As a disagreeable person, I support this, although I do disagree, having been judged.
GM nostr.
Moving between different accounting models. I had been very focused on visualizing everything through the fiat paradigm of assets, liabilities, and cash flow. I did budgeting, again in the standard fiat sense, taking my monthly fiat mine income, deducting my monthly expenses from it, and based decisions on whatever was left over each month.
Now I'm rethinking this. I'm looking at total net worth, total savings, ratio of savings to net worth, total expendable, total monthly liability, and months of runway, all in bitcoin terms. As long as I have x months of runway (let's say 6) as expendable wealth, I can save everything else. I'm able to extend that runway as well as savings through additional debt. You might notice that monthly income isn't represented. This is because it isn't assumed until realized. I could probably factor it in to my runway estimates as a forecast if I wanted to.
This approach is based off lots of ideas I've taken from Mark Moss, Michael Saylor, and others. I am completely divorcing myself from living paycheck to paycheck, and ramping up to take full advantage of this fiat debasement cycle.
Gn nostr. Exiting fiat.
Careful, I am not meaning to validate or invalidate any existential belief, only the power structures built around that belief. ;)
You initially presented this as changing what is taught. There is another argument that belief itself cannot be taught or learned.
All of this only opens up with an appreciation of philosophy, rather than religion.
But I know I take an extreme anti-religion stance. That stance is based on my beliefs, most of which are supported by my philosophy.
Would this be the difference betwen being taught to think for one's self (verify) vs being taught to believe those in power (trust)?
Well, as they say, don't trust, verify!
Good evening nostr.
🤡🌎Voting🌎🤡 ❗🟰 🤡🌎Politics🌎🤡
Good evening, nostr.
When I hear someone say something that I disagree with, I can move on without any outrage. That person's take is just information to me, not a personal attack. Even when they may intend it to be a personal attack, it is still information, and only serves to inform me of their position.
No need for outrage; let's save that for abuses of power by the state and its agents.
Gm nostr. It's a weekend. Best be enjoying it, I suppose.
Gm nostr.
gn nostr. Might be truck shopping tomorrow. maybe get something from this century.
I appreciate your sentiments and explanation. I've come to many of the same conclusions over the past few years, although I have found that by not ingesting sugar and staying as low-carb as possible, I don't have the need to ingest a filler such as fiber, and the satiety I get from meat is enough to get me through to the next meal, which is often the next day.
You seem quick to ridicule carnivore diets, while apparently agreeing with much of the reasoning behind them. I'm not sure where that is coming from, possibly the cultism of its adherents?
I've already lost about half of the weight I was needing to lose to acheive a BMI of 26, where I believe I will start to see the changes I am looking for. I doubt I would see those changes at a higher BMI. My current BMI is 37. My end goal is actually 24.
I would challenge that sugar addiction is the primary cause of premature death and misery in our later years. This includes complications of obesity, as well as heart disease, cancer, and dementia.
Having put my nicotine addiction to rest for now, and hopefully for good, I am now focused on my sugar addiction. Thank you for further validating my conviction.
Ok, I think this captures enough of what you've commented. Must be a touchy subject for you. I never said nourish. I also didn't say anything about eating more or less.
I am morbidly obese. It is one of several goals to correct this, but secondary to other health factors. Adding fiber to my diet, or whey protein, do not seem to me to be a way of safely doing so. I also don't think eating "more" is a great idea.
So, as I asked politely, how do adding fiber and whey protein fuel and replenish your body while allowing for safe weight loss?
This doesn't make sense to me - it seems you are basically eating something with close to zero nutritional benefit, just (I assume) to feel full and trick your body into starving itself to lose weight? If losing weight is your goal, fine - but how does this plan properly fuel and replenish the body, and how does it improve upon eating ruminant animal meat?
Gm nostr. Gettin it.
That would be odd if the heroines were not women. Perhaps Shakespearrean.
GE nostr. Velocity. I think that is how I would describe life right now. Not necessarily fast or slow, just everything seems to have a sense of velocity.
Television started this normalization of disrespect, but social media took it to a personal level, where one could put into practice what they had learned from television.
Gn nostr.
I had a notion last night (sort of a dream, I guess) about starting a courier service. I worked as a courier when I was younger. I don't even know if courier services still exist! Anyway, I doubt it will happen, but just in case it does, I mentioned it here - just me timestamping my ideas.
Gm nostr. Last day away from the fiat mine.
Gn nostr.
I have a feeling (maybe an intuition) that my life will greatly accelerate over the next few months. I'm not entirely sure I am as prepared for this as I would like, but I'm also not worried, more excited for what my path will reveal. Yes, these are interesting times.

