Fair. But let me give a contrarian utilitarian take: because every bit of energy that goes into Bitcoin strengthens it’s network effects, even these people should be encouraged to put in their energy to Bitcoin. Personally I want them to come last but still
Do bitcoiners have some moral responsibility to save people like this or is NGMI sufficient
Btw is Jason on nostr? If you have his npub I’d appreciate it
Interesting. I wonder why don’t they give any credit to Putin or Zelenskyy?
Do people mean solely or that it was a contributing factor? Or are you talking to people without nuance?
Gotta just blindly trust them man what are you a science denier ??
I’ve heard an argument that given the constraints of rare earth and others necessary to fully replace everything with electrical cars. It’s actually smarter to do the hybrids to reduce oil use first and transition later. Not arguing japans actually doing something that smart. But it might actually make sense
Could you help me understand v4v better. I thought it was just a way to describe direct payments for goods and services instead of alternative monetization strategies like ads? Is it something else?
Are you a bit?
Jason lowery and Robert Breedlove defining Bitcoin network as the macrochip is probably the most profound reframing of Bitcoin. If you haven’t watched the interview it’s the much better than JL with WBD.
Interesting. How will they deal with open source projects?
Let’s go!
Oh totally stole it from him and Jason Lowery. I'm not that smart
I guess you could also argue that if you are really a fna of decentralized open source shit a large conference isn't where you'll be?
Probably orange checkmark system. Make it at least costly to lie
Totally wasn't what I was gonna use it for
Yes but perhaps your comparison is wrong. Maybe the current model doesn’t support all 24, just the top2. We only hear about the winners.
Technology reduces prices to 0, so it might not be expensive going forward. (Trying to channel my inner #[2] )