He is like “I know!”, but not quite yet! Not referring just to the article on the Bitcoin Forum, to what he said and elements in his home too.
You are referring to individual implementations of the nostr protocol. The protocol itself is not causing your issue, because Unicode itself should take care of text direction (see https://www.unicode.org/faq/bidi.html). You need to either have a look at relay or client implementations themselves.
Thanks for your reply. Anyways, if there is a problem at the relays, would it be useful to generate a solution within the Nostr protocol so that it’s easily or auto-implemented.
Everything can change. So if decentralization is the new normality, the common sense of the internet, many would appreciate it and follow even those at the center of the system.
Maybe the “new post” area should be like “new message” area of an email where more options are available to format the text and it’s possible to include more than one language simultaneously so that everything is kept the way it was typed once posted.
So maybe it’s necessary for the “new post” area to have features to format the text and that the format is kept while sharing it between different relays.
It seems that the text format is not kept when posting in two languages and that the posts are considered in English so the direction of the Arabic text is changed to its opposite direction to match the direction of the English text.
It happens when posting in two languages (English and Arabic). The posts look okay before actually posting them then they change when I click post; rendering the Arabic parts unreadable on many relays. Only on Plebstr the Arabic parts are appearing as they should be and the same parts are unreadable on all the other relays including Nos.social and Primal.
Do you have like “Nip-Arabic” on GitHub or something?! There is a problem while posting in Arabic because it can become unreadable on many relays as if the language is not recognized by the protocol and I think that could have kept Arabic speaking user away from joining Nostr.
The Official PBS kids show Arthur is trolling Elon.
https://www.tiktok.com/@arthurpbs?_t=8iF5vKUHazy&_r=1 https://v.nostr.build/jaoV.mp4
I guess they do that on purpose to Elon knowing that this could make him get angry.
I have tried to post directly on Nos in two languages (English and Arabic) and the post looked okay before actually posting it then it changed when I clicked post; rendering the Arabic parts unreadable. I have checked all my previous long posts appearing on Nos too, they got the same problem (they were posted on Plebstr initially and look okay only on Plebstr and the Arabic parts are unreadable on all the other relays including Nos).
nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6
Hello. Based on the feedback I received from you, I compiled the Nostr diagram into one page.
There are quite a lot of elements, so I'll just show you the line drawings for now. (I plan to add color once the contents are finalized)
In this illustration, the ostrich was not included in the cast. Instead, machines and robots are used to represent the internal workings of clients and relay servers. I also researched and added Zap while getting advice from various people.
What do you think of this diagram?

I think new users would be interested in what happens only on the UX in the beginning, other than that would confuse them.
Typing in two languages that are following opposite directions is complicated and it’s not possible to change from one to another on different platforms or apps. That’s why I usually type on notes, then copy and paste the text. Sometimes the « posting space » on different relays does not keep the format of the pasted text tho, that’s why the Arabic comes out wrong.
Yes, I guess I will post on nos next time and see how it goes. Thanks anyways.
*Evan.
So if I post a note in two languages (Arabic and English) on Nos it would be okay?
Here it is:

A hat or a hoodie can make a person unidentifiable.
If in Nostr each user runs a client can « user and client » be merged conceptually?!

