Both of you are correct, because your definitions of ownership are not the same. There are more people like him in the world than there are people like you, which is why Bitcoin growth is so slow. But, there are times when people rapidly recognize the difference, and adoption happens soon after
Everyone talks about vibe coding as if this isn't how most software is written. Yeah, that hackweek level effort isn't production ready... if it's worth it, just keep going
Good point. If the link stays private until it's dead you actually have a chance for the data to stay private
I hope you find more in life. By the looks of it that should be some form of Protestantism, but I'm not familiar with any denomination that preaches whatever this is
Great! Since everyone pays their share and you aren't paying any taxes you won't need any of those roads, civil protection, enforced property rights, military protection, etc that the state provides. I would make sure no one knows where you are, in case they decide to try out literal piracy 🏴☠️ 🫡
When DVMs?!?
nostr:note15dtx5hwymqjq9kqveta7wtuuk3l3f0xmxhuvkr3vjsqepks9pkwq6tkcva
This might be the current situation, but it doesn't seem fundamental to me. If there's a way to reliably reproduce these issues it should be straightforward to optimize
If "outbox" works, can you not divide the people you're following into chunks and use separate connections to the same relay?
* Except payroll, estate, excise, corporate, state-income, property, sales, duties, tariffs, and inflation
It's not important enough to make a successful single issue campaign
"Holding onto anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die" (common in racing circles)
wasnt bluesky supposed to be decentralized?
alsoz why did nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6mmnw3ezuur4vgkhjsen fund it?
Because it was supposed to be decentralized
What I'm saying is, it's faster to skim something and recognize errors (edit) than it is to produce it (author). Assuming that there's even a vaguely categorical difference between personal and public, you can probably have an LLM separate these things. Each time you see something wrong, explain why it's wrong, and run it again. If nothing else, it's a valuable experiment in the capabilities of current systems. I've found Claude far exceeds my expectations in tasks like these.
🤷🏻♂️ Maybe another LLM pass could identify most of those? Base case, reduction step, recursive call. AI feels no toil