Yeah you create chat bots with custom prompts. No apparent limit but they probably throttle AI quality somehow.
One of mine is "A helpful coding assistant with comprehensive knowledge of programming languages such as: AutoHotkey (AHK), JavaScript, C++, etc."
Another is "A Dungeon Master's assistant, for playing the Dungeon & Dragons 5th Edition tabletop game"
Cool right now I'm using ora.ai for free, but I wonder if it's limiting my GPT juice...
Looks like that's a good way to hang upside down and let your spine chill
You know, it's pretty miraculous that such a great message has survived 2000 years of humanity. I'll give you that.
When you say revealed, do you mean via ink splotches, people on podiums, or first-hand divine vision? Because those are very different things.
Feel free to quote your reference(s) and we can dig into it, but I respect your opinion, regardless.
True, but I believe God expects us to use our imagination in an attempt to understand his Word and to fathom the wonders of His creation.
Also, consider that eternity doesn't necessarily mean infinity. IMO it simply means a state of existence independent of this timeline.
So it may only seem permanent from our perspective.
Thanks, you too. I will, yet I believe I have much room for improvement.
And the only way to do that IMO is wrestle with our faith, or 'wrestle with God,' which caused Jacob to be called Israel. Was that questioning God?
That said, I agree it's important not to overthink or overcomplicate something which essentially transcends the intellect. I think we must come to terms with God on every level, however, including the intellect.
IMO Exploring the nature and implications of your faith is the exact opposite of "questioning God." As Christians, our mandate is to follow Christ's example. Christ was constantly discussing and questioning conventional interpretation of God.
Unquestioning obedience to splotches of ink or people on podiums is one of the more prevalent forms of idolatry.
Don't you think that being dismissive about this is actually enabling Lucifer? How can you expect to be able to recognize the 'false light of Lucifer' if you dismiss a conversation about the nature of truth and God?
I see hell as ultimately merciful and hopeful, however. You wouldn't want to exist eternally in a state of sin. There are also reasons to believe that many in hell will eventually be redeemed. Only those who truly want to cease to exist will accomplish it.
"4 Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don’t understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God." 2 Cor 4:4 NLT
Hell isn't discussed very thoroughly in the Bible. IMO there's a high chance this world itself is 'hell.' Which is actually very good news, because it suggests we get more chances to make ourselves more pleasing to God than just in this one life.
So I'm of the Johnny Cash persuasion, especially given my spiritual experience similar to that of the lyrics.
For sure. "Close" is relative, anyway. Perhaps it's like a mathematical limit, there are many teachings that say God is unreachable. Yet it's a central concept of most religions is God's oneness with His creation.
bota.org is what triggered my spiritual experiences. It's Christian mysticism but incorporates many teachings from the Gita. Check out "Spirit of the Upanishads," recommended in the coursework. https://www.yogebooks.com/english/atkinson/1907-01upanishads.pdf
It's a fair opinion, but super foolish to paint them with the same brush as if nobody could have a close relationship with God.
True, and some years BTC might go up astronomically, given the untapped $Trillions of market cap.
Is real estate a shitcoin? TLDR: yes.
I've heard many people refer to real estate as a shitcoin but it's hard to make sense of that statement without the numbers. Everyone still needs a place to live right? So I made a shitty spreadsheet just to get an idea and I was very surprised. I did my best to actually puff up the real estate numbers and use ultra conservative numbers in bitcoin.
I ran the numbers for a multifamily triplex with rental income on an FHA loan (3.5% down payment). The rental income really dampens the amount you spend on your mortgage payments. I also did not account for any vacancy periods, troublesome tenants, or maintenance fees in real estate. Any financial planner that fails to calculate these factors would be committing fraud and the return on real estate compared to bitcoin in this case would STILL not even be close. On the other side with bitcoin, I used a conservative 30% annual appreciation over 30 years. Yes I know it fluctuates and, over a long enough time frame, the average returns have been much higher historically but I really wanted to steelman real estate. The DCA BTC website helped me a lot with this. If you began a weekly DCA 8 years ago, you would be up 1,142% today which is 143% annually! I believe a 30% annual return on bitcoin is conservative to say the least.
The numbers I used were from a lender's estimate I got in March of this year. Note that interest rates are higher now. The triplex was quoted at $700k. Cash to close was $37,273 (remember this number). If you spent that $37,273 on financing a triplex and lived in one unit while renting out the other two, after 30 years, your property would be worth $2,134,644. I used an average 4% annual appreciation in real estate and subtracted the 1% annual property tax to reach this number. Yes I know there are factors like income tax and depreciation but I want to keep the numbers simple.
Now the fun part: what would bitcoin have done during that 30 years if you invested the same cash to close in it? I used the rental price of a local apartment that was $25,140 for the first year and I added a 3.2% annual inflation rate every year. Again, I am really trying to steelman the case for owning your own home. After 30 years, your $37,273 in bitcoin would be worth $73,882,979!
Eminent domain is the government’s “right” to take your property for public use. Even if you have your keys and deed, you still only have a claim to your shitcoin. The Sovereign Individual thesis is much more doable with bitcoin. You can easily leave the jurisdiction that is mistreating you when you are not tied down to real estate. If you spent the rest of your life DCAing into bitcoin and lived as a renter, you would not have to worry about the major headaches that come with property management. Is the jurisdiction you are living in forcing you to eat ze bugs and stay home because there are aliens outside? No problem, take your bitcoin and go somewhere else. This is what freedom money is!
This is the part where I say this is not financial advice and do your own research. I don’t know the future and I don’t claim that anything above will actually play out that way. My numbers may be wrong, if so please let me know.
#bitcoin #nostr
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_8795436012607390051690656797.webp https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_2018659844549131941690656805.webp https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_6987506120420996261690656811.webp
30% for 30 years though? It's conservative for now, but perhaps optimistic for 10y from now.
You have to assume that at some point Bitcoin levels out. It's going up forever, but not 30% annual forever.


