How might we prevent the co-opt-ion of wiki nostr by a singular, and narrow viewpoint?
cc nostr:npub1a7n2h5y3gt90y00mwrknhx74fyzzjqw25ehkscje58x9tfyhqd5snyvfnu nostr:note197gwlnyq0tz3nsnfyrwqtvw0xq346xewhvr2aapak7m9kcjgn44svxz9pw
Need input from the many projects that have aimed to improve upon wikipedia already. Citizendium, Handwiki, and Sanger / Knowledge Standards Foundation / Encyclosphere, even self-admittedly biased ones: Rationalwiki, Conservapedia.
I think the issue is not to aim for a variety of contributors, but to allow the crowd to sort it out, and to allow for user-side filtering. It is the same challenge as with algorithms - allow for a market of filtration of data. Do not aim to restrict data.
With an encyclopedia page - the basic model would have multiple versions of the page available to the reader, with the reader choosing whose version to trust based on presets, preferences, defaults (be careful!) and the advice from peers.
The more advanced model (which has some effort and discussion into it already in various places around the internet) would involve realtime dynamic population of generated text based on user choice and bold, italic, or differently colored fonts to show various levels of trust of the information provided, based on user's preferences, presets, or the preferences of trusted peers.
Now, there are possibilities to have the page generated in realtime by ChatGPT-like services and data vending machines...
Not a bad mute. Not a good or effective meme for truth. But it has nothing to do with a 'they' or an image board. It has to do with an individual. Collectivizing - superimposing the actions of an individual onto a website or nebulous group container is the same thinking that makes this a bad meme.
GM #Nostr!
Are you prepared for this week's #zapathon?
π Let us know in comments: What #Nostr client are you using right now - and we will test the zap-receive feature on your end ;)
Our browser extension is the easiest tool to use zaps on desktop:
https://getalby.com/#alby-extension
And Nostr Wallet Connect - available in many mobile clients - allows #1tapzaps on your smartphone.
πππππππππππ
Get ready!
Coracle on web, it provides conversation context and allows lists. I have 11 connected sites to Alby, that I use regularly :thumbsup:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mLUdBnJ0ls
nostr:nprofile1qqsr9cvzwc652r4m83d86ykplrnm9dg5gwdvzzn8ameanlvut35wy3gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmc3nfy6g + Robert Breedlove interview
Nostr is decentralization + network effects for the individual, rather than network effects for those approved by the corporation.
Reduction of market distortion and competition that is more democratic in the true sense.
That would be necessary to retain market share among the purple and orange pilled, I would hope
Ping me next time and I will be there π
As close to proof of stake as I get, being under-employed and not heavily invested in the dollar.
#proofofsteak #ribbin
C is for Cookie. Is good enough for me
I'm assuming the data is valuable if/when tools are created to 'list posts minus my friend's mutes' or 'review my friend's mutes' for discrepancies'