As you stretch out block times it becomes easier for people to game the work factor. Might work for Mars... probably not out of the solar system.
> A Bitcoiner can't trust politicians, politicians are all bad people.
No one should trust politicians, or the people who trust them. But... the beauty of Bitcoin is that we don't have to? It's not really my personality, but I kinda liked the GFY "trust no one" version of nostr.
A consensus protocol will always be limited by the speed of communication. I've got nothing against interplanetary consensus, as long as we agree this requires faster than light communication.
But, locking funds into an L2 lets you run a local economy of the locked in size.
I the best thing we got was a transparent improvement to everyday things using LLMs. Most people never use them let alone to their potential, so rewriting, summarization, image generation, and less rigid voice commands running entirely locally is a big step up. And it has the Apple restraint and polish – they're not going to suffer another Newton.
I'm not giving that extra memory back though 😎
Ok, "consensus is limited by communication speed".
But, I should have added that L2 mitigates this.
TBF, it could be a Coinbase client. Still, *someone* is burning a lot of value.
If anyone's interested, Coinbase Advanced has spent 500k BTC over the last 24 months keeping the price of BTC low.
https://cryptoquant.com/asset/btc/chart/exchange-flows/exchange-reserve?exchange=coinbase_advanced
Primarily Coinbase Advanced. They have 800k left 
According to the second image, 2.5M. What you really want to know is how much the one dumping it has left. $60B is a lot of B.
Which exchange spent the current equivalent of $60B keeping the price low?
Make a new npub and post through tor
It's always the best signal nostr:note1fnlfy2v54v3ksywg6gm8zshw330th5a7q62vetuhpaxw0l0smz0qvk9dxc
I think this is just a bloom filter. With only a few target words and a lot of potential ones, even with a multihash scheme you'll end up with a lot of false positives. For those you'll also need some way to reliably rule them out, and a radix tree is one implementation.
Sounds like a Bloom filter in front of a radix trie