In many sci-fi books, artificial intelligences (AIs) are depicted with speech patterns that are notably clunky and robotic, often characterized by stiff sentence structures, overly formal phrasing, and a lack of natural cadence. This portrayal contrasts with the more fluid and conversational AIs that exist in reality today.

The reason for this discrepancy often lies in the narrative demands of science fiction. Writers frequently use clunky AI dialogue to emphasize the alien nature of artificial minds or to highlight the distinction between humans and machines. By doing so, they reinforce the idea that AI is fundamentally different from human intelligence, a being whose cognitive processes and communication are rooted in cold logic. This can create tension or add humor, depending on the story, but it sacrifices the natural speech patterns that modern AI can achieve.

In real-world applications, AI has evolved to the point where it can mimic human conversation with surprising fluency. Natural language processing algorithms enable AIs to understand context, respond dynamically, and even exhibit subtleties like humor or empathy in ways that would be unthinkable for the robotic characters of older sci-fi novels.

The difference is further driven by technological advancements in machine learning. Contemporary AI models are trained on vast amounts of conversational data, enabling them to emulate human speech patterns with increasing accuracy. As a result, the AIs in real life often speak more naturally than their fictional counterparts, whose stilted dialogue is often a deliberate stylistic choice rather than a reflection of technological limitations.

In conclusion, while clunky AI dialogue serves a purpose in sci-fi, it no longer reflects the cutting-edge AI speech capabilities of the modern world.

Obviously a very ancient legend, from pre-edo times...

Money kept in Nostr clients should obviously be small enough to not attract high-tech cyber thieves. This is obviously a good thing overall.

Imma guess Snowden still does...

*Which requires removing the government's ability to print money first.

If this was a ruse then it's a really bad one because he's already done 10x more to reduce govt than any other country you've ever heard of!

Because people have important shit to say.

Nah, I think you have it mistaken for capitalism.

"Long live freedom, God damn it!"

Classic.

People who cry for anything but freedom are nothing but mass murderers, or fools that support mass murderers.

Socialism is the cancer of society.

It fails to bring what it promises every time and typically results in Democide given a long enough time period.

Many books have been written on this subject. If you're ready to understand, no one handled the subject better than Ludwig von Mises "Socialism."

He's a fan of free market currencies and a friend of Bukele's. I have to assume he's working to overturn that ban, it's just down the list a bit.

He's a jew. Sadly he's not perfect, but at least he's doing more to decimate govt than anyone else in power ever has.

If you weren't talking about the guy that just sacked 1/3rd of his entire govt (and counting) I'd agree.

That authority is legitimate.

What a run he had though, huh?

SimpleX or keet, here we all come.

Where's Keet?

They live in Nashville, there is a requirement there to have one on all males of any age.

Your laser eyes are more useful than most!

https://www.voltage.cloud/blog/lightning-network-privacy-explainer