I hope we'll see those relays. Also required for nudity or other culturally sensitive topics. Plus child friendly nodes.
But client side could implement ai filter
Simplex works great, I'd love to replace WhatsApp for it. Don't see any real advantage of WhatsApp beyond Battery usage.
Biggest use case for Simplex is kids, need no Sim or phone number and has absolutely 0 spam cause nobody can contact you without you giving them link first.
I guess criminals will also like the anonymity. Feels bad to leak all metadata to meta ...
Damn you were homeless... How did that happen. I guess your murican. Where I live it's kind of impossible to become homeless unless you are a severe addict. Homeless people here are incredibly rare
I don't know the answer. If it stays like this nostr is destined to become like 4chan. A very niche platform most people are disgusted by. Right now its only tolerable cause its small.
The only known working solution is centralised censorship and if we embrace that we end up like twitter.
I hope we figure out some alternative.
It's true, this is a big problem waiting to be solved. 99% of people do not wanna see shit like that. And if casually looking at posts and then finding such a post is upsetting and will turn people away.
Censorship is not the solution, but we need to have better tools to curate feed, block and have some relays that filter stuff.
There are enough censored platforms out there that are safe for a lot of people (though some are always excluded)
Here we are open and uncensored and that means you will never find a safe place when viewing all of nostr. That does not mean nostr should become the same as everything else. The solution is to build filters for your community needs, use something else or grow a thick skin.
So nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx gave an absolute masterclass on the problems with Musk's current Twitter approach on WBD, starting at the 17m mark. It's a great advertisement for Nostr and I recommend everyone watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ms-dE6aasA
I've been retweeting or reposting Odell's various observations on this topic for a while and so I'm happy to share this too, including on Twitter today, even as a filthy blue-check myself.
Where I disagree with Odell (slightly) is on tactics. He thinks people should give up blue checks in protest. And that's a very fair position. I don't disagree, especially for someone like Odell with a purist position and a generally cypherpunk audience.
But I think there are multiple successful paths on this. I have always been a Twitter fan, and my normie audience is there. I wanted to be able to pay for better UX and anti-impersonation defenses for years before they became available. Just because Musk is running it doesn't mean I won't pay for helpful services, especially if they protect my audience. Real people lose money to Lyn Alden impersonation scams if they can't tell my account from others, and I directly hear from them when it happens. It's always heartbreaking.
So, I'm on the offensive, not the defensive. The way I view it, unless or until someone censors me on Twitter, they're locked in there with me, rather than me being locked in there with them. If having a blue check reduces the success rate of impersonation scams and amplifies my reach at calling out Twitter's problems, I'll have the blue check. What I absolutely *won't* do is change what I say based on a blue check. If anything, I purposely overdo it to the opposite and exaggerate my criticisms on purpose to push back against platform incentives.
Two simultaneous approaches:
1) Call out the problem on Twitter. Don't give Musk a pass. Point out that a pro-freedom, pro-anonymity view doesn't match with what is going on there. Don't let his rhetoric disguise his inaction. If Twitter cares about freedom and anonymity then they will offer a paid option that doesn't require identity (e.g. the "orange check" bitcoin payment.) Until something like that, they are LARPing and are fair to criticize as such.
2) Have your foot here on Nostr and on decentralization technologies generally. In the long run, I think this is the future. And more importantly, I hope it is.
I hate the word 'masterclass'. Immediately sounds like some bring ad article to mee
What I mean more precisely is what is it about the female body that invokes the ladie-like treatment?
I guess you would not say that male bodies deserve to be treated like ladies, and probably also not female animals. So there must be something unique aboute the female human body.
Since I cannot tell what it might be to me this feels like a mystical quality
Thanks, that was exactly what I needed
You said that women deserve to be treated as ladies and by that you are referring to a mystical concept that is inscribed onto the female body.
I do disagree on a lot here. First what has value is what people are willing to pay for, and it just happens that a lot of men like to pay for female bodies. So they have value. Dev work also has value, just a little less as it turns out.
Then there is the mystification of women and what they deserve. Women are just people, they dont need protectors, they don't deserve anything special, just to be free like anyone else. And that means they can choose to objectify themselves and market their bodies. Especially here on nostr.
It's 2023 and still men are telling women what they can or cannot do with their bodies...
Build is the new buidl