nostr:nprofile1qqs99d9qw67th0wr5xh05de4s9k0wjvnkxudkgptq8yg83vtulad30gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmdqy2hwumn8ghj7ct8vaezumn0wd68ytnvv9hxg0hrryf I saw that you called out a pair of wallets as insecure. I have narrowed to these above based on my own test usage and select criteria. But, are there any among these for which you are aware of vulnerabilities? Thanks for any detail. I never want to lead someone to purchase a problematic solution.
The Passport also has the same issues. The Jade does not have them, but has the tradeoff that instead of a SE it uses a cloud server to act as a SE.
The Trezor SE is good but it still has non-optimal bits in terms of design.
waiting for the CI pipeline
the answer is in your post, and you may look at my profile
nostr:npub1sgx8tkmn2gm4s788tssy5kgx0qjw9q8efda7wmg4afuyx2smdcjq2q7wnj
also nostr.land access added
the nut has been found after 20 hours
nostr:note1amq005x6hpfwtzhgu4nwhf6t2cck549unc8lnuexd2ze92gfa75sz3p543
no
the answer has been found
no the answer has been found
then the nut shall remain unknown
I honestly did not expect it to get this many attempts
to clarify
1) THE ANSWER CONTAINS NUT
2) THE ANSWER CONTAINS ITS SIZE
3) THE ANSWER CONTAINS A DESIGNATOR OF WHAT IT DOES
4) THE ANSWER IS NOT THE COMMON NAME FOR THE NUT
5) THE ONLY REFERENCE TO THE ANSWER IS ON A PAGE THAT CONTAINS INFORMATION USERS MUST REVIEW AND SUBMIT TO TO USE THE NUT
