If you take the time to understand it, you leave the paradigm.
It's fairly predictable that the left would be anti bitcoin and shitcoins and the right would be pro bitcoin and shitcoins whilst nobody in that paradigm would take the time to understand what they are.
The problem with Jason Lowery's thesis is that it focuses too much on bitcoin as a network beyond the money, when there could be no greater positive impact on humanity in the present than the adoption of bitcoin as money. I am convinced of this.
It has much more going for it than ordinals or "blockchain not bitcoin", but it's rather avoiding the point and imagining another to satisfy some other interest.
You can overthink this.
What makes it upstoppable now, are it's defenders
If we are to have sound money, we must agree upon what the sound money is. There is no alternative to #Bitcoin
Permissionless money with finity can only exist singly.
Maybe bitcoin wasn't always unstoppable, but it is now.
Because it requires complete responsibility.
Bitcoin is the first right to require no enforcement.
Nowhere does beer like the Czechs.
#grownostr
Bitcoin is a nascent black hole of value. Eventually, even the most powerful idiots in the world will realise the futility of resisting a collapsing star.
If a government agency is secretive by necessity, it must be doing evil.
Most people I talk to know they are financially trapped.
Seems like a lot of people would rather accept that they are trapped than accept there is a way out and they can do something about it if they take responsibility.
Enjoy it while it's exciting.
The creation and adoption of Bitcoin will have more movies, books, songs and other media written about it than any other event in human history.
There is no aspect of bitcoin more important than any other. Every part is essential to the whole.
There is no second best.
Law by consensus.
Freedom by responsibility.
Money by choice.