Source? They pretty much care about animals by the definition of the philosophy.
If by chance you want to stop strawmanning your opponents, here's the definition of veganism that vegans subscribe to:
The Vegan Society defines veganism as “a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals”.
You are correct that veganism "was never about greenhouse gas emissions", so I'm not sure what the point of this post was.
No shot at the playoffs, but beating the Donkeys 8 straight is pretty great.
How many years will it take them to beat the Las Vegas Raiders?
No shot at the playoffs, but beating the Donkeys 8 straight is pretty great.
How many years will it take them to beat the Las Vegas Raiders?
No shot at the playoffs, but beating the Donkeys 8 straight is pretty great.
How many years will it take them to beat the Las Vegas Raiders?
That's definitely true of language. It had to be developed iteratively by a community, probably over many generations.
Hypothetically, one entrepreneur could have noticed that one particular good was very widely valued in his community and began using it in indirect exchange.
Netted me a few sats over at freebitcoin on that game. Go Colts for the late game.
That's the other one I was thinking of.
I don't think so. This here describes really good what I mean on the example of language. I think it's the sange with original money.
https://www.kwintessential.co.uk/blog/general-interest/language-invention-intrinsic-trait
Sure, language is less of an invention than money, but "use of fire" was likely not a one-off invention either. I'm sure many people over many generations took part in developing how to use fire.
I'm fine with distinctions like that. It would rule out several other items on the list, though.
It's not stooping to their level, because you're not the one intruding into the affairs of peaceful people.
I'm not sure "invented" is incompatible with "developed out of the need for it".
Fair. I have language #1 and money #2, myself.
Money was more important than all of those put together.
I certainly don't think it would be two wrongs. By all means, stick it to them. I'm just pointing out that they aren't leaving any legal outs.
What you're describing is also a crime. I believe it is called "structuring".
Great use of "righty tighty lefty lucy", although I believe it's supposed to be "loosey".



