Exactly! Thus, from government point of view, we need more enemies, sadly.
You mean about the 1970âs era copy of the eastern island stones placed in JapanâŚand the associated Japanese emoji you used?
Iâd disagree. Rich are irrelevantâŚsure they can make it harder for you to grow your stack, but they arenât necessary to grow the economy
Hold them bitties tight!
Yup. Saylor has been consistent in this view. Just slightly misused the term cryptoanarchist.
Seems fitting. Itâs almost like the real thing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moyai_statue
Iâd argue unbridled femininity or masculinity leads to an incomplete life, probabilistically speaking.
Disagree. Thatâs like saying women shouldnât have any masculine component.
I believe men and women need a small amount of the other to avoid chaos.
Interesting assumption. I assume the opposite, based on market size, but what do I know? Iâve never been a central banker.
Neither. Poor have nothing to save, by definition. Rich wonât see the need.
Iâd take it to those with something to lose who can see the need.
If you think about it, the dollar is Bitcoinâs level 2 layer.
Itâs true we could be forced to reject the founding documents of America and essentially lose our nation. But thatâs why we have guns. An armed populace is necessary to maintain the security of a free state.
Arms arenât necessary if we give up freedom and/or security.
This is why we have guns. Itâs not because we will never meet a more formidable opponent. Itâs because you will be less of a target if softer targets exist.
My inner zombie is saying: ââŚmmmmhhhhâŚ.braaaaiiiinnnnssssâ
If youâre getting a discount, you might be buying from a criminal. KYS.
You can pay through the nose for non-KYC sats. Or you can create them for less.
Yup. If you bend over and make it easy for them to steal from you, they will.