no. sorry, that's wrong. go through 50 UWorld questions for USMLE Step 2 and then come back and tell me if you still believe this.
We actually treat acne with Vitamin A if it's really severe bro.🤯🤯🤯
you are paid to get a phd bro
The **Tor Browser**, which is the most common way people access the Tor network, is built on Mozilla Firefox’s open-source code.
Uses a modified version of Firefox’s Gecko engine and is hardened with additional privacy and security features.
The Tor Project team customizes this Firefox base to integrate it with the Tor network, adding things like the Tor protocol, proxy settings, and anti-tracking measures that vanilla Firefox doesn’t have.
So, while the Tor Browser is derived from Firefox, it's not even close to being the same thing.
The Tor NETWORK is a decentralized system of servers (nodes) that routes your internet traffic through multiple layers of encryption to protect your privacy and anonymity.
It's not a browser.
you're joking right?
-not for mobile
-c++
-becoming a compilation of other browsers now that "we're not bound by SerenityOS restrictions anymore, hooray!"
ALPHA expected summer 2026
this is a hot mess, stay away
A tryhard isn't someone who gives it their best. Buy a dictionary.
#2 you can only blame yourself for
Lower hashrate does make censorship easier—it’s cheaper for attackers to dominate the network. Higher hashrate raises the cost of attacks, but raw power alone isn’t enough. If a single entity controls most of that hashrate, they could still manipulate transactions.
Security isn’t just about the *amount* of hashrate—it’s about **who controls it** and **why they’d behave honestly**. For example:
- A decentralized network of independent miners is harder to corrupt than a few large pools.
- Miners following incentives (e.g., profit from honest mining vs. risking penalties for cheating) add another layer of security.
Other factors like node distribution, geographic diversity, and hardware variety also matter. No single metric guarantees safety, but combining high hashrate with decentralization and aligned incentives works best. Thoughts?
They're not idiots? Oh. Since when?
The copium on nostr rn is bizarre
You're way out of your depth, have poor reading comprehension, and are creating strawmen. Pathetic.
"The censor has hashrate too” likely means that raw hashrate doesn’t distinguish between good actors (miners securing the network) and bad ones (those who might exploit it).
Security isn’t just about quantity but intent and control.
The success of Amazon is built on the corpses of local markets.
#Amazon isn't success. Amazon / internet markets bailed out the failing fiat monstrt in the 90s.
There are not many reasonable ethical scenarios where a bitcoiner should be buying dailies from another State.
Offering items for sale online is a different thing.