I am not a BTCPay customer today, and I anticipate a feature request that may benefit BTCPay customers by reducing the custodial risk nostr:npub1j8y6tcdfw3q3f3h794s6un0gyc5742s0k5h5s2yqj0r70cpklqeqjavrvg :
If custodial account reaches (a user set, non trivial amount of) X sats, automagically transfer from my custodial to my non-custodial wallet.
Already possible with Prism plugin I believe 😉
It's the flow they used at Baltic Honeybadger last year
Not sure if it's this new thing where they're making a fund to "time the bitcoin market" 🤭
So ironically, y'all remember when fees were a flat 0.0001 BTC and that was pretty ok?
Except, was Liquid ever really anyone's main 🥲
nostr:npub1hcwcj72tlyk7thtyc8nq763vwrq5p2avnyeyrrlwxrzuvdl7j3usj4h9rq pulling out of the US definitely hurt too. Since that happened and I switched to nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 the amount of #zaps I’ve received have gone down significantly. I’m still zapping though.
🤜⚡️🤛
Oof yea Zeus implementation isn't the best. Maybe try Alby or LNBits

Introducing Elements Academy, a new video instructional series to help you learn Liquid and the open-source Elements platform it's built on. You'll learn how to:
🌊 Set up and run a Liquid node
💡 Peg-in to Liquid trustlessly using your own node
🦄 Use the elements-cli for features like confidential transactions and issued assets
⛓ Create your own #Bitcoin sidechain with custom consensus rules and features using the Elements platform
You can access Elements Academy today via:
Build On L2: https://community.liquid.net/c/elements-academy/
YouTube: https://youtu.be/gkQfnwYLyI0?si=r94W9HkjI17aVybo
More info in the announcement post: https://blog.liquid.net/elements-academy/
Let us know what you think and what other topics you'd like us to cover in future tutorials! Thanks!
Any chance you all can start packaging Elements for node projects like Start9
Wow, I wouldn’t have guessed nostr:npub1earna05hx6ax38r33h3atmecjzdu547m8suw87w70aw6mlyga4hsqcja5j is that far ahead yet.
They'v been really aggressive on nostr inside their own app
... which is really annoying when you consider that the only people who can zap those addresses and folks with IPs from select states 😑
I don't understand
One's an independent protocol that's openly licensed, and the other's a private company building a subset of things on top of that protocol with more restrictive licenses for its products
I don't necessarily agree with the more restrictive licenses even for derivative things, but I don't see how that affects the entire Fedimint project
... unless you're saying that the private company Fedi has an outsized influence on the underlying public protocol?
The nostr:npub1uq70uqgas9pyhds2zt57kr9se8rg3s68ztphjnq82ts8rzeknmeql7u0c2 software license agreement is really bad...
eCash projects should learn from the mistakes of Chaum, instead of doubling down in the same direction. It is ESSENTIAL for these tools to be FOSS.
> You are not permitted to lease, rent, distribute or sublicense the Software or any rights therein.
> You also may not install the Software on a network server, use the Software in a time-sharing arrangement or in any other unauthorized manner.
> Further, no license is granted to you in the human readable code of the Software (source code).
> You agree that you have no right, power or authority to make any modifications to or unauthorized copies of the Software.
> You may reproduce and provide one (1) copy of the Software and Documentation for each device, computer or workstation on which the Software is installed. [QubesOS users go lol]
> You agree not to modify, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or create derivative works of the Software or assist someone in performing such prohibited acts.
> You agree not to import or export the Software or any Documentation (or any copies thereof) or any products utilizing the Software or any Documentation in violation of any applicable laws or regulations of the United States or the country to which you have imported or exported.
Just to be clear "Fedi" is a separate thing from the underlying "Fedimint" project which is MIT licensed
What's that?
On searching I found "Hive Social", and then "Hive blockchain"?
gm nostr 🌞 short fiat, long sats
nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx sats bill on nostr:npub155m2k8ml8sqn8w4dhh689vdv0t2twa8dgvkpnzfggxf4wfughjsq2cdcvg plugin
It's evolving 😍
I see lots of folks using vercel or netlify
Agreed this doesn't scale well with the sheer amount of different things that's required to operate a resilient node and set of apps on top of it
... not sure how many (even tech savvy) folks will be able to keep up with these over time
... it _is_ a great set of resources you've put together here though!
nostr:npub18lzls4f6h46n43revlzvg6x06z8geww7uudhncfdttdtypduqnfsagugm3 is delivering amazing speech, wish we had more investors like him in Nostr.

Were these recorded 👀
How so if the adversary is state pressure? Couldn't they come after you for just being part of the quorum with some new arbitrary rule?
Why cowardly, what should they have done differently if the pressure from the USG is likely happening now?
Alternatives were to:
- wait around un-registered in the US market and likely incriminate themselves further
- start pursuing kyc and compliance, which would also mean they'd absolutely need to shut down asap until compliant
They made the only move they could as a custodial service imo. It's why nostr:npub13ljnkd633c7maxatymv3y2fqq8vt3qk7j3tt0vytv90eztwgha9qmfcfhw has never served US users from the start
