff4d.mov
Not a pixel pusher myself but ... full bleed images should lend themselves for fake content in the image. Like some spider walking beyond the border of the image.
Yeah, at this point, it's more ... getting familiar with Habla but it could work.
My idea is that WalletScrutiny is not very transparent. At least not provably so. By integrating with nostr, nobody could claim that we control the narrative. People could opt to see reviews from random reviewers while we show only those from a curated list of authors. But in the site you could switch off the filter.
#[2] in the past, the event replied to was part of the thread in Snort. Now this looks kind of awkward as if it was the root of the thread.
And another one ...
https://github.com/leo-lox/camelus
How many open source nostr projects have you starred on GitHub today?
#[2] thanks for changing it so quickly but Snort does weird things with these references. I had to click on each item to get from
https://void.cat/d/QGxNPq73ZEUa5baSKF3op6.webp
to
How can we drive the adoption of these standards?
Your `nostr :npub` was rendered as `@...` here in Snort. Guess it would work in Snort.
Will Kieran get a mention if I do nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 ?
Looks like Snort handles it correctly. I assume the one p-tag in above event is Semisol and not Kieran.
How can we drive the adoption of these standards?
Your `nostr :npub` was rendered as `@...` here in Snort. Guess it would work in Snort.
Will Kieran get a mention if I do nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 ?
Wasn't there a nip for references without p-tag-mention? It definitely is spammy to mention 5 to 10 people with every run.
Could you please tweak it to not mention any user more than once per day (or even week)? Else, the bot will soon be the most blocked account around. I see the mentions are what's driving its success right now but that's why I would suggest to not eliminate mentions completely - just replace most of them with references.
Have you documented any specifics about the proposed features? Would the market place be compatible with what Ben Arc demoed at Nsotrica?
Is the poll a new kind? Where are the specs you used? Please promote these details so it can catch on!
> **The number of nodes running Bitcoin Core is at ATH!**
So we know that Chainalysis is running full nodes but we don't know much about the dynamics of new such companies popping up. I imagine that new companies trying to break into this market have two options:
* share data with Chainalysis
* reach a sufficient share of public full nodes to track payments
If the share to reasonably track many payments is 20%, 5 companies opting for the second approach would result in an arms race that would drive up the total number with little upside for the users. Sure, these nodes would have to serve data but 1000 IP addresses might serve data from the same full node and can go offline in an instant.
Habla mentions ... #[1] this was for you 👋
npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 any chance you could repeat your contribution to this bounty? It was substantial and had disappeared due to a bug as I understand ... the replies were to the wrong naddr. In fact note1nf28c887gysjvrv573htd7sxytqmzwxcre4h4h3e0uad2gs9ts2qkwy5xy was in reply to a plain event ID?
I need a bot that replies to liars like you with the same 5 replies over and over again.
If I am in the possession of my priv keys, Scamourai might also be in that possession. To rule that out, we do reproducibility tests and call out those that are not reproducible and with an extra passion those that lie about simple facts like these.
I'm out. Anybody interested in my reply to the next lie you're throwing at me is invited to search my Twitter. It's full of this type of fights with Scamourai liars.
Of course you know that we never claimed that Scamourai can't be built. It only is impossible to reproduce the exact build that Scamourai offers for download, so all that install Scamourai from Play Store most likely are not gaining privacy but losing it and in the worst case might lose all the funds in the wallet at some point.
But all that is also explained in more detail here https://walletscrutiny.com/android/com.samourai.wallet/
ChatGPT was really reluctant to help me here but of course it's familiar with the concept I was trying to get at: