Avatar
xchainlinkx
5ae2c555df35c04481bf04f604c4fa5da2ac15d4d78e59414f82161927e47c0f
Author of soon to be released novel, "Mage Hunter." Follow me on Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/xchainlinkx Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@xchainlinkx Minds: https://www.minds.com/xchainlinkx/

Squishing bugs on Helldivers 2 and then goring heretics on Space Marine 2

#SpaceMarine2 #Helldivers2

https://rumble.com/v5futqh-double-feature-helldivers-2-space-marine-2.html

Will work for sats. I got experience in graphic design, creative writing, IT and Cyber Security

Imagine this. TikTok, but using #Nostr

Replying to Avatar Bitcoin Jungle

Didn't the CIA create Bitcoin? An analysis >>>>>

Although I haven't seen any credible evidence of this, let's just assume for a minute that it was, similar to how the NSA created the Tor network.

The NSA created the Tor network in order to allow operatives to communicate from unfriendly territories without the possiblity of being traced. But, for it to work, enough people had to actually use Tor so that communications could blend in with the crowd to avoid detection.

In order to get people to use it, they had to put it out there in the open. The Tor network is just a piece of open source software that anyone is free to read, analyze, use, fork, copy, and alter. There's no secret sauce. Anyone with the capability of reading computer code can understand the design of the Tor network.

One could draw similar parallels to Bitcoin. The CIA could've created Bitcoin in order to allow funding of programs without touching traditional financial systems of unfriendly countries. But, for it to work, enough people would have to actually use Bitcoin so that transactions could blend in with the crowd to avoid detection.

But, if that were true, then why would they design Bitcoin to have all transactions be publicly visible in a blockchain? To me it seems like they would've designed it similar to other cryptocurrencies, which obfuscates transaction details on the ledger. In short, how does the CIA benefit from having a publicly viewable immutuable leder of their dirty business?

If it were true, why would they design a system that is resistant to censorship? To me it seems like they would've designed it with censorship capabilities, for example with the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, which would allow the person with the most of the coin to censor transactions at will. In short, how does the CIA benefit from having a tool that their enemies can also use freely?

If it were true, why would they design a system that incentivizes decentralization? To me it seems like they would've designed it with centralization in mind, enabling them to leverage that into control over the network. For example, wouldn't they prefer to launch Bitcoin as a business using In-Q-Tel (the venture capital arm of the CIA that invested in Facebook early on)? If a single company "owned" the Bitcoin network, this would enable them to leverage more control over the network and future development.

Just like with Tor, Bitcoin is just computer code. It's open source software that anyone in the world is free to read, analyze, use, fork, modify, or do anything they want with it. There is no secret sauce behind Bitcoin. It has been analyzed, studied, and attacked for 15 years by many of the world's top mathemeticians, cryptographers and security researchers. To date, the Bitcoin network has not been broken.

It's clear when studying the source code of Bitcoin that it's design goals were decentralization, transparency & censorship resistance. Why would the CIA design Bitcoin with these design goals?

There's a quote "A sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic.", known as Clarke's Third Law. The technology behind Bitcoin may appear mysterious and magical to non-technical people, but it is grounded in sound mathematical principles and open-source development.

I fully support the motto "Don't trust, verify", and encourage you to perform your own research from first principles. Maybe you do want to go so far as to learn programming to be able to inspect the source code of Bitcoin first hand. But, even if you don't, I would recommend starting with the Bitcoin whitepaper which explains the design of the network. It's only 8 pages long. I've attached the Bitcoin Whitepaper here. I invite you to read it, study it, and join us at our events around the area to come and discuss with others!

The CIA did not create Bitcoin

Going live to play some Helldivers 2, and then doing Space Marine 2 later

#Helldivers2 #SpaceMarine2

https://rumble.com/v5fqn25-2xs-the-trouble-helldivers-2-space-marine-2.html

No one should be supporting X

Don't forget. You don't HAVE to use USD to transact. Know this when the second great depression happens.

Replying to Avatar HODL

Since almost everyone is stupid about compounding even me.

Here’s the math.

Using nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m's base case (13MM a coin by 2045) as the example…

Saving $20 a week = $1,200,000 in 2045

Saving $50 a week = $3,000,000 in 2045

Saving $100 a week = $6,000,000 in 2045

Saving $500 a week = $30,000,000 in 2045

Saving $1,000 a week = $60,000,000 in 2045

Now let’s get properly bullish and use Saylors bull case 🐂 of $49 million per coin by 2045.

Saving $20 a week = $3,600,000 in 2045

Saving $50 a week = $9,000,000 in 2045

Saving $100 a week = $18,200,000 in 2045

Saving $500 a week = $90,000,000 in 2045

Saving $1,000 a week = $181,500,000 in 2045

If you save $20-$50 a week over the next 21 years you will end up with somewhere between 1.2 and 9 million dollars.

I mean bro for Americans that’s like me asking you not to go out to lunch once or twice a week.

That’s nothing.

Bitcoin would be $1 billion+ by 2045 since the USD is collapsing.

Only thing I want for Christmas is military tribunals and the MOASS

Elon's X is not the Free Speech platform people think it is

Back from babysitting puppies. So let's purge some heretics!

#spacemarine2

https://rumble.com/v5f7mhn-for-the-emperor-space-marine-2-operations.html

Hot take, but male protagonists in isekai #Anime should just get laid.