Are you willing to publish your overhead? Most traditional businesses are afraid to. In this case, it might be beneficial instead. I think it is possible for some systems, governments, etc to show the masses, "I need at least X to keep moving forward." If you're real about the figure, and people value what you provide, they will step up. If not, then you were offering something outside of its value.

I’m even done with saying “yeah, I’ll keep that one in mind, might check it out later” 🤷🏼‍♂️

If you don't like it, speak up or don't follow.

If you don't like it, speak up or don't follow.

God I hope so. Geeks are great at screwing up marketing entirely. Although I can see the coolness of "Simple X", the name was not thought through AT ALL. Did they even search the name first to see the results?

They might as well have named it anal herpes, but only if "anal herpes" returned five unrelated topics that have that same name.

God I hope so. Geeks are great at screwing up marketing entirely. Although I can see the coolness of "Simple X", the name was not thought through AT ALL. Did they even search the name first to see the results?

They might as well have named it anal herpes, but only if "anal herpes" returned five unrelated topics that have that same name.

It may not be possible to prove God's existence like one proves a scientific fact, but it is more rational to believe in God's existence since it is based on evidence. Here's the ontological argument:

God is defined as a maximally great being.

1. It is possible that a Maximally Great Being exists.

2. A Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world.

3. If a Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.

4. If a Maximally Great Being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.

5. A Maximally Great Being exists in the actual world.

6. Therefore, a Maximally Great Being exists.

It may not be possible to prove God's existence like one proves a scientific fact, but it is more rational to believe in God's existence since it is based on evidence. Here's the ontological argument:

God is defined as a maximally great being.

1. It is possible that a Maximally Great Being exists.

2. A Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world.

3. If a Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.

4. If a Maximally Great Being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.

5. A Maximally Great Being exists in the actual world.

6. Therefore, a Maximally Great Being exists.

GM #nostr

Another day playing the game of life.

May every die you roll today be a 6.

Will he then be paid in brics?

#meme #memestr

#meme #memestr

thank you.

gn

thank you.

gn

You see and understand the same way as me, really gratifying. It's not just getting it right or just spreading the word, it's about increasing the number of people who are ready and willing to do it.

Decentralize more than just Piriya, me or Right Shift and we'll definitely see it.

Even in the next life, it's worth waiting for it.

You see and understand the same way as me, really gratifying. It's not just getting it right or just spreading the word, it's about increasing the number of people who are ready and willing to do it.

Decentralize more than just Piriya, me or Right Shift and we'll definitely see it.

Even in the next life, it's worth waiting for it.

Oh man. I just learned that Ed Dowd lives in Maui. They are so in trouble 🙂

Oh man. I just learned that Ed Dowd lives in Maui. They are so in trouble 🙂