Apple has Siri.

X has Grok.

Amazon has Alexa.

Google has a bunch of ai no one can remember.

OpenAI has ChatGPT / Sama.

Missing any?

Or guillotine, whichever comes first

It's said that it's only 18 bloodlines. Seems like a small sacrifice to change the world.

The younger generation may turn on them before they get the chance. You never know

Here to learn as much as i need to about #bitcoin and #nostr protocol

Teach me something magical 🪄

And I will protect my privacy. But that doesn't mean that most of my bitcoin is destined to buy contracts in my name with anyway.

but you have a right to privacy

Your other income

why do you want to pay with an open book

which everyone can see

which will be visible forever?

KYC #Bitcoin behind your keys is still #Bitcoin. But its also dirty and compromised. You should consider cleaning it.

With respect, while I don’t think the 80 byte OP_RETURN thing should actually be filtered because it’s a lot point by now, there IS a critically important difference between filtering and censoring in this context:

• One is a question of WHAT is allowed in the bitcoin chain, which is a universal policy. Every node does this and this is similar to arguments with RBF and the like. In a sense, this is the only thing bitcoin does, is filter with extreme prejudice, WHAT goes into the chain.

— there is an argument to be had on whether the byte issue is good/bad, but it’s not censoring privacy transactions or coinjoins. It’s a filter that *happens* to catch one kind.

• The other is a question of WHO gets into the blockchain. F2Pool here had the audacity to claim that a certain address, with a certain balance, is owned by some “evil” people because some govt body, without trial or due process, has declared their evil acts and demanded punishment & eviction from market activities.

Regardless of whether this particular kind of filtering should be considered good, or that it potentially sets a bad precedent, they are not the same thing in terms of the danger and subjectivity of the decisions.

Deciding WHAT goes into the chain is a process of defining the bitcoin system, deciding WHO can get into the chain is censorship and violating the basic tenant of neutrality.

The phrase isn’t “Bitcoin is for everything,” it’s “Bitcoin is for everyone. nostr:note14hm0a4xz7v5dmsmslj6h694vmnlytc59k4mv2s254clm3zdcpzmsujjv3x

Teeing off under the moon this morning.

Hey Nostr, a recent conversation I had sparked a bunch of questions about UBI (universal basic income). Anyone read anything interesting (on both sides of the argument) that they’d recommend?

I get the basics but want to go deeper.

#asknostr

It wasn't even 3 BTC. You just needed to invest 3 BTC so you still kept the assets you purchased was my understanding of that program.

Wasn't it initially 3 BTC?