nostr:npub1nadtggdgf58wx4jjyu7x0ajkx94h873syn8mlt5jnmqgl600texsk42adz Close to the horizon there are atmospheric effects that screw with the numbers, so while I agree with your intuition, your evidence is not as convincing as you might hope.
nostr:npub1nadtggdgf58wx4jjyu7x0ajkx94h873syn8mlt5jnmqgl600texsk42adz ... but the answer is now found, the Moon's diameter is a thousand times bigger ... 3475 km, not 3475 m.
So it's 3.34 times 1000 seconds, or about 56 minutes.
nostr:npub1jwllprty3r83mu06vka8drp059s8hmn4fa766eje62jeygayelnsq05rwk Yup ... exactly right.
Now editing the original to admit the gaffe.
nostr:npub1z2qdmfzhs2uwg8kmsh37xavt2hq48gch63e787ggd3s6mt8waxgsxu3yuf
I think the moon's diameter is 3475 km, not m
nostr:npub1yzgcvpqkhc8zq7y4gx9v9ch8syk53xcsetw52l8mh3l7nup2gktqux3zfx Hah !!!
There we go, so the answer is about 1000 time bigger.
That makes sense !!!
Thank you ... feeling embarrassed now ...
nostr:npub1nadtggdgf58wx4jjyu7x0ajkx94h873syn8mlt5jnmqgl600texsk42adz Close to the horizon there are atmospheric effects that screw with the numbers, so while I agree with your intuition, your evidence is not as convincing as you might hope.
nostr:npub1h26g0vlvpxmqts4kykaaluwnq23x8fwc66t76vhvpmwdtaummzlsnkdd84 Completely clouded out here.
8-(
Distance to the Moon is about 390 Megameters, time to orbit is 27.32 days, so speed in m/s is:
D*2*pi/T/86400 ~ 1040 m/s
Diameter is about 3500 m, so time of occlusion is:
3500/1040 ~ 3.36
More accurately, diameter ~ 3475m, hence
3475/1040 ~ 3.34.
Seems low to me.
Can someone check my answer:
Does the Moon travel it's own diameter in about 3.34 seconds?
(Relative to the Earth)
So if it passed directly in front of a star, does it only take 3.34 seconds for that star to reappear on the other side?
Working to follow ...
In about half an hour, #UK_ISS #ISS pass, starting at 21:22:15, duration 130 secs, bright, Magnitude -2.5
Documenting this so I can come back to it later:
Calling nostr:npub12tahzsgclh8rsuue5ks99ka5wpydp9nr3sq3865y8360dyzjxtps3fnf76 ...
nostr:npub19lt4284mghqxekzm6n5njxurnxrxhqhrva2leusdsuu5ja5jeycq66qfjk nostr:npub1lywey3rjuskr7kstpvwj3xafa56qrkfc6r7f665rxvw4sv2jw6ps5vruez
Some passes of the #ISS visible from the UK overnight - I'll post alerts closer to the time - #UK_ISS
Whiteboards are remarkable.
nostr:npub1lx750nj5lngjr4tvpynv5q3ujuw7tucmwz6w6wqxtsgmzzlu5thq5lejfr Super ... thanks.
Some passes of the #ISS visible from the UK overnight - I'll post alerts closer to the time - #UK_ISS
I recently decided to sell my vacuum cleaner - all it was doing was gathering dust. -- Tim Vine
nostr:npub15wp53f6vfvr88zwg8jep4evdpjwl6exxpzfd7uwgxp2rxszcgdts993a95 nostr:npub1cn9fsandgc6nfkdq8sqr9szh0x5djdce3pkgy8f6enxqnxwzx8ssax9nha Best explained with a picture, but can't do that now, so here's a description.
Take a square, mark the centre, cut out the triangle between the centre and the bottom edge. Glue that onto the right hand side to get an irregular hexagon that I think is vaguely an abstract cow.
Got that?
So the resulting shape, the cow, has a classical two piece dissection where the pieces can be assembled into a square. After all, that's how the cow was constructed.
So ...
Find a *different* two piece classical dissection of the cow where the pieces can be assembled into the square.
Do not give it away !!!
DM me if (or when!) you get a solution.
Someone at nostr:npub1cn9fsandgc6nfkdq8sqr9szh0x5djdce3pkgy8f6enxqnxwzx8ssax9nha solved the cow problem!
Simultaneously impressive, exciting, and depressing ...
#TMiP23
The biggest waste of time is to do well something that we need not do at all. -- Gretchen Rubin, 'Better Than Before'
"The Golf Ball Paradox": throw a golf ball (or squash ball) into a cylinder and it pops back out (without touching the bottom)
Video by Steve Mould:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sbM2Isx17A
Mathematical analys:
(1) "Golfer's Dilemma", Marco Gualtieri et al, June 1 2006, American Journal of Physics, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2180281
(2) "On a simple formulation of the golf ball paradox", O Pujol et al, Feruary 27 2007, European Journal of Physics, https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/2/024
nostr:npub1z2qdmfzhs2uwg8kmsh37xavt2hq48gch63e787ggd3s6mt8waxgsxu3yuf I thought this would interest you.
nostr:npub1uhnx67vlf04mwtt7qrjyx47gpmtf3twz4nrfmx9lspw6rrv5gkhsv42f8t Nice one ...
I like all of Steve's videos, they're really good.
Q: What do you get when you cross a mosquito with a mountaineer? A: Nothing - you can't cross a vector with a scalar.